Simple Mafia 4 - Rules, Peanuts

[veteran of forum wars]

All you need to know about the setup is that the specials in the game are variations on the seer and doctor roles.

Usual rules apply:

-no private communication between players except for wolves
-no quoting of my PM's
-absolutely no game talk in the Peanut Gallery, especially at night
-if you are not sure if you're allowed to do something, ask first.

Now taking questions. Roles are going out as we speak.

[Bartholomew Roberts]

variations

ruhroh

[veteran of forum wars]

all roles should be out and the game thread is up. i will be taking some questions about your roles in the next few minutes... if you don't understand your role and i am not around to answer, just play as if you were a vanilla townie until i get back.

[Bartholomew Roberts]

know your role

[sparklecat]

Posting so that I'm allowed to PM.

[oblivion]

One of the side games in a learning mafia is figuring out who is being coached by which mentor. I'll post my guesses once we're a couple days into this game.

[green_tentacle]

know your role

gnothi seauton?

[MartinM]

Posting so that I'm allowed to PM.

Likewise.

[FBM]

lol @ the weak frame-up job by whoever killed zig. I dunno who's mentoring scum team, but I bet they're retarded.

vote Don't Panic for being really interested early on in the game then not even voting. Even though he/she was lurking the thread.

I didn't vote because I didn't see Charlou as guilty and thought it would be pointless.

That's retarded. You could easily have voted for another player and given your reasons why. If you didn't think Charlou was a good choice, that means you think there are better choices out there. Sitting back and not voting doesn't help us find the werewolves.

green_tentacle: Please refrain from using insulting vocabulary with reference to other members. Here at Rationalia, we try to keep the dialogs a bit more friendly than at some other forums. If you're not sure about the atmosphere we try to cultivate and maintain, please review the rules, particularly the "Play Nice" policy. Thanks.

FBM.

[green_tentacle]

lol @ the weak frame-up job by whoever killed zig. I dunno who's mentoring scum team, but I bet they're retarded.

vote Don't Panic for being really interested early on in the game then not even voting. Even though he/she was lurking the thread.

I didn't vote because I didn't see Charlou as guilty and thought it would be pointless.

That's retarded. You could easily have voted for another player and given your reasons why. If you didn't think Charlou was a good choice, that means you think there are better choices out there. Sitting back and not voting doesn't help us find the werewolves.

green_tentacle: Please refrain from using insulting vocabulary with reference to other members. Here at Rationalia, we try to keep the dialogs a bit more friendly than at some other forums. If you're not sure about the atmosphere we try to cultivate and maintain, please review the rules, particularly the "Play Nice" policy. Thanks.

FBM.

AFAICT, criticizing an idea someone has is very different from criticizing the person themselves.

[Bartholomew Roberts]

lol @ the weak frame-up job by whoever killed zig. I dunno who's mentoring scum team, but I bet they're retarded.

vote Don't Panic for being really interested early on in the game then not even voting. Even though he/she was lurking the thread.

I didn't vote because I didn't see Charlou as guilty and thought it would be pointless.

That's retarded. You could easily have voted for another player and given your reasons why. If you didn't think Charlou was a good choice, that means you think there are better choices out there. Sitting back and not voting doesn't help us find the werewolves.

green_tentacle: Please refrain from using insulting vocabulary with reference to other members. Here at Rationalia, we try to keep the dialogs a bit more friendly than at some other forums. If you're not sure about the atmosphere we try to cultivate and maintain, please review the rules, particularly the "Play Nice" policy. Thanks.

FBM.

vote FBM

[FBM]

AFAICT, criticizing an idea someone has is very different from criticizing the person themselves.

You're exactly right. Please be careful to make the distinction clear. It hasn't been clear to everyone. Thanks and enjoy.


(I'm only blue here because I want to make it clear that I'm not playing the game.)

[Bartholomew Roberts]

AFAICT, criticizing an idea someone has is very different from criticizing the person themselves.

You're exactly right. Please be careful to make the distinction clear. It hasn't been clear to everyone. Thanks and enjoy.


(I'm only blue here because I want to make it clear that I'm not playing the game.)

vote FBM

[Bartholomew Roberts]

haha the distinction hasn't been made clear to everybody.

so you mean somebody actually reported that? man. crybabies.

[green_tentacle]

AFAICT, criticizing an idea someone has is very different from criticizing the person themselves.

You're exactly right. Please be careful to make the distinction clear. It hasn't been clear to everyone. Thanks and enjoy.


(I'm only blue here because I want to make it clear that I'm not playing the game.)

That's retarded =/= You're retarded.

Jesus christ, not only is this stupid, but you're actually interfering with gameplay. Go you.