If you wouldn't mind, please stop with the "responding in red" - respond in the proper form please. It is difficult to engage in a discussion when you change the normal method of post-response to a color scheme.Galaxian wrote:The braying continues, eh? Such inane remarks as the following. Galaxian's response in REDThe rest of your inane post is more of your febrile imagination. Do you have a temperature? Might be bird(brain) flu!Coito ergo sum wrote:Well, like Galaxian said, it's not really a commercial airliner. It's a non-commercial airplane. Apparently, it was fitted with a pod to fire missiles. So YOU assume it was a missile pod. Then why wasn't it fired? The instant before it struck the tower, a missile was fired If so, then where is the exhaust of the missile or the image of it re;easing & miving forward?which caused the instantaneous flash of white light as it impacted Missiles do NOT cause a flash of light upon impact, neither do planes. They explode upon impact (or after depending on the fuse setting). Watch some missile impact clips. .klr wrote:Riiiight ... the "bulky pod" that just happens to look like what the main undercarriage bay fairing would look like when viewed from a certain angle and in a certain light, when moving at speed.What lazy bullshit you spout. Have you even bothered looking at photos of similar planes?
So, how did they manage to attach this ... er ... pod ... thing ... to the belly of an airliner, and take off, without anyone noticing? were you asleep through the previous posts? Did you bother watching the videos I posted?...No, of course you didn't. It's too taxing on the brain!
I'm not sure why they had to go through all this trouble, though, since also according to Galaxian, the building was brought down by a controlled demolition Not quite. Galaxian said that they could NOT have come down as they did by natural collapse. In other words, controlled demolition is, by far, the more likely scenario. But, nevertheless, that is Galaxian's argument. The buildings were brought down by a controlled demolition, but the buildings were also hit by noncommercial planes made to look like airlines but fitted with military missile pods underneath in order to fire a missile at the exact instant that the nose of the plane was hitting the wall of the tower. And, the US military "must have" ordered the air defense to "stand down" so as not to intercept these noncommercial planes that were actually controlled by the same people who rigged the airplanes to fire the missiles as they struck the towers.
By the way - the towers fell and did not look anything like a controlled demolition. One would not expect the towers to fall as they did if it was a controlled demolition. It's not only not "more likely" to have been a controlled demolition, it's obviously not the case. I've seen controlled demolitions in person, and I posted the video to the closest comparison we have - the Hudson's building. That controlled demolition looks nothing at all like the WTC. Don't you agree?