Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post Reply
User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by Tigger » Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:18 pm

Empirical studies show that intelligence regresses to the mean. The Wiki segment below (from here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ) shows the type of calculation that proves it using sampled data. So, if this is the case, and evolution has shown a marked demonstration of increase in brain size and function over time, why would intelligence not be increasing generally instead of lurking around our (frankly pitiful) mean? Obviously, in evolutionary terms such time spans as a few generations are meaningless, but why this trend?

Image
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
GenesForLife
Bertie Wooster
Posts: 1392
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by GenesForLife » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:03 pm

Cause we're now constrained by the size of the skull, which can increase no further?

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by Tigger » Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:08 pm

GenesForLife wrote:Cause we're now constrained by the size of the skull, which can increase no further?
Can't imagine that being the case, as there is plenty of scope within the brain for society to aspire to Einsteinian intellect. And that's not a happenin':

Image
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
GenesForLife
Bertie Wooster
Posts: 1392
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by GenesForLife » Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:14 pm

Does the genetic makeup of the majority of the population allow for a capacity for such intelligence to be developed? Can we be certain that any possible genetic factors that may have influenced Einstein's intelligence are the norm today?

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by Tigger » Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:09 pm

If it were genetically constrained then surely there would be a general reduction in the intelligence of offspring with little possibility of an increase. What we see is when two parents of higher intellect (on average) have a child, the child is likely to be demonstrably less intelligent than that parental average. Conversely two less intelligent parents will be likely to have a more intelligent child than their average. Were there such genetic factors, the former case makes sense, but the genetic input from the latter two parents shouldn't allow their offspring to be more intelligent than they are.
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
Azathoth
blind idiot god
blind idiot god
Posts: 9418
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by Azathoth » Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:34 pm

It is fuck all to do with genetics. It is a combination of mindless tripe on the TV and a culture of intellectualism being a subject of ridicule.
Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.

Code: Select all

// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis 
   $str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by JimC » Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:11 am

No longer any selective bias towards greater survival and reproductive success based on intelligence...

In addition, possibly, excessive intelligence is accomanied by a tendency to obsession with some intellectual pursuit and ignoring reproductive chances, and very low intelligence will also have reproductive drawbacks, so we could have stabilising selection towards the mean...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

Dory
Busty wench
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by Dory » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:26 am

Thank you, JimC. Makes much more sense than everyone else here.

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by Tigger » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:00 am

Q.E.D. ;)
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: Intelligence regresses to the mean

Post by Tigger » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:05 am

And additionally we are not going to evolve into hyperintelligent beings because we are as a society concerned about looking after our fellow man (ok, or fucking woman, Dory :D ) regardless of ability and "value" to society. Great. Kill Everyone !11!!!!!!!1!11 :mob:
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest