Questions for Mandy

Holy Crap!
Post Reply
User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:19 pm

Animavore wrote:
FBM wrote:
Animavore wrote:Keep digging you fucking knob end.

MOD MODE: Ani, you know that name-calling is unacceptable. Let's steer away from that. Thanks.
Fuck him. Anyone who would stick up for a paedophile is mentally retarded.
Ani, keep it under control, please.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
mandy
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:21 pm
About me: This picture is not mine.
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by mandy » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:03 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:

Animavore wrote:
FBM wrote:
Animavore wrote:
Keep digging you fucking knob end.

MOD MODE: Ani, you know that name-calling is unacceptable. Let's steer away from that. Thanks.
Fuck him. Anyone who would stick up for a paedophile is mentally retarded.

Ani, keep it under control, please.
what !! fuck the moderators? :shock:

hey MOD, its ok, let Animavore call me whatever he likes. allow him to let off some steam. i dont mind.
he is just pretending to be on a moral high horse. its strange to see an atheist on one.
he dont know what moral values are. he just goes with what is legal.
when the government makes it legal and lowers the age of marriage, he will cool down. at the moment he is slave of the current legal statutes. he just wants to please his pedo mates at the pub. :mrgreen:

i bet he would have said the same thing about gays back in 1955 when sodomy was illegal and gays were hatred.

islam is a stable ideology. its morals are fixed. it doesnt change with times, its legal laws dont alter every two decades.



___________________________________________________
Last edited by mandy on Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
________________________________________________________
... news that muslims trust http://www.presstv.com and http://www.tehrantimes.com

User avatar
Azathoth
blind idiot god
blind idiot god
Posts: 9418
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by Azathoth » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:06 pm

So according to your logic it is quite alright to fuck a child if her parents consent but not alright for two consenting adult males to fuck each other. Do you really not see the problem here or are you just taking the piss?
Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.

Code: Select all

// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis 
   $str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);

User avatar
mandy
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:21 pm
About me: This picture is not mine.
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by mandy » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:08 pm

I dont have a problem if they want to screw each other with parents consent.
i wouldnt do it, and i dont like it, but they can do it all night if they like it.
________________________________________________________
... news that muslims trust http://www.presstv.com and http://www.tehrantimes.com

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:10 pm

mandelson wrote:what !! fuck the moderators? :shock:

hey MOD, its ok, let Animavore call me whatever he likes. allow him to let off some steam. i dont mind.
he is just pretending to be on a moral high horse. its strange to see an atheist on one.
he dont know what moral values are. he just goes with what is legal.
when the government makes it legal and lowers the age of marriage, he will cool down. at the moment he is slave of the current legal statutes. he just wants to please his pedo mates at the pub. :mrgreen:

i bet he would have said the same thing about gays back in 1955 when sodomy was illegal and gays were hatred.

islam is a stable ideology. its morals are fixed. it doesnt change with times, its legal laws dont alter every two decades.



___________________________________________________
We have a flexible moderation policy, especially when a member gets understandably upset by obvious trolling.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by FBM » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:12 pm

mandelson wrote:what !! fuck the moderators? :shock:

hey MOD, its ok, let Animavore call me whatever he likes. allow him to let off some steam. i dont mind.


First of all, it's not your choice. We don't allow personal attacks, even from people we agree with.

he is just pretending to be on a moral high horse. its strange to see an atheist on one.
he dont know what moral values are. he just goes with what is legal.

Juxtapose this with:
when the government makes it legal and lowers the age of marriage, he will cool down. at the moment he is slave of the current legal statutes. he just wants to please his pedo mates at the pub. :mrgreen:

i bet he would have said the same thing about gays back in 1955 when sodomy was illegal and gays were hatred.

islam is a stable ideology. its morals are fixed. it doesnt change with times, its legal laws dont alter every two decades.
this. Who's contradicting themselves? That would be you. You simultaneously belittle Ani over an imaginary fixation on legality, then praise your own fantasy-based thought system for its own archaic and draconian laws. Go figure.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
mandy
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:21 pm
About me: This picture is not mine.
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by mandy » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:18 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
mandelson wrote:
what !! fuck the moderators? :shock:

hey MOD, its ok, let Animavore call me whatever he likes. allow him to let off some steam. i dont mind.
he is just pretending to be on a moral high horse. its strange to see an atheist on one.
he dont know what moral values are. he just goes with what is legal.
when the government makes it legal and lowers the age of marriage, he will cool down. at the moment he is slave of the current legal statutes. he just wants to please his pedo mates at the pub. :mrgreen:

i bet he would have said the same thing about gays back in 1955 when sodomy was illegal and gays were hatred.

islam is a stable ideology. its morals are fixed. it doesnt change with times, its legal laws dont alter every two decades.

We have a flexible moderation policy, especially when a member gets understandably upset by obvious trolling.

I think Animavore is pissed off at the fact that family values and parental rights given by Allah are superior to his invented morals.

I dont believe that trolling is the reason for him losing his rational ability. He is biased atheist.
He is just upset at being caught out on an invisible moral horse. i think i spoiled his imaginary ride.

:hehe:

sorry mate.

__________________________________________
________________________________________________________
... news that muslims trust http://www.presstv.com and http://www.tehrantimes.com

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by Tigger » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:24 pm

Mandy, we are not your mates. Please stop calling people "mate". I find that insulting on a personal level, because my mates are people whose opinions I value. I don't value anything you represent. You don't need to keep using this term. Thanks.
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
mandy
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:21 pm
About me: This picture is not mine.
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by mandy » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:24 pm

no worrys mate.
________________________________________________________
... news that muslims trust http://www.presstv.com and http://www.tehrantimes.com

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by Tigger » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:31 pm

mandelson wrote:no worrys mate.
MOD NOTE: WE have a play nice rule here. I already told you on a personal level that the term "mate" offends me. Normally I would make a complaint to a moderator about your continued use of something I find personally insulting, but as I am a moderator, I don't need to.

Please read the forum rules here: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449 where you can see this:
"Play nice, please :biggrin: . Those who intentionally harass other members, openly or via private correspondence, will be penalised. Intentional malicious trolling and use of offensive language, images or jokes, with the intention of harassing, intimidating, tormenting or persecuting another member"
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by Animavore » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:34 pm

mandelson wrote:I dont have a problem if they want to screw each other with parents consent.
i wouldnt do it, and i dont like it, but they can do it all night if they like it.
You wouldn't do it? Why is that I wonder?

How about you try this. Ask someone to give them their 6 year-old daughter (good luck with that). Then bring her into a bath with you and put your knob between her thighs and work her up and down until you cum on her belly. Then ask yourself the following.

1. Did I enjoy that.
It the answer is "yes" then go to a psychiatric home immediately.
Pedophilia (or paedophilia) is a psychological disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a sexual preference for prepubescent children.[1][2] According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), pedophilia is specified as a form of paraphilia in which a person either has acted on intense sexual urges towards children, or experiences recurrent sexual urges towards and fantasies about children that cause distress or interpersonal difficulty.[3] The disorder is common among people who commit child sexual abuse;[4][5][6] however, some offenders do not meet the clinical diagnosis standards for pedophilia.[7] In strictly behavioral contexts, the word "pedophilia" has been used to refer to child sexual abuse itself, also called "pedophilic behavior"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophile

If the answer is "no in fact I feel physically repulsed by such an act" then ask yourself why that is and then ask yourself why you would allow a small minority of clearly mentally handicapped men to do the same.
mandelson wrote:I think Animavore is pissed off at the fact that family values and parental rights given by Allah are superior to his invented morals.
Don't you mean Mohammed's (shit heaped upon his name) made up family values and parental rights? Mohammed (shit heaped upon his name) was well known for changing his views on particular issues when it suited him. In fact his wives used to tease him about it.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
orpheus
Posts: 1522
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:43 am
About me: The name is Epictetus. Waldo Epictetus.
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by orpheus » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:36 pm

Manddelson, you said:
mandelson wrote:islam is a stable ideology. its morals are fixed. it doesnt change with times, its legal laws dont alter every two decades.
But then regarding homosexuality, you said:
I dont have a problem if they want to screw each other with parents consent.
i wouldnt do it, and i dont like it, but they can do it all night if they like it.
What do the laws of Islam say about homosexuality? If Islamic law (not you, not your personal feelings, but Islamic law) - if Islamic law is against it, how can you write what I quoted above and still call yourself a Muslim? It seems you disagree with Islam itself.
I think that language has a lot to do with interfering in our relationship to direct experience. A simple thing like metaphor will allows you to go to a place and say 'this is like that'. Well, this isn't like that. This is like this.

—Richard Serra

User avatar
mandy
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:21 pm
About me: This picture is not mine.
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by mandy » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:39 pm

Tigger wrote:
mandelson wrote:
no worrys mate.

MOD NOTE: WE have a play nice rule here. I already told you on a personal level that the term "mate offends me". Normally I would make a complaint to a moderator about your continued use of something I find personally insulting, but as I am a moderator, I don't need to.

what if some member uses another innocent word which i find personally offending? what then?
is it the MODS who are suppose to decide if a word is a personal attack, or can i personal decide it for myself, like you have just done?


_________________________________________
________________________________________________________
... news that muslims trust http://www.presstv.com and http://www.tehrantimes.com

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by FBM » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:41 pm

mandelson wrote:
Tigger wrote:
mandelson wrote:
no worrys mate.

MOD NOTE: WE have a play nice rule here. I already told you on a personal level that the term "mate offends me". Normally I would make a complaint to a moderator about your continued use of something I find personally insulting, but as I am a moderator, I don't need to.

what if some member uses another innocent word which i find personally offending? what then?
is it the MODS who are suppose to decide if a word is a personal attack, or can i personal decide it for myself, like you have just done?


_________________________________________

If someone keeps referring to you with a term you've already objected to in the same thread, let us know.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

Sisifo
Posts: 1252
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:35 am

Re: Questions to Muslim Mandelson

Post by Sisifo » Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:47 pm

mandelson wrote:


islam is a stable ideology. its morals are fixed. it doesnt change with times, its legal laws dont alter every two decades. [/i]


___________________________________________________
That is untrue, and a very uncouth statement. First, all religions, not just islam, are "fixed" in their ideologies. Actually, they are just a "By the will of gawd", expression of an ideology, set of customs and traditions of the certain area and time where they originated. It is because their inability to adapt to social development that they become obsolete and laughable, and that's the reason we get new religions continuously, with the same rule of just expressing their societies' current ideology trying to perpetuate it.

Second, Islam is a particularly mutable religion regarding its law, as it allows a continuous set of ulemas to reinterpretate the texts, and validate, or invalidate former ulemas. If Islam is the way it is now, it is because recent saint wisemen have decided to harden it, again as an expression of current social and political ideologies in the Middle East. Islam was not like this 20 years ago, not to say 30, 40 or 100 years ago.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests