You don't know shit about "quote mining". There's no quote mining when I'm merely pointing exactly to what I disagree, when your fucking post is on top of mine, and I have not misrepresented your views.Chauncey Gardner wrote:you're quote mining luis diasLuis Dias wrote:He DOESN'T have to know "everything" to know that Dawkins and Josh treated everyone as imbeciles. That's a fucking ridiculous demand of yours. He just has to read what was put forth to him. Like I have. I felt insulted by both condescending "messages" from the high ground.Allow me to explain: you DON'T KNOW the full story Peter.
"Quote Mining" was what Dawkins did in his "Outrage" silly post. Go read it.
It's no "mob rule" at all. Dawkins built a forum, and now recklessly destroyed it without even giving anyone's notice, in the most condescending way. Thus, I say, fuck him. I don't care if Josh was inapropriate because her mother died. I don't hang out with condescending and dictatorial types.I don't subscribe to mob rule, luis, I would prefer to wait until the full facts are known. at the moment they aren't.
What happened resumes as follows. A friend invited us to his place. And then suddenly states that it's his place and thus doesn't want our presence anymore, in the most condescending manner. I say, good for you, asshole. Next time, don't fucking invite me. And all the 85k people, enraged with the issue, just goes out to find another nice place to chat, while not giving a damn for that obnoxious, snobby "friend".
