First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Flora
Posts: 507
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:50 pm
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Flora » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:10 pm

pzmyers wrote:
Flora wrote:
pzmyers wrote:I'm a "celebrity" now? Heh. I'm a guy with a blog, with absolutely zero influence over Josh, and no obligations in return.

Although I am a little miffed. I've seen the traffic numbers on RD.net from Google Analytics, and it gets about 1/2 to 2/3 of the traffic of Pharyngula (and sorry to inform you of the diminution of your status further still, but the forums only got about 1/4 of the traffic of the whole site). And you guys keep talking about how RD.net is the biggest.
We've been tracking data on forums since last October and have the stats to show that the RD forum has become the busiest atheist forum on the Internet. Feel free to PM me for the evidence and I'll send it to you. We've also tracked comments and posts on the RD front page and forum. On average, the forum has had about 3,000 posts per week and the front page gets between 1/8 and 1/10 of that in comments. If you just look at the forum posts that focus on Dawkins, Reason and Science, these amount to an average of 2,000 per week.
I trust your numbers...but I get between 1000 and 2000 comments per day. Just sayin'.
As you can see from my edited post, I meant to say 3,000 per day not per week. My mistake - I'm knackered. Feel free PM me for the evidence because I have it all.
Last edited by Flora on Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Fastin
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:57 pm
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Fastin » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:11 pm

pzmyers wrote:We have never discussed this new forum in any way. I doubt that he's concerned at all about it -- he is not the internet monitor.
If he isn't concerned about it then why did he cite it in his public post about the issue? It seems the individuals here have shown proper citation that the quote mining that was done came from this site and not from RD.net.

http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 00#p355577

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by klr » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:12 pm

pzmyers wrote:
Flora wrote:
pzmyers wrote:I'm a "celebrity" now? Heh. I'm a guy with a blog, with absolutely zero influence over Josh, and no obligations in return.

Although I am a little miffed. I've seen the traffic numbers on RD.net from Google Analytics, and it gets about 1/2 to 2/3 of the traffic of Pharyngula (and sorry to inform you of the diminution of your status further still, but the forums only got about 1/4 of the traffic of the whole site). And you guys keep talking about how RD.net is the biggest.
We've been tracking data on forums since last October and have the stats to show that the RD forum has become the busiest atheist forum on the Internet. Feel free to PM me for the evidence and I'll send it to you. We've also tracked comments and posts on the RD front page and forum. On average, the forum has had about 3,000 posts per week and the front page gets between 1/8 and 1/10 of that in comments. If you just look at the forum posts that focus on Dawkins, Reason and Science, these amount to an average of 2,000 per week.
I trust your numbers...but I get between 1000 and 2000 comments per day. Just sayin'.
This site has averaged close to 1,000 posts a day over the past year, from a very much smaller (but generally more prolific) user base. The RD.net forum would have (maybe) an average of 300 registered users on-line at any one time. 2,000 posts a day is only around 80 posts an hour, average. It's not that hard. The overall post total of well over 2,000,000 posts (ignoring deletions) in less than 3 1/2 years also tallies with what Flora has said (EDIT: correcting for the week/day typo).
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
the pigeon
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:26 pm
Location: Tropical Connecticut
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by the pigeon » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:13 pm

pzmyers wrote:
Flora wrote:
pzmyers wrote:I'm a "celebrity" now? Heh. I'm a guy with a blog, with absolutely zero influence over Josh, and no obligations in return.

Although I am a little miffed. I've seen the traffic numbers on RD.net from Google Analytics, and it gets about 1/2 to 2/3 of the traffic of Pharyngula (and sorry to inform you of the diminution of your status further still, but the forums only got about 1/4 of the traffic of the whole site). And you guys keep talking about how RD.net is the biggest.
We've been tracking data on forums since last October and have the stats to show that the RD forum has become the busiest atheist forum on the Internet. Feel free to PM me for the evidence and I'll send it to you. We've also tracked comments and posts on the RD front page and forum. On average, the forum has had about 3,000 posts per week and the front page gets between 1/8 and 1/10 of that in comments. If you just look at the forum posts that focus on Dawkins, Reason and Science, these amount to an average of 2,000 per week.
I trust your numbers...but I get between 1000 and 2000 comments per day. Just sayin'.

Respectfully Dr. Myers, I'm not sure that this will prove to be a productive direction for any conversation. People have been treated poorly, and although I assume no damage will be permanent, this is hardly the time to, shall we say, measure ourselves.
Last edited by the pigeon on Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
eXcommunicate
Mr Handsome Sr.
Posts: 821
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:49 pm
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by eXcommunicate » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:14 pm

pzmyers wrote:
Flora wrote:
pzmyers wrote:I'm a "celebrity" now? Heh. I'm a guy with a blog, with absolutely zero influence over Josh, and no obligations in return.

Although I am a little miffed. I've seen the traffic numbers on RD.net from Google Analytics, and it gets about 1/2 to 2/3 of the traffic of Pharyngula (and sorry to inform you of the diminution of your status further still, but the forums only got about 1/4 of the traffic of the whole site). And you guys keep talking about how RD.net is the biggest.
We've been tracking data on forums since last October and have the stats to show that the RD forum has become the busiest atheist forum on the Internet. Feel free to PM me for the evidence and I'll send it to you. We've also tracked comments and posts on the RD front page and forum. On average, the forum has had about 3,000 posts per week and the front page gets between 1/8 and 1/10 of that in comments. If you just look at the forum posts that focus on Dawkins, Reason and Science, these amount to an average of 2,000 per week.
I trust your numbers...but I get between 1000 and 2000 comments per day. Just sayin'.
WTF? 2000 comments per day? What do you blokes talk about over there? Link me to your site. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. /Internet meme
Michael Hafer
You know, when I read that I wanted to muff-punch you with my typewriter.
One girl; two cocks. Ultimate showdown.

User avatar
leo-rcc
Robo-Warrior
Posts: 7848
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
About me: Combat robot builder
Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by leo-rcc » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:15 pm

Mazille wrote:
Mazille wrote:
Weaver wrote:RD has spoken ... supporting Josh all the way:

http://forum.richarddawkins.net/viewtop ... 7&t=110356
I felt that coming.
He is truly either senile and Josh leads him like a sheep, or he has no regard for other people. Either way, I know whose books I won't buy any longer. You have broken my trust in you and I shall not forgive you.


(Also, it looks like he actually read some posts here.)
If he is:

Fuck you Richard.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org

Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you

User avatar
cowiz
Shirley
Posts: 16482
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
About me: Head up a camels arse
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by cowiz » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:15 pm

eXcommunicate wrote:
pzmyers wrote:
Flora wrote:
pzmyers wrote:I'm a "celebrity" now? Heh. I'm a guy with a blog, with absolutely zero influence over Josh, and no obligations in return.

Although I am a little miffed. I've seen the traffic numbers on RD.net from Google Analytics, and it gets about 1/2 to 2/3 of the traffic of Pharyngula (and sorry to inform you of the diminution of your status further still, but the forums only got about 1/4 of the traffic of the whole site). And you guys keep talking about how RD.net is the biggest.
We've been tracking data on forums since last October and have the stats to show that the RD forum has become the busiest atheist forum on the Internet. Feel free to PM me for the evidence and I'll send it to you. We've also tracked comments and posts on the RD front page and forum. On average, the forum has had about 3,000 posts per week and the front page gets between 1/8 and 1/10 of that in comments. If you just look at the forum posts that focus on Dawkins, Reason and Science, these amount to an average of 2,000 per week.
I trust your numbers...but I get between 1000 and 2000 comments per day. Just sayin'.
WTF? 2000 comments per day? What do you blokes talk about over there? Link me to your site. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. /Internet meme
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.

User avatar
Heresiarch
Posts: 237
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:39 pm
About me: Formerly known as Heresiarch.
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Heresiarch » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:17 pm

pzmyers wrote:I trust your numbers...but I get between 1000 and 2000 comments per day. Just sayin'.
And your comment system blows chunks. If you ran a real forum, it would be massive. Mind you, it would probably be a massive pain for you too.
The Hell Law says that Hell is reserved exclusively for them that
believe in it. Further, the lowest Rung in Hell is reserved for them that
believe in it on the supposition that they'll go there if they don't.
-- Honest Book of Truth; The Gospel According to Fred, 3:1

User avatar
M
Arm wrestling champion
Posts: 3688
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:35 pm
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by M » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:21 pm

My site gets more hits than yours. :razzle:

Image
Bloody Greta Garbo

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Fallible » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:22 pm

EEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day.
- Yann Tiersen

Image

User avatar
Flora
Posts: 507
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:50 pm
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Flora » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:25 pm

The average RD forum posts since last October are about 3,000 per DAY - see my edited post. I made a posting mistake because I'm knackered but I have tons of data as evidence that an average of about 3,000 per day is correct and that it is higher than any other atheist forum on the Internet. Apologies for shouting in pink but it's busy in here!

User avatar
normal
!
!
Posts: 9071
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:23 pm
About me: meh
Location: North, and then some
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by normal » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:26 pm

I LIKE YOUR NIPPLE PIC, PZ!

Sorry for shouting. Just had to try flora's tactic :tup:
Image
Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable, let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   -Douglas Adams

User avatar
paceetrate
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:33 am
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by paceetrate » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:28 pm

I have to say I'm thoroughly disgusted by RD's response. He's not computer-illiterate, if he was interested in understanding the whole story, rather than just the bits picked out for him by his child-who-can-do-no-wrong, he'd have already read about it. What utter hypocrisy.

I was in the middle of listening to the audiobook of The Greatest Show On Earth. I'm not sure I can bring myself to finish it now. It's like when I found out that Jim Carrey was an anti-vax idiot. I used to love his movies, and now I can't watch any of them without thoughts of "You fucking bastard" going through my head.

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by klr » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:28 pm

Flora wrote:The average RD forum posts since last October are about 3,000 per DAY - see my edited post. I made a posting mistake because I'm knackered but I have tons of data as evidence that an average of about 3,000 per day is correct and that it is higher than any other atheist forum on the Internet. Apologies for shouting in pink but it's busy in here!
About 125 posts an hour then, or 2 per minute. As I said earlier, with hundreds of users on-line at any given time, these sorts of figures are easy to achieve.
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:30 pm

Normal wrote:I LIKE YOUR NIPPLE PIC, PZ!

Sorry for shouting. Just had to try flora's tactic :tup:
:coffeespray:

Needed that.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests