A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60669
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by pErvinalia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:10 am

Charlou wrote:
JimC wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:And by the way, racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots deserve to be treated like the pieces of shit they are.
The key point is, that here, they are met by rational debate (and usually trenchant criticism) rather than the ban hammer...

There's this little thing called freedom of speech...
Yes, over there he couldn't call such groups 'pieces of shit', for a start ... which is what this is all about, it seems.
:fp: Another post with absolutely no idea. Some of you people really need to get your information from more accurate sources, as opposed to serial whiners who think the whole internet is out to get them.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:25 am

rEvolutionist wrote:
Charlou wrote:
JimC wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:And by the way, racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots deserve to be treated like the pieces of shit they are.
The key point is, that here, they are met by rational debate (and usually trenchant criticism) rather than the ban hammer...

There's this little thing called freedom of speech...
Yes, over there he couldn't call such groups 'pieces of shit', for a start ... which is what this is all about, it seems.
:fp: Another post with absolutely no idea. Some of you people really need to get your information from more accurate sources, as opposed to serial whiners who think the whole internet is out to get them.
It will take a long time to live down the ban on the word "teabaggers". Although I felt like :banghead: when I saw it the first time, it was pretty much unavoidable and now with some perspective, it's funny.

If you cannot enjoy a laugh at your own expense, you're ripping yourself off.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Feck » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:44 am

Ok I will say it again... RatSkep has RatSkep rules, joining the forum you signed up to those rules .I feel the Outrage at abiding by those rules is a little dramatic .

The fact is I don't like their rules so I never go there .
However.
This IS Rationalia , here we are free to say what we think or feel (or make make bad jokes and banter) If some of our members new or old want to complain about another forum then they can.

I think we proved that, a while ago, when we opened the place to hundreds of angry and confused RDF refugees and let them vent and bitch . I don't think the staff at rationalia will be censoring this thread or hiding it where it can't be seen . If that isn't obvious to you just ask Josh or Richard :td:


We could rename this bit of the forum ' Laughing and Bitching at Inferior Forums' though :lol:


ooops I'm sorry I said "bitching" I understand that is an offensive term that denigrates women.
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Robert_S » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:47 am

Feck wrote:Ok I will say it again... RatSkep has RatSkep rules, joining the forum you signed up to those rules .I feel the Outrage at abiding by those rules is a little dramatic .

The fact is I don't like their rules so I never go there .
However.
This IS Rationalia , here we are free to say what we think or feel (or make make bad jokes and banter) If some of our members new or old want to complain about another forum then they can.

I think we proved that, a while ago, when we opened the place to hundreds of angry and confused RDF refugees and let them vent and bitch . I don't think the staff at rationalia will be censoring this thread or hiding it where it can't be seen . If that isn't obvious to you just ask Josh or Richard :td:


We could rename this bit of the forum ' Laughing and Bitching at Inferior Forums' though :lol:


ooops I'm sorry I said "bitching" I understand that is an offensive term that denigrates women.
...and those males who take the non-dominant role in a prison romance.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
leo-rcc
Robo-Warrior
Posts: 7848
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
About me: Combat robot builder
Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by leo-rcc » Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:52 am

rEvolutionist wrote:
Charlou wrote:
JimC wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:And by the way, racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots deserve to be treated like the pieces of shit they are.
The key point is, that here, they are met by rational debate (and usually trenchant criticism) rather than the ban hammer...

There's this little thing called freedom of speech...
Yes, over there he couldn't call such groups 'pieces of shit', for a start ... which is what this is all about, it seems.
:fp: Another post with absolutely no idea. Some of you people really need to get your information from more accurate sources, as opposed to serial whiners who think the whole internet is out to get them.
You posted this rule in this very thread.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org

Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you

User avatar
Durro
Token Straight Guy
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:23 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Durro » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:03 pm

What Feck said...

It's apples and oranges. Different forums with different foci, styles and rules. You know what you're getting in each and, for me at least, that's the attraction of each. I find Ratz and Ratskep to be complimentary rather than competitive, where I can post with different styles depending on which forum I'm logged on to. There's people I admire and respect in each forum and others...meh, not so much. But that's the nature of being in any large group of diverse people.

I'd personally like to see this "us against them" thing dissipate, particularly when coming from people with feet in both camps.

:cheers:

User avatar
Ronja
Just Another Safety Nut
Posts: 10920
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:13 pm
About me: mother of 2 girls, married to fellow rat MiM, student (SW, HCI, ICT...) , self-employed editor/proofreader/translator
Location: Helsinki, Finland, EU
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Ronja » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:17 pm

Charlou wrote:
NineOneFour wrote:I think I'll start a thread at Ratskep making shit up about Rationalia and see how many Rationalia-types take offense...
:lol: I couldn't give a ratz arse.
:funny:

Though, seriously, Charlou, it's far more ladylike to "not give a rodent's hind parts" - or so I've heard... ;)
"The internet is made of people. People matter. This includes you. Stop trying to sell everything about yourself to everyone. Don’t just hammer away and repeat and talk at people—talk TO people. It’s organic. Make stuff for the internet that matters to you, even if it seems stupid. Do it because it’s good and feels important. Put up more cat pictures. Make more songs. Show your doodles. Give things away and take things that are free." - Maureen J

"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Bella Fortuna » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:20 pm

Durro wrote:What Feck said...

It's apples and oranges. Different forums with different foci, styles and rules. You know what you're getting in each and, for me at least, that's the attraction of each. I find Ratz and Ratskep to be complimentary rather than competitive, where I can post with different styles depending on which forum I'm logged on to. There's people I admire and respect in each forum and others...meh, not so much. But that's the nature of being in any large group of diverse people.

I'd personally like to see this "us against them" thing dissipate, particularly when coming from people with feet in both camps.

:cheers:
This cannot be stressed enough! Everyone gets annoyed at one time or another either here or there... but we should try to keep a larger perspective.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Ronja
Just Another Safety Nut
Posts: 10920
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:13 pm
About me: mother of 2 girls, married to fellow rat MiM, student (SW, HCI, ICT...) , self-employed editor/proofreader/translator
Location: Helsinki, Finland, EU
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Ronja » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:32 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:
The Mad Hatter wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:responding to tatt

my reason for disliking that other rats what ever the hell they're called is cause I can't even fart an opinion without getting reported. WHat is their frekn problem? It's like talking with a bunch of 5 yr olds!
What, not allowing racist sexist homophobic bigoted opinion is acting like "5 yr olds" is it? :fp:
It's not acting like five year olds, but it is treating everybody like five year olds.
Man, it's parochial over here... Shifting the goal posts eh?

And by the way, racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots deserve to be treated like the pieces of shit they are.
Disclaimer: I've not really been over to RatSkep for months now. So this is more like a general observation.

If you treat anyone as if they were a piece of shit, you tend to get bad behavior in return. If, on the other hand, you treat people as if they had brains, conscience, and courage, something like 90-99 % tend to come up with those - or at least try. Self-fulfilling prophesies abound in the discipline craft/art, IME (mother, scout leader, and college/university lecturer).

There definitely is such a thing as over-disciplining kids or students - and it's not wise. I suspect one can also over-moderate a forum.
"The internet is made of people. People matter. This includes you. Stop trying to sell everything about yourself to everyone. Don’t just hammer away and repeat and talk at people—talk TO people. It’s organic. Make stuff for the internet that matters to you, even if it seems stupid. Do it because it’s good and feels important. Put up more cat pictures. Make more songs. Show your doodles. Give things away and take things that are free." - Maureen J

"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60669
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by pErvinalia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:24 pm

leo-rcc wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:
Charlou wrote:
JimC wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:And by the way, racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots deserve to be treated like the pieces of shit they are.
The key point is, that here, they are met by rational debate (and usually trenchant criticism) rather than the ban hammer...

There's this little thing called freedom of speech...
Yes, over there he couldn't call such groups 'pieces of shit', for a start ... which is what this is all about, it seems.
:fp: Another post with absolutely no idea. Some of you people really need to get your information from more accurate sources, as opposed to serial whiners who think the whole internet is out to get them.
You posted this rule in this very thread.
What are you talking about? I haven't posted any rules from ratskep.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by kiki5711 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:32 pm

Ronja wrote:
Charlou wrote:
NineOneFour wrote:I think I'll start a thread at Ratskep making shit up about Rationalia and see how many Rationalia-types take offense...
:lol: I couldn't give a ratz arse.
:funny:

Though, seriously, Charlou, it's far more ladylike to "not give a rodent's hind parts" - or so I've heard... ;)

:hehe: :hehe: :hehe:

User avatar
leo-rcc
Robo-Warrior
Posts: 7848
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
About me: Combat robot builder
Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by leo-rcc » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:45 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:
leo-rcc wrote:You posted this rule in this very thread.
What are you talking about? I haven't posted any rules from ratskep.
http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 67#p563067
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org

Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by charlou » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:58 pm

Ronja wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:
The Mad Hatter wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:responding to tatt

my reason for disliking that other rats what ever the hell they're called is cause I can't even fart an opinion without getting reported. WHat is their frekn problem? It's like talking with a bunch of 5 yr olds!
What, not allowing racist sexist homophobic bigoted opinion is acting like "5 yr olds" is it? :fp:
It's not acting like five year olds, but it is treating everybody like five year olds.
Man, it's parochial over here... Shifting the goal posts eh?

And by the way, racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots deserve to be treated like the pieces of shit they are.
Disclaimer: I've not really been over to RatSkep for months now. So this is more like a general observation.

If you treat anyone as if they were a piece of shit, you tend to get bad behavior in return. If, on the other hand, you treat people as if they had brains, conscience, and courage, something like 90-99 % tend to come up with those - or at least try. Self-fulfilling prophesies abound in the discipline craft/art, IME (mother, scout leader, and college/university lecturer).

There definitely is such a thing as over-disciplining kids or students - and it's not wise. I suspect one can also over-moderate a forum.
Couldn't agree more. Wise words.


Also with Feck and Durro :cheers:
no fences

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Warren Dew » Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:06 pm

Robert_S wrote:With more mods and more delegation, you're getting more complexity and eventually you'll need one rule and then another... Once you don't have a situation where just about everybody knows everybody, it gets qualitatively different.
The Richard Dawkins forums operated fine for a long time without the sexism/racism rules, and never had group attack rules that I know of, and it was much bigger than either Rationalia or Rational Skepticism.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Warren Dew » Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:09 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:responding to tatt

my reason for disliking that other rats what ever the hell they're called is cause I can't even fart an opinion without getting reported. WHat is their frekn problem? It's like talking with a bunch of 5 yr olds!
What, not allowing racist sexist homophobic bigoted opinion is acting like "5 yr olds" is it? :fp:
I'm pretty sure it wasn't racism, sexism, or homophobia that got kiki reported.

Farting too much, on the other hand....

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests