Spooks, Day 1-7.

[Animavore]

Remember who voted for me yesterday?

For Animavore:
Born-again-atheist
Ghatanothoa
Higgs2

The FOS needs to be pointed at them. One of them already turned out to be scum. Ghat voted for me out of nowhere. Just signed on and voted. The scum saw that I was acting wreckless and suspicious and saw it as an opportunity to get an innocent. Vote Ghat.

I don't like voting for myself but I'm the ony one I trust right now.
Vote Animavore

This almost makes mewant to change my vote back to you. Why should we not vote to lynch you, Animavore?

You're the one here who is under suspicion. Either you're with proven scum who clearly singled me out because I was loud (and in doing so falling for my ruse) or you're and innocent who, upon listening to scum make cases against me, were won over by their argument. Either way you have amountain to climb.

Can you see the flaw in your logic? IF YOU ARE TOWN, then yesterday's bandwagon was between two town players. Scum wouldn't have cared which one of you got lynched as long as town was lynched. Scum are as likely to have voted for Charlou as for you. I'm guessing that scum are happy to leave you in the game as long as you keep throwing chum in the water and distracting town.

I disagree. Charlou votes didn't happen 'til after me. Votes for me were initiated by scum but once the tide turned towards Charlou they didn't care.

[oblivion]

Can you see the flaw in your logic? IF YOU ARE TOWN, then yesterday's bandwagon was between two town players. Scum wouldn't have cared which one of you got lynched as long as town was lynched. Scum are as likely to have voted for Charlou as for you. I'm guessing that scum are happy to leave you in the game as long as you keep throwing chum in the water and distracting town.

I disagree. Charlou votes didn't happen 'til after me. Votes for me were initiated by scum but once the tide turned towards Charlou they didn't care.

Aside from the occasional maverick, scum generally don't start bandwagons. They play it safe and come in after a couple of votes are already down. That's why looking at players who consistently come in with 3rd or 4th vote on bandwagons stand out as potential scum. Also, savvy scum won't hesitate to throw a scum player under the bus once there are a couple of votes on them. If Charlou had flipped scum, we would have gotten some interesting info out of the late switches to her. As it is, not so much.

[Animavore]

Can you see the flaw in your logic? IF YOU ARE TOWN, then yesterday's bandwagon was between two town players. Scum wouldn't have cared which one of you got lynched as long as town was lynched. Scum are as likely to have voted for Charlou as for you. I'm guessing that scum are happy to leave you in the game as long as you keep throwing chum in the water and distracting town.

I disagree. Charlou votes didn't happen 'til after me. Votes for me were initiated by scum but once the tide turned towards Charlou they didn't care.

Aside from the occasional maverick, scum generally don't start bandwagons. They play it safe and come in after a couple of votes are already down. That's why looking at players who consistently come in with 3rd or 4th vote on bandwagons stand out as potential scum. Also, savvy scum won't hesitate to throw a scum player under the bus once there are a couple of votes on them. If Charlou had flipped scum, we would have gotten some interesting info out of the late switches to her. As it is, not so much.

Which adequately describes the point when BAA and Ghat joined the lynch vote for me. After they were already heading that way.

[Animavore]

It was actually Higgs2 started the vote toward me because he thought my vengeance vote was scum.

[J.A.Poisson]

For the lynch;

Ghatanothoa 4
Magicziggy 2
Sifaka 1

For mayor;

Twinkie 4
Redial 3
Animavore 1

5 hours 10 minutes til nightfall

[higgs2]

No, I didn't have a stroke, animavore, I was in a hurry. Who are your three picks for scum and why?

[Animavore]

No, I didn't have a stroke, animavore, I was in a hurry. Who are your three picks for scum and why?

Only person I have now is ghat for suspiciously jumping on the band-wagon against me.
Sisfaka is quite absent but it may not mean anything.
Everyone else is equally suspicious to me.

PS. Glad you wrote back. I was just about to ring an ambulance.

[Azathoth]

So I'm being voted for because I didn't vote for the town player. Nice play guys. I'm just a standard analyst. No special powers but completely innocent. If you want to lose more town feel free to lynch me but take a good look at who is voting for me. For now I'm sticking with the flailing shite flinging monkey and his revenge votes.

Vote animavore

[Animavore]

revenge votes.

Coming from tit for tat boy.

[higgs2]

It was actually Higgs2 started the vote toward me because he thought my vengeance vote was scum.

And there you are wrong. I was the 4th to vote on you, I didnot "start the vote toward you".

Lynch all liars
unvote vote Animavore

[Animavore]

It's not a good idea to lose more town at this stage.

[oblivion]

Can you see the flaw in your logic? IF YOU ARE TOWN, then yesterday's bandwagon was between two town players. Scum wouldn't have cared which one of you got lynched as long as town was lynched. Scum are as likely to have voted for Charlou as for you. I'm guessing that scum are happy to leave you in the game as long as you keep throwing chum in the water and distracting town.

I disagree. Charlou votes didn't happen 'til after me. Votes for me were initiated by scum but once the tide turned towards Charlou they didn't care.

Aside from the occasional maverick, scum generally don't start bandwagons. They play it safe and come in after a couple of votes are already down. That's why looking at players who consistently come in with 3rd or 4th vote on bandwagons stand out as potential scum. Also, savvy scum won't hesitate to throw a scum player under the bus once there are a couple of votes on them. If Charlou had flipped scum, we would have gotten some interesting info out of the late switches to her. As it is, not so much.

Which adequately describes the point when BAA and Ghat joined the lynch vote for me. After they were already heading that way.

Meph put the first vote on you and then retracted it. After that BAA put the first vote on you that stuck. I guess that makes him a maverick. Ghat's vote came right after that. It's possible that two scum players would pile on at once. Not likely, but possible.

Redial's posts yesterday still really bother me. Magiczippy has dropped some tells yesterday and today. Is this really his first game?

[Animavore]

Ghat or Ziggy are the ones to look at.

I iz innocent.

[higgs2]

It's not always bad to lose a townperson. If they hinder more than they help, than sometimes that decisioun must be made.

[Animavore]

It's not always bad to lose a townperson. If they hinder more than they help, than sometimes that decisioun must be made.

Quiet you.

Silly person.