LaMont Cranston wrote:what is atheism...the anorexic all gussied up and walking around in a cocktail dress?
Empirically speaking, atheism really does carry the minimum of meat on its bones. It's not about whether the bone is big or not, LaMont, it's what you do with it that counts. See the opening scenes of Kubrick's film "2001: A Space Odyssey".
It all depends on what you're trying to do with the bones. For some applications, less meat is better. A self-proclaimed street-fighter ought to know the provenance of bare-knuckle boxing, which is not particularly about love and kindness, but more about "understanding". The sweet science.
I'm much more interested in whether or not people have kindness, love and understanding in their hearts.
Really. If the bone you're swinging is not very big, and the bone that others are swinging is bigger, you hope that others are swinging softly and carrying a big shtick.
This one is a double-edged sword, especially for those who say that "God exists regardless of the need for Him". And then claim that they have achieved a definition of what it is to "exist".