

DoctorE wrote:ReallyBella Fortuna wrote:Josh defriended me on Facebook... do you see me crying?![]()
I think Josh has serious mental problems, perhaps he is undercover christian
Gallstones has a Facebook page. She posted a non-link to it before everything went tits up but I do know Nora is a F’book friend of hers.ozewiezeloose wrote:I'd send Josh the exact same picture if I could still post PM's. Crap.SnowLeopard wrote:Gallstones was posting a picture of someone giving the middle finger, other mod's supported his views. Rest of us vented our displeasure at the situation. Nothing that wasn't to be expected after being told we were being fucked.
That was really mean that one. Why do they care if we advertise?Strontium Dog wrote: It's as if Dawkins and his henchmen think they own the people who posted on that forum, clearly evidenced by their instruction not to attempt to "'relocate' groups of users to a separate forum".
What, you didn't realise when you signed up there that you forfeited your rights as an individual, agreed to perpetual mental indentured servitude, and that your identity became sole property of RDF?ficklefiend wrote:That was really mean that one. Why do they care if we advertise?Strontium Dog wrote: It's as if Dawkins and his henchmen think they own the people who posted on that forum, clearly evidenced by their instruction not to attempt to "'relocate' groups of users to a separate forum".
You've just shut the forum! I might not see any of these people again! It matters.
Hack,hackenslash wrote:My archive is complete. I'm just going to check how much of it is intact.
Farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrk!The upload was rejected because the uploaded file was identified as a possible attack vector.
Not to mention the fact that going off on tangents is the way that creativity and imagination works. Thinking outside the square, seeing where those tangents lead, and forming logical connections between them and the original topic. How many discoveries were made because someone went off on a tangent and found that through it they were able to answer their original question (think of how Kekule's dream of a snake swallowing its tail gave him the idea for the structure of benzene, for a colourful example).ficklefiend wrote: Sticking on topic is actually very hard, it's not the way our brains work or the way normal human conversation goes. It stifles debate because it stops new people adding new information. On very strict "on-topic" forums I have been in it often seems like people run out of things to say, because they must stick to such a narrow way of exploring the issue.
natselrox wrote:
But the copyright of those posts technically belonged to RD.net and if Josh is not willing to co-operate...
And I can't send PMs! It says "You can't make a post so soon after your last!" :pissed:Witticism wrote:Hack,hackenslash wrote:My archive is complete. I'm just going to check how much of it is intact.
I just tried to change my avatar [with your http://www.rationalia.com jpg] over at (once was) RDF's and got this:
Farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrk!The upload was rejected because the uploaded file was identified as a possible attack vector.
Yep. Worked for me, like, 15 minutes ago.Fallible wrote:Oh boobies. Well those which have already been changed are still there.
next start changing the colours and resizing it slightly? lol.hackenslash wrote:It's probably flagged the detail, as quite a few of us are now using it. Try this one.
http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q301 ... alia-1.jpg
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest