Give us a seminar, lecture or lesson on what your 'thing' is. Now with our exclusive ASK-A-NERD!!!
-
CJ
- Posts: 8436
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
- Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Post
by CJ » Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:14 pm
Moss. As shot and cropped but not enlarged or reduced.
Right mouse > view image it's BIG!

-
Taryn
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:27 am
- Location: Miles away...........................
-
Contact:
Post
by Taryn » Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:23 am
Thanks for all your comments, they have bee really helpful.
I'm glad everybody preferred pic 2, that's the one I thought was best as well.
I used to be quite confident about cropping until I started reading some recently acquired books on the subject. I seem to have ended up more confused than informed.
I see what you mean about the fly CJ, I didn't even consider that the way the fly was facing could have such an impact . Maybe that is why I felt it just didn't look right no matter which way I did it. I can see now how that affects the way it should be cropped.
-
Taryn
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:27 am
- Location: Miles away...........................
-
Contact:
Post
by Taryn » Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:40 pm
CJ wrote:What a 10megapixel sensor will allow.
Full frame
Eye close up
Eye lashes 693 pixels across resized to 650 pixels wide
Sigma 180mm f3.5 Macro. 1/320 sec @ f3.5
That is amazing.......and I want a new camera now.

-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
-
Contact:
Post
by FBM » Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:16 am
CJ wrote:What a 10megapixel sensor will allow...
Sigma 180mm f3.5 Macro. 1/320 sec @ f3.5
A couple of months ago, a old g'friend/f-buddy who is a professional photographer gave me a FujiFilm FinePix S2Pro. For free.

I downloaded the manual and have been studying and experimenting, with mixed results. One thing that escapes me so far is that the specs first say "6.17 million effective image pixels" and immediately thereafter says "Over 12 million recorded image pixels (4256 x 2848 pixels)". So...wtf? How many pixels am I working with?
btw, thanks for this thread!
DSCF00081.jpg
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
-
Contact:
Post
by FBM » Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:47 am
Got it! Now it's up to me to figure out how to put it to good use. Many thanks!

"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
CJ
- Posts: 8436
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
- Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Post
by CJ » Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:53 am
FBM wrote:
Got it! Now it's up to me to figure out how to put it to good use. Many thanks!

Practice, practice and practice. Go and find an object and run the camera through it's paces and observe the results. For example use the aperture priority mode and set the aperture to it's widest point (3.5?) and take a shot, close down the aperture ( let in less light) (f4) do this through the whole rang of apertures. Do this whole process across a range of zoom settings and look at the results. What do you see?
AFTER you have done this read this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture
-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
-
Contact:
Post
by FBM » Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:03 am
CJ wrote:FBM wrote:
Got it! Now it's up to me to figure out how to put it to good use. Many thanks!

Practice, practice and practice. Go and find an object and run the camera through it's paces and observe the results. For example use the aperture priority mode and set the aperture to it's widest point (3.5?) and take a shot, close down the aperture ( let in less light) (f4) do this through the whole rang of apertures. Do this whole process across a range of zoom settings and look at the results. What do you see?
AFTER you have done this read this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture
OK. I'm not in the right time/place to do it right now, but when I am I'll go through the steps you described, then check out the wiki link. Muchas gracias once again! The detail in your exposures is breathtaking.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
CJ
- Posts: 8436
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
- Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Post
by CJ » Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:13 am
FBM wrote:The detail in your exposures is breathtaking.
The detail is down specifically to the type of lens used. It is a true macro lens (as opposed to just being close focus which is often touted as macro). To be called a true macro lens the lens must produce an image on the film (or digital sensor) which is the the same size (or larger) as the real object.
Good old Wiki is good for this sort of thing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_photography
-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
-
Contact:
Post
by FBM » Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:46 am
DSCF0093-1.jpg
Good info. That explains why the lens I have (28-80mm 1:3.5-5.6) won't do some of the things I try to get it to. My limitations aside, that is. (Time limitations, too. Lots of overtime this semester.) There are plenty of interesting subjects to photograph here in Korea and I'd like to develop the skills to take advantage of them.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
CJ
- Posts: 8436
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
- Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Post
by CJ » Sun Apr 05, 2009 2:27 pm
A 28-80mm is a basic workhorse lens and just right to learn on.
-
Taryn
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:27 am
- Location: Miles away...........................
-
Contact:
Post
by Taryn » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:10 am
I will have about £500 to spend on a new camera in a couple of weeks time. At the moment I have a Fujifim FinePix S6500fd and I'm hoping to upgrade to a DSLR. I have no idea which one to get and am now getting totally lost in the specs........why can't they all use the same units.

-
CJ
- Posts: 8436
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
- Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Post
by CJ » Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:02 am
Taryn wrote:I will have about £500 to spend on a new camera in a couple of weeks time. At the moment I have a Fujifim FinePix S6500fd and I'm hoping to upgrade to a DSLR. I have no idea which one to get and am now getting totally lost in the specs........why can't they all use the same units.

£500 on a DSLR will get you a good body with a very basic lens! In terms a close focus work you will actually have worse capability than you current camera! Don't buy anything without comparing the spec of your existing camera with the new one. It's the lens that counts and a good Macro starts at £300, Tamron 90mm f2.8 or Sigma 105mm f2.8 are both good lenses.
-
CJ
- Posts: 8436
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
- Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Post
by CJ » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:39 pm
Canon EOS1000D @ £310 + 60mm f2.8 @ £290 = £600 for a system.
Plus memory cards from 7DayShop.com
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests