Feck wrote: What's that ?

Feck wrote: What's that ?
The major problems would be the construction material, no gravity, and getting hit by a stray rock.AshtonBlack wrote:I would say Class II impossibility*. We would need the mass/energy of several stars for this to work.
*Class I is not with current tech but probably within the next century.
Class II is not with current tech but not against the laws of physics, as we understand them.
Class III is against the laws of physics, as we understand them.
Source: Michio Kaku: Physics of the impossible.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
We need advanced technology to even consider the thing, so I'll just go ahead and invent some more. First, a machine for converting one type of matter into another, bulk rate. Anything that goes in comes out as Dysonium. This material is ultimately rigid in one state, easily formed and molded in another, and those states are switched with very low energy cost. So we build the parts of the sphere out in the Oort Cloud and when we've cleaned up the solar system they're moved into position.DP wrote:The major problems would be the construction material, no gravity, and getting hit by a stray rock.AshtonBlack wrote:I would say Class II impossibility*. We would need the mass/energy of several stars for this to work.
*Class I is not with current tech but probably within the next century.
Class II is not with current tech but not against the laws of physics, as we understand them.
Class III is against the laws of physics, as we understand them.
Source: Michio Kaku: Physics of the impossible.
The other major problem is that given human tendencies towards pollution the inside of the sphere would have a similar atmosphere to Venus within 100 years.
Science fiction conventions hold that neutronium would be one of the few suitable materials for constructing a Dyson Sphere.Gawdzilla wrote:We need advanced technology to even consider the thing, so I'll just go ahead and invent some more. First, a machine for converting one type of matter into another, bulk rate. Anything that goes in comes out as Dysonium. This material is ultimately rigid in one state, easily formed and molded in another, and those states are switched with very low energy cost. So we build the parts of the sphere out in the Oort Cloud and when we've cleaned up the solar system they're moved into position.DP wrote:The major problems would be the construction material, no gravity, and getting hit by a stray rock.AshtonBlack wrote:I would say Class II impossibility*. We would need the mass/energy of several stars for this to work.
*Class I is not with current tech but probably within the next century.
Class II is not with current tech but not against the laws of physics, as we understand them.
Class III is against the laws of physics, as we understand them.
Source: Michio Kaku: Physics of the impossible.
The other major problem is that given human tendencies towards pollution the inside of the sphere would have a similar atmosphere to Venus within 100 years.
Then we use modified versions of the Dysonium generator to scrub the atmosphere.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
But Dysonium isn't made with in Chinese slave labor camps.DP wrote:Science fiction conventions hold that neutronium would be one of the few suitable materials for constructing a Dyson Sphere.
But then it could crash.Thinking Aloud wrote:It needs windows.Gawdzilla wrote:Actually, you harvest the Ort Cloud for material to make the Sphere. Don't want any loose change rattling around the system when you're done, now do you? Same with all the other planets.Thinking Aloud wrote:Comets will love that!Gawdzilla wrote:Inspired by the Rings of Earth thread.
Billions of times the living space of Earth, ALL the energy of the sun available for use. And just three meters from "outer space". What's not to love.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests