I don't have time at the moment to find primary sources, but I am pretty sure that many ordinary Germans viewed the Nazis anti-semitism with distaste and disgust. Many of them did not subscribe to Der Sturmer and its views, but the best that most could do was ignore it and hope it would all go away.Charlou wrote:Addressing the part I've bolded, regarding laughing it off and ignoring the propaganda: Did this happen at all, and if it did, how many did so and for how long? What other factors were in play to coerce people into accepting the propaganda and eventually acting on it?devogue wrote:However, perhaps there are some clear historical precedents that show that hate speech can have an extremely negative impact. For instance, I would argue that Der Sturmer, the Nazi newspaper published between 1923 and 1945, was a prime example of "hate speech". Certain ethnic groups, especially the Jews, were villified week in and week out, As Albert Forster, the gauleiter of Danzig wrote in the 1930s:
An entire race was negatively stereotyped for years, the end result being catastrophic beyond belief. Was it enough to laugh it off? Was it enough to ignore the propaganda, to ridicule it, to sweep it under the carpet of one's sensibilities? Clearly not.With pleasure I say that the Stürmer, more than any other daily or weekly newspaper, has made clear to the people in simple ways the danger of Jewry.
Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
- Don't Panic
- Evil Admin
- Posts: 10653
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
- About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
- Location: Luimneach, Eire
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
We have you beat, we have a blasphemy law.Pappa wrote:It gets worse... we have a "religious harassment" law here too.Coito ergo sum wrote:I can merely shake my head in disbelief that such a law could exist in a civilized western country.

Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
We have internet filters being touted as a wholesome planDon't Panic wrote:We have you beat, we have a blasphemy law.Pappa wrote:It gets worse... we have a "religious harassment" law here too.Coito ergo sum wrote:I can merely shake my head in disbelief that such a law could exist in a civilized western country.








no fences
- owtth
- The Enchanter
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:21 pm
- About me: Well y'know
- Location: Barcelona
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Not so much ignore it as go along with the flow, perhaps from fear of persecution, thereby facilitating the whole debacle, only a small percentage of the Germans were Nazis but it was enough.devogue wrote:I don't have time at the moment to find primary sources, but I am pretty sure that many ordinary Germans viewed the Nazis anti-semitism with distaste and disgust. Many of them did not subscribe to Der Sturmer and its views, but the best that most could do was ignore it and hope it would all go away.
At least I'm housebroken.
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
I want the lying politicians, the nazis and the blasphemers and the islamists and the atheists right out in the open where they can be seen and heard.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41000
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Yep, so do I, right at the other end of the firing range where I'm practicing with an M2HB and live ammo.Lion IRC wrote:I want the lying politicians, the nazis and the blasphemers and the islamists and the atheists right out in the open where they can be seen and heard.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Blasphemy is a victimless crime.Lion IRC wrote:I want the lying politicians, the nazis and the blasphemers and the islamists and the atheists right out in the open where they can be seen and heard.

no fences
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41000
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
So is statutory rape... it's still quite vigorously prosecuted, even when the minor is testifying for the defence (and no, I don't believe it's Stockhom syndrome either)
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74090
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Dev's point included mention of a thread title being inflammatory...
Mods can edit thread titles (and of course put a little note saying why...)
So, a future post saying "Evil Jews evict arab farmers" could become "Israeli government evicts arab farmers"
Mods can edit thread titles (and of course put a little note saying why...)
So, a future post saying "Evil Jews evict arab farmers" could become "Israeli government evicts arab farmers"
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
It could.
But it shouldn't.
But it shouldn't.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
- Don't Panic
- Evil Admin
- Posts: 10653
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
- About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
- Location: Luimneach, Eire
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Yeah, it should become IDF/Mossad/Zionist conspiracy seize Arab land to construct runway for UFOs.The Mad Hatter wrote:It could.
But it shouldn't.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.
- Santa_Claus
- Your Imaginary Friend
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:06 pm
- About me: Ho! Ho! Ho!
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Not entirely sure what hate speech is?
But I do have some seriously f#cked up political views if anyone wants to hear them
Even I wouldn't want to live in a world run by people like me...........
But I do have some seriously f#cked up political views if anyone wants to hear them

Even I wouldn't want to live in a world run by people like me...........
I am Leader of all The Atheists in the world - FACT.
Come look inside Santa's Hole
You want to hear the truth about Santa Claus???.....you couldn't handle the truth about Santa Claus!!!
Come look inside Santa's Hole

You want to hear the truth about Santa Claus???.....you couldn't handle the truth about Santa Claus!!!
- RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
Mods shouldn't be changing any thread titles. The OP of the thread needs to realise that (although we shouldn't) everyone will judge a book by its cover, and a thread titled "Evil Jews evict arab farmers" will instantly turn off many people even if the evidence for such an act is valid.JimC wrote:Dev's point included mention of a thread title being inflammatory...
Mods can edit thread titles (and of course put a little note saying why...)
So, a future post saying "Evil Jews evict arab farmers" could become "Israeli government evicts arab farmers"
RuleBritannia © MMXI
- FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
I'd love to live in a world run by people like me. However, I know that 99.99...% of the rest of the world would hate it.Santa_Claus wrote:Not entirely sure what hate speech is?
But I do have some seriously f#cked up political views if anyone wants to hear them![]()
Even I wouldn't want to live in a world run by people like me...........
Stolen from XC, who stole it from Wiki:
Under the Law of the United Kingdom, "incitement to racial hatred" was established as an offence by the provisions of §§ 17-29 of the Public Order Act 1986. It was first established as a criminal offence in the Race Relations Act 1976. The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 made publication of material that incited racial hatred an arrestable offence.
This offence refers to:
deliberately provoking hatred of a racial group
distributing racist material to the public
making inflammatory public speeches
creating racist websites on the Internet
inciting inflammatory rumours about an individual or an ethnic group, for the purpose of spreading racial discontent.
Holocaust denial is not covered under this legislation, but laws against incitement to hatred against religions were later established under the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incitement ... ial_hatred
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Hate speech on Ratz. Should we tolerate it?
While it's right to make illegal the incitement of race-hate, it's easy to fall into the trap of feeling guilty over it.
Race hate is a perfectly normal human characteristic, we all inherit the tendency, and it made us what we are. Our ancestors were extremely territorial, hated their neighbours ( except the odd young sexy ones ), and used to kill and eat them.
The "nicer" ones, that we aspire to be like, got killed and eaten many thousands of years ago by our race-hating ancestors, who's genes we carry.
When I was a kid, we naturally formed into gangs, and I can remember being very scared of kids from two or three streets away, if I was on my own. You have to remember we are still stone age savages, genetically.
I'm personally not in the least ashamed when a racist thought pops into my head. I simply smile and ignore it, knowing where it comes from.
.
Race hate is a perfectly normal human characteristic, we all inherit the tendency, and it made us what we are. Our ancestors were extremely territorial, hated their neighbours ( except the odd young sexy ones ), and used to kill and eat them.
The "nicer" ones, that we aspire to be like, got killed and eaten many thousands of years ago by our race-hating ancestors, who's genes we carry.
When I was a kid, we naturally formed into gangs, and I can remember being very scared of kids from two or three streets away, if I was on my own. You have to remember we are still stone age savages, genetically.
I'm personally not in the least ashamed when a racist thought pops into my head. I simply smile and ignore it, knowing where it comes from.
.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests