Biological Recording (With Photos)

Post Reply
User avatar
Calilasseia
Butterfly
Butterfly
Posts: 5272
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
Contact:

Biological Recording (With Photos)

Post by Calilasseia » Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:27 pm

For some years now I have been a volunteer entomological recorder. Basically, I visit various sites, and count the insect species that occur on those sites. During the daytime, my focus is, naturally enough, centred upon butterflies, but I'll record other insect species of interest for other members of the Entomology Society, in order to encourage them to visit my chosen sites and perform biological assays thereof.

Well, the 2010 recording season has started. And, straight out of the box, so to speak, I found butterflies!

I also found some interesting wild flowers, and for once, managed to get the wild flowers and most of the butterflies on film!

However, a little preamble is necessary. The site in question is Pickerings Pasture Local Nature Reserve (LNR for short), which those familiar with Landranger Ordnance Survey maps will find centred upon SJ487836, which is the approximate location of the Visitor Centre. The reserve achieved Green Flag status back in 2005 or thereabouts, and has been managed with wildlife conservation in mind since the late 1980s. There are four principal parts of the reserve that I survey, which are marked out on annotated OS maps as recording transects. In short, a recording transect is a well-defined route that a biological recorder surveys for organisms of interest, with well defined start and end points that, if possible, are associated with Ordnance Survey grid references. The four transects that I survey are:

[1] Back of River Towpath (BRT for short): this is a 1.25 Km stretch of footpath adjoining the railings separating the reserve from the nearby timber yard. It's separated from the adjacent Waterfront transect (see [2] below) by a line of various trees, including White Poplar, Swedish Hornbeam, Alder Buckthorn, Aspen, Goat Willow, and at least two species of Oak, along with Field Maple, and the occasional Ash tree. Tall shrubs found growing here include Gorse, Broom, Russian Dogwood, and (regrettably in the minds of some), Sea Buckthorn, though this was planted with the stabilisation of the riverbank and the soil layer in mind.

[2] Waterfront (WF for short): this is a 1.25 Km stretch of footpath following the riverbank, running parallel to the Back of River Towpath transect above, but at an elevation some 3-4 metres lower. Separation of these two transects is approximately 10 metres. At the north east extremity of the transect is a footbridge, constructed some time ago to connect the reserve to the Pennine Way (see photograph below), whilst the south-east extremity adjoins a managed meadow that is devoted to Cowslips, which in turn is adjoined at its northern boundary by a managed cornfield, intended to represent agricultural land in the days before mechanised agriculture and the extensive use of agrochemicals.

[3] Wet Meadow (WM for short): sunken tracts of waterlogged land that is home to various marsh and wetland plants. The transect was originally a looped path of approximately 400-500 metres length, but the section where the Yellow Irises grow is now impassable because of Brambles, so the original route is having to be rearranged somewhat to take account of this. During heavy rainfall, this section becomes a quagmire if you're not prepared with the correct footwear!

[4] Far Summer Meadow (FSM for short): occupies the SE extremity of the reserve, and adjoins a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), where various wading birds breed. This meadow only attracts significant insect populations from June onwards, when the meadow flowers appear, and is only surveyed during June to September. There is a bird hide adjacent to the SSSI, which faces west to south-west over the SSSI, and from which other views of the Liverpool and Birkenhead section of the Mersey can be photographed.

An annotated satellite image of the reserve, with the transects labelled, can be viewed by clicking on this thumbnail:

Image

Now that you've all gained some idea of what the reserve is like on the large scale, it's time to wheel out some photographs!

First, here's some shots of the locality, taken back in January 2010. These two depict Runcorn Bridge, which is clearly visible from the Pickerings Pasture LNR, as the reserve includes a 2Km or so stretch of the north bank of the River Mersey, and the footbridge that was built a few years back to facilitate connecting the reserve to other parts of the Pennine Way:

Image

Image

Somewhere, I have shots of that footbridge being constructed, which I can dig up at some point in the future if anyone wants to see them, including the honking big crane that was used to lift the footbridge into place when it was being constructed. But I digress ... now, here's a couple of shots of the bird feeder that hangs near the bird hide, first with some Tits in attendance (there's a Blue Tit feeding, and a Great Tit waiting in the queue), second with a Greenfinch in attendance (both taken in January 2010).

Image

Image

Now, on to the shots I took yesterday!

First, I'll cover the wild flowers. These two shots show specimens of Common Primrose, Primula vulgaris, the first growing on the BRT transect, the second on the WF transect:

Image

Image

Next, here's a fine specimen of Germander Speedwell, Veronica chamaedrys, a member of the Scrophulariaceae, to which Foxgloves also belong. Though the difference between the two is enormous - Germander Speedwells are low, creeping plants that grow no higher than, say, 10 cm, whilst Foxgloves can tower up to 1.5 metres above ground level! Germander Speedwells cover parts of the reserve in a carpet of blue in Spring and early Summer, and tend to produce their flowers in patchy clusters. The small size of these flowers (they're about the size of my index fingernail, or perhaps a bit smaller) makes them a challenge to photograph well, especially when the camera batteries are starting to run low! Despite the appearance of this photo, I didn't use fill in flash for the shot, the sunshine was beaming directly onto the flowers, and whited them out somewhat (for some reason, my camera didn't stop down automatically to compensate - next time I'll photograph these in full manual mode with the lens stopped down more).

Image

Next, Lesser Celandine, Ranunculus ficaria. Yes, it's in the same Genus as Buttercups, but looks very different. For one thing, these flowers have at least 8, and sometimes as many as 12, petals, whilst other members of the Genus only have 5. Closely related to these are the Water Crowfoots (Genus Ranunculus, Subgenus Batrachium), which are aquatic or semi=aquatic plants with 5-petalled white flowers, which grow in ponds (there's some nice ones growing at another of my survey sites). First of these shots was taken at the WF transect, second at the WM transect.

Image

Image

And now, it's time for the butterflies!

Sadly, the two Small Tortoiseshells, and the Small White I saw, weren't in the mood to pose for the camera. But, the good news is, that the two butterflies that DID pose for the camera were the two most spectacular springtime butterflies on the reserve! Both posed for pictures quite happily, in between jousting with each other in territorial disputes on the WF transect.

First, the Peacock, Inachis io. I secured two shots of this handsome butterfly, and I think you'll agree it's one of the finest members of the British fauna:

Image

Image

However, the BIG event of my recording session was finding THIS handsome insect:

Image

This is the Comma, Polygonia c-album, a species that has had a very interesting history over the past 200 years or so. Back in the 19th century, for reasons that still remain unexplained to this day (though numerous hypotheses are extant), the population of this species underwent a catastrophic crash, and disappeared from almost all of its old haunts in the UK. Eventually, the species was restricted to a small nucleus of individuals living in and around the New Forest, and British entomologists began to lament ever seeing this species in good numbers from that point on. Then, equally inexplicably, in 1945, the population began an equally sudden and spectacular expansion, moving out from its New Forest haunts into south west England and south-east England, before beginning a relentless expansion northwards. By the time 1990 arrived, the butterfly had been recorded in numbers in Cheshire, and was established as a breeding butterfly in the south of the county, but had not yet crossed the River Mersey in sufficient numbers to establish a breeding population on the north bank of the river. It was in 1990 that I saw my first ever specimen of this butterfly at the reserve, but sadly, I didn't have a decent camera to commemorate the fact. In 1993, I visited the reserve, with my first decent SLR in tow, and had a disastrous time trying to capture the species on film, leading me to wonder if I would ever be successful. In 1994 and 1995, the butterfly failed to show at the reserve, but then , in 1996, I secured my first good quality photograph of this species, and in 1997, the species was firmly established as a breeding species on the reserve. It has since expanded northwards to the point where it can now be found in parts of Scotland. To give you an idea how much it has expanded its range, consider that in the 19th century, it was effectively confined to the New Forest, one tiny dot on the UK distribution maps, and now, it can be found at every one of the dots on this map.

The Comma is a special favourite of mine, because in bright sunshine, a newly emerged specimen is resplendent in appearance - it glows like a hot coal, with vibrant colour, and the species exists in two forms, whose colouration is determined by larval light exposure. The typical form is fairly dark-hued, and arises from larvae that feed in late Summer, when the day length is slowly shortening- these adults go on to hibernate over the winter, re-emerging in the spring, mating, and then producing a Spring brood of larvae. These larvae, subject to increasing day length, sometimes produce a truly resplendent, bright-hued insect, known taxonomically as f. hutchinsoni, and are named after a certain Miss Emma Hutchinson, who studied these butterflies in the 19th century. She alighted upon the day length factor as being important in the production of bright-hued insects, and thus the bright colour form is named after her.

By the way, these butterflies are very strong and accomplished aeronauts, and seem to delight in playing "chicken" with human passers by - the butterflies will fly toward you, at eye level, approaching at what appears to be collision speed, only to swerve to one side at the very last moment. If disturbed from their perching places, they take off as if they are rocket propelled, but prefer to rely upon the sombre underwing camouflage, which makes the resting butterfly look like a dead leaf. Close examination will reveal a small white marking on the underside, shaped like a comma punctuation mark, from which the butterfly derives its common name. There are several species of Polygonia butterfly native to the Americas, one of which, Polygonia interrogationis, is known as the Question Mark, because it too has a white marking on the underside that resembles the appropriate punctuation character. Several of the North American relatives of the Comma can be found as far north as Canada and Alaska, and share the same upperside markings as the British species, making precise identification a task for a trained eye.

So, there you have it. The results of my first day's entomological recording for 2010. Enjoy!

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: Biological Recording (With Photos)

Post by hackenslash » Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:56 pm

Fantastic! Not only that, you have just decided for me where we'll be going for our wander this weekend. I've been nearby lots of times, but have never actually gone for a walkabout there. :cheers:
Dogma is the death of the intellect

User avatar
Calilasseia
Butterfly
Butterfly
Posts: 5272
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
Contact:

Re: Biological Recording (With Photos)

Post by Calilasseia » Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:01 pm

In which case, you might very well bump into me while I'm recording. I usually try to hit the reserve sometime after 1pm, and I've usually finished by the time 4pm comes up. I'll be pretty easy to spot if you're there at the same time as me. :)

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: Biological Recording (With Photos)

Post by hackenslash » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:25 pm

I'm sure I'll have no trouble spotting the big blue butterfly with the camera. :mrgreen:
Dogma is the death of the intellect

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Biological Recording (With Photos)

Post by Feck » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:53 pm

Calli there were Comma (s) in Aberdeen last year

and the bees have mites


Image
Last edited by Feck on Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Calilasseia
Butterfly
Butterfly
Posts: 5272
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
Contact:

Re: Biological Recording (With Photos)

Post by Calilasseia » Tue Apr 13, 2010 6:43 am

The distribution map I posted a link to has data up to 2004. Doesn't surprise me that Commas have been found in Aberdeen, because they've been moving northwards along the eastern side of the UK faster than along the western side. Chances are that they'll be in Inverness this year or next, and will probably reach Thurso before the decade is out, provided there are enough nettles along their expansion route to provide their larvae with food. As of 2004, they had yet to reach Glasgow, but I suspect that they're probably in the area now, or will be in the next couple of years, but because the line of expansion slopes about 45° downwards east to west, it'll probably be about 10 years before they reach Fort William.

The same pattern of expansion can be seen here for the Essex Skipper, Thymelicus lineola, which is expanding northwards too. Its expansion is again fastest along the east coast, and the angle of inclination of the expansion line is even steeper. Because the Essex Skipper is a grass-feeding species, it's spreading along the motorway network, and since most of the continuous grass verges along British motorways are found on the eastern side of the country (the M1 is a prime example), the species is making its way along the M1, and making a push into east Yorkshire via that route. What's blocking its westward progress is the huge industrial conurbation of Birmingham, which it has to skirt around the edges of before it can start following the M6 northwards to Cheshire and Merseyside, but since the data on that map is only current to 2004, chances are there may be some Essex Skippers turning up in my locality this year, because according to a couple of people I've spoken to in my Entomology Society, the species has been spotted in southern Cheshire last year.

Likewise, this distribution map for the White Admiral, Limentis camilla, shows the same 45° slope of its expansion line. Again, that map is current to 2004, and the White Admiral has again been spotted in the south of Cheshire in the past couple of years, so it's possible that the species may reach my locality this year or next.

As for your bees, the photo was a bit blurred, and I couldn't tell what bee species I was looking at. If those orange globules on the right hand side of that bee are the mites in question, that's a heavy infestation. I'll have to check which mites infest bumblebees, as the bee in your photo looks like a bumblebee of some sort.

User avatar
Calilasseia
Butterfly
Butterfly
Posts: 5272
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
Contact:

Re: Biological Recording (With Photos)

Post by Calilasseia » Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:16 am

And now for some more pics. Taken earlier today (17.iv.2010) ...

[1] Summer Snowflake, Leucojum aestivum, from BRT transect :

Image

[2] and [3] Common Primrose, Primula vulgaris, from WF transect :

Image

Image

[4] Peacock, Inachis io, WF transect (slightly blurred but shows the eye spots on the wings nicely) :

Image

[5], [6] and [7] Lichens growing on trunk of an Alder tree in the car park near the visitor centre - the second of these looks a bit like a map of England and Wales in shape ...

Image

Image

Image

[8] and [9] Oxford Ragwort, Senecio squalidus agg., growing on the road leading to the reserve :

Image

Image

This plant is distinguished from the Common Ragwort, Senecio jacobaea, on several counts. One, Oxford Ragwort flowers much earlier - Common Ragwort isn't due to flower until June. Two, Oxford Ragwort looks much 'cleaner' in appearance, as though someone has given it a shower and rinsed the dirt off its leaves, whereas Common Ragwort looks 'dusty' even after heavy rainfall has washed its leaves. Three, Oxford Ragwort has fairly angular pinnate serrations to its leaves, with a sharply pointed leaf terminus, whilst Common Ragwort has rounded pinnate lobes. Fourth, each infloresence (it's a daisy-like Composite) of Oxford Ragwort is slightly smaller than that of Common Ragwort - a typical Oxford Ragwort inflorescence will not exceed 20mm in diameter, whilst that of Common Ragwort will reach 25mm. Fifth, the two plants are of different height - Oxford Ragwort will usually not exceed 60 cm in height, though occasional specimens may reach 80 cm, whilst Common Ragwort can grow to be 1.5 metres in height. Sixth, Oxford Ragwort is a naturalised introduction from southern Italy, whilst Common Ragwort has been a native British wild flower since at least the Pleistocene.

Oh, and in order to provide an appetiser for the future, I'll briefly deal with the four species of orchid we have on the reserve, which I hope to provide photos of later. Three of these are members of the Genus Dactylorhiza. Two of these are Common Spotted Orchid, Dactylorhiza fuchsii, and Heath Spotted Orchid, Dactylorhiza maculata. The spots referred to in the common names, incidentally, are on the leaves. Both of these can be found at the Wet Meadow, though they've spread to some other parts of the reserve as well. One of the weirder aspects of their presence here is that they can sometimes be found growing side by side, despite the fact that fuchsii prefers alkaline soils, whilst maculata prefers acid, peaty soils. The flowers of both of these are pink, and grow in clustered spikes upon a single flower stem rising centrally from the corolla of leaves at the base of the plant. The third Dactylorhiza species on the reserve is Southern Marsh Orchid, Dactylorhiza praetermissa, which apart from having no spots on its leaves, usually has somewhat darker flowers that are more intensely magenta than pink.

Finally, the fourth orchid we have growing on the reserve is the Bee Orchid, Ophrys apifera, whose flowers mimic female bumblebees. The flowers persuade bumblebees to pollinate them by providing male bumblebees with an attractive looking (and always receptive) mimic of a female bumblebee, and male bumblebees duly accept the invitation to engage in a spot of copulation. Only trouble is, the male's efforts are wasted from the standpoint of procreation of his own species: instead, when attending to one mimic, he is covered in pollen, which he then duly delivers to the next Bee Orchid that he copulates with. Bee Orchids even produce pheromones resembling those of a female bee, in order to enhance the mimicry.

Hopefully I'll have some shots of these to provide from late May onwards. However, be advised that Bee Orchids exhibit a strange pattern of appearance, sometimes appearing in large numbers in an area, then seemingly disappearing for several years, before making a comeback. The presence of Bee Orchids is critically coupled to that of a mycorrhizal fungus, which becomes intimately entangled with the roots of the orchid, and without which the plant will not grow. Indeed, the intimacy of the entanglement is sub-cellular - the fungus will send out hyphal shoots that penetrate individual orchid root cells. The relationship is a mutualist one - the orchid obtains more minerals, courtesy of the spread of the fungal hyphae, whilst the fungus obtains processed carbon in the form of carbohydrates from the plant, that it would otherwise have to expend energy producing itself. If the mycorrhizal fungus is only sparsely present, then the orchid's seeds will not germinate, and on occasions, death of stretches of mycorrhizal fungus will result in the orchids disappearing from that stretch of soil, only reappearing when the fungus returns.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests