Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post Reply
Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:26 pm

Twoflower wrote:I can not believe that I agree with everything you have said Coito. I am all for full body scans and pat downs, I have had the pat downs multiple times and it is always a female agent who does it and they are always professional and courteous.
:hugs: See....I'm not that bad.... :biggrin:

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:40 pm

Twoflower wrote:I can not believe that I agree with everything you have said Coito. I am all for full body scans and pat downs, I have had the pat downs multiple times and it is always a female agent who does it and they are always professional and courteous.
... and gay as Mamma Mia. :tea:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
drl2
Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by drl2 » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:02 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote: Image
That looks just like the alien who abducted me and subjected me to repeated anal probes!

Seriously though (... alright, only slightly seriously), how did you get a copy of your scan? Do they sell them at a gift shop afterward, like those amusement park pictures of your face flapping in the wind while you ride a roller coaster? And how much more fun would those pictures be if you rode the roller coaster naked? Flappitty-flappity-flappity. (Or would it be fappitty-fappitty-fappitty? Could there be such thing as a Wind Job?)

What was this thread about again?
Who needs a signature anyway?

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:05 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Twoflower wrote:I can not believe that I agree with everything you have said Coito. I am all for full body scans and pat downs, I have had the pat downs multiple times and it is always a female agent who does it and they are always professional and courteous.
... and gay as Mamma Mia. :tea:
...it's fine if they're lipstick lesbians.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Warren Dew » Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:07 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:On the surface, however, something about this seems unlikely. He pulled her blouse down so that it exposed her breasts? What kind of blouse was this? Most blouses have buttons and stuff and cant just be pulled straight down and out pop the breasts.... and what do they mean about exposed breasts? Were the breasts all the way out, or was it a partial exposure of the breasts?
I'm pretty sure this blouse would come down pretty easily:

Image

Google "tube blouse" and you can find a lot more like it.

Given the millions that travel every year, I'd actually be surprised if there weren't incidents like this happening pretty regularly. A lawsuit and some firings might get the TSA folks to be a little more careful.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:40 pm

Warren Dew wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:On the surface, however, something about this seems unlikely. He pulled her blouse down so that it exposed her breasts? What kind of blouse was this? Most blouses have buttons and stuff and cant just be pulled straight down and out pop the breasts.... and what do they mean about exposed breasts? Were the breasts all the way out, or was it a partial exposure of the breasts?
I'm pretty sure this blouse would come down pretty easily:

Image

Google "tube blouse" and you can find a lot more like it.

Given the millions that travel every year, I'd actually be surprised if there weren't incidents like this happening pretty regularly. A lawsuit and some firings might get the TSA folks to be a little more careful.
I suppose - I would not be surprised if an accident happened, but I would be surprised if someone brazenly did it on purpose and then everyone just callously pointed and laughed and ridiculed her. Stranger things have happened, of course, but I wonder what sort of corroborating testimony she has.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Feck » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:43 pm

ScholasticSpastic wrote:I support full-body scans to the extent that they might allow me to keep my boots on. Takes fucking forever to put the damned things back on and all the seats are usually taken by lazy sods with slip-on footwear. If we're going to continue this shoes off bullshit, there needs to be a designated seating area for those who have footwear to put back on, forfeited the moment the job is done.
:angrythis:
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Feck » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:55 pm

Mind you it's funny because perceived security and real security are different things .
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39291
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Animavore » Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:41 pm

I wish they'd get the scanners over here.
I can't abide people touching me or violating me in anyway. They know they have power over you and there's fuck all you can do about it and that drives me insane.
Probably got bullied in school, the pricks.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by lordpasternack » Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:55 pm

I've been through scanners, patted down, had the padlock on my suitcase broken off and my luggage at least sniffed... SO FUCKING WHAT?

I'm more annoyed by the liquid restrictions (which aren't actually all that defensible, when you get down to the science of it), and the worry about putting certain items in certain boxes for going through the luggage scanner and whatnot, when I'm tired and dazed during long-haul flying. Oh, and the possibility of "accidents" during potentional pat downs. I was patted down after being scanned in Singapore on the way back from Australia, just after the fly button came off my trousers, and I'd abashedly picked it back up from the ground. It goes without saying that my belt was also off at that time. Things could have got a bit undignified. :hehe:

And yet another relevant strip from XKCD:

Image

:biggrin:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
eXcommunicate
Mr Handsome Sr.
Posts: 821
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:49 pm
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by eXcommunicate » Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:31 am

It's appalling how much bodily freedom and privacy you guys are willing to give away for "security" that is truly an illusion. None of these procedures will prevent a bomb from getting into the cargo hold. And what if terrorists start hiding bombs up their asses, would you then advocate your children and loved ones receive body cavity searches from rubber-gloved mouth-breathers before they board an air plane? Perhaps everyone should be chained to their seats in-flight, catheterized, and administered a sedative for the duration of the flight... for your safety. A backscatter scan or pubic hair sniffer won't prevent a terrorist from blowing himself up at the mall this coming Black Friday, or from blowing himself up IN LINE at the airport before he's even screened.

Image

The shoe bomber was not stopped by the TSA. The shoe bomber was stopped by alert and courageous passengers. The new fortified cockpits and vigilant passengers are the best weapons we have against another 9/11. Everything else, so far, has been window dressing. Terrorists don't even have to attempt to stage another 9/11 style attack, when we waste billions of USD on useless procedures that are more designed to catch contraband and placate law abiding citizens than to prevent a psycho from hijacking the plane.
Michael Hafer
You know, when I read that I wanted to muff-punch you with my typewriter.
One girl; two cocks. Ultimate showdown.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39291
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Animavore » Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:01 am

Personally I feel like cattle going through security. Or maybe a line of eastern european hookers being examined by seedy punters. And it's not about 'touching junk'. its being touched at all.
I've never liked groups who enforce their will through their strength, numbers or weapons, be it bouncers, security, police, army, armed robbers, extortionist thugs or terrorists. we only need the former group because the latter group exist.
it's one of those things about people i've never understood. i've never felt the need to push, demand, order or coerce.
in my utopia none of the above exist :sighsm:
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by Trolldor » Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:27 pm

What freedom is being given up?
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
DRSB
Posts: 5601
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:07 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by DRSB » Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:41 pm

An interview with a security consultant:

"Is this security theater?
100 percent. It won't catch anybody."

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/ext ... -imaginary

User avatar
eXcommunicate
Mr Handsome Sr.
Posts: 821
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:49 pm
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: Revolt over Full Body Scans and Pat Downs at Airports

Post by eXcommunicate » Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:10 pm

The Mad Hatter wrote:What freedom is being given up?
How about the Constitutional right to unreasonable search, seizure, and the implied right to privacy?

I realize that we're on Ratz, where members post photos of their fiddly bits for all to see, but some of you seem pretty keen on giving the government the right to do just about anything they well please to your body in the name of "security." How far are you willing to go here?
Deersbee wrote:An interview with a security consultant:

"Is this security theater?
100 percent. It won't catch anybody."

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/ext ... -imaginary
FTA:

The machines have shown up in the wake of the so-called underwear bomber, who tried to blow up a plane with chemicals stored in his briefs. Would this technology have stopped him?
The guys who make the machines have said, "We wouldn't have caught that."

Do you think there's been an over-reaction, on the part of the government and the press, to the underwear bomber?
That case was really instructive. Nobody was injured, and the plane landed safely. It was a success! And it was pre 9-11 security that made it a success. Because we screen for superficial guns and bombs, he had to resort to a syringe and 90 minutes in the bathroom with a bomb that didn't work.
Michael Hafer
You know, when I read that I wanted to muff-punch you with my typewriter.
One girl; two cocks. Ultimate showdown.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests