Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Give us a seminar, lecture or lesson on what your 'thing' is. Now with our exclusive ASK-A-NERD!!!
Post Reply
User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by FBM » Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:56 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I have been noticing a blue cast on your pictures for a long while, FBM. Since long before you took the camera to bits. There is always a look about them like a TV where the red gun's playing up - the red areas look magenta. I put it down to you converting the pics to other formats, or messing around with them in photoshop or something, so I never mentioned it before.
No shit? :think:

I gotta get to the bottom of this...
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:59 am

FBM wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I have been noticing a blue cast on your pictures for a long while, FBM. Since long before you took the camera to bits. There is always a look about them like a TV where the red gun's playing up - the red areas look magenta. I put it down to you converting the pics to other formats, or messing around with them in photoshop or something, so I never mentioned it before.
No shit? :think:

I gotta get to the bottom of this...
Or maybe Korea just looks like that. :dono:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by FBM » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:03 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
FBM wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I have been noticing a blue cast on your pictures for a long while, FBM. Since long before you took the camera to bits. There is always a look about them like a TV where the red gun's playing up - the red areas look magenta. I put it down to you converting the pics to other formats, or messing around with them in photoshop or something, so I never mentioned it before.
No shit? :think:

I gotta get to the bottom of this...
Or maybe Korea just looks like that. :dono:
:hilarious: :hilarious: Well, on the Korean flag, the yin-yang symbol is red and blue instead of black and white. The red is on top (N. Korea) and blue is on bottom... :eddy:

I just took a couple more test shots...hang on while I resize...And CJ, I'm checking on the White Balance...

Edit: Test...
Image
http://api.photoshop.com/home_dbb96af8e ... 41647f5368[/imgc]

Too bwoo!!!!! :nono:
Last edited by FBM on Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by Feck » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:08 am

Colour cast ? check the White balance settings on your camera ,If you are Pshopping your pictures and they look ok to you then maybe
your monitor needs adjusting ?
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by FBM » Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:13 am

Checked the White Balance. It was set for bright and sunny day conditions. That would have been set thusly before the monsoon season. :roll: Switched it to AUTO. I've got enough daylight left. Let's see what happens...

Edit:
Image
http://api.photoshop.com/home_dbb96af8e ... ff9db6e36d[/imgc]
Image
http://api.photoshop.com/home_dbb96af8e ... 7f1cfcf007[/imgc]

My oblations to the cast of this mini-drama, in order of appearance:

:praise: ====> (CJ)

:praise: ==== (XC)

:praise: ==== (mrenutt4)
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
JacksSmirkingRevenge
Grand Wazoo
Posts: 13512
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:56 pm
About me: Half man - half yak.
Location: Perfidious Albion
Contact:

Re: Photography

Post by JacksSmirkingRevenge » Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:22 am

CJ wrote:
Cwazy Cat Lady wrote:CJ, can you think of an entirely different crop that also 'works'? (for fun?)
I had a think about that and I cant really do any better than those already there.
How about a riding crop? :whisper: :naughty:



....I'll get me coat.
Sent from my Interositor using Twatatalk.

User avatar
SnowLeopard
Posts: 435
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by SnowLeopard » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:04 am

No a UV or skylight filter is compulsory to protect the front element of your expensive lens, not a waste of money at all.
Not compulsory.

I used to agree with you. Now I disagree and agree with the camp that I have insurance and why would you want to put a "cheap" bit of glass in front of my £1,100 lens, Kinda defeats the purpose of buying an expensive bit of lens. :dono:

I used to have UV filters on my 100-400 L and my 17-85. Long since gone to ebay.
In the begining there was nothing. Which then exploded.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by FBM » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:08 am

SnowLeopard wrote:
No a UV or skylight filter is compulsory to protect the front element of your expensive lens, not a waste of money at all.
Not compulsory.

I used to agree with you. Now I disagree and agree with the camp that I have insurance and why would you want to put a "cheap" bit of glass in front of my £1,100 lens, Kinda defeats the purpose of buying an expensive bit of lens. :dono:
I've read that opinion before and it's kinda hard to argue with. I'm going to do some testing (if it ever stops raining) with and without the UV filter and then zoom in and see if there's any difference at the pixel level.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

CJ
Posts: 8436
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by CJ » Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:14 pm

SnowLeopard wrote:
No a UV or skylight filter is compulsory to protect the front element of your expensive lens, not a waste of money at all.
Not compulsory.

I used to agree with you. Now I disagree and agree with the camp that I have insurance and why would you want to put a "cheap" bit of glass in front of my £1,100 lens, Kinda defeats the purpose of buying an expensive bit of lens. :dono:

I used to have UV filters on my 100-400 L and my 17-85. Long since gone to ebay.
Fair point. I might try some test shots.

User avatar
BrettA
Master Muff and Lube Guru
Posts: 1887
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:16 am

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by BrettA » Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:57 am

SnowLeopard wrote:
No a UV or skylight filter is compulsory to protect the front element of your expensive lens, not a waste of money at all.
Not compulsory. < Cut >
And sometimes not even available - neither my 300 f/2.8 nor my 14-24 f/2.8 can even take a filter at the front element.
"It's just a fact: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F!"

aznxscorpion517
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by aznxscorpion517 » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:52 am

BrettA wrote:
SnowLeopard wrote:
No a UV or skylight filter is compulsory to protect the front element of your expensive lens, not a waste of money at all.
Not compulsory. < Cut >
And sometimes not even available - neither my 300 f/2.8 nor my 14-24 f/2.8 can even take a filter at the front element.
Why is that? That seems weird. Keep in mind that there are various filter sizes out there depending on the filter thread diameter of each lens you own.

aznxscorpion517
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by aznxscorpion517 » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:54 am

This is great! A photography thread! I love photography. I have a lot of pictures, which I posted back at RD.net. Photography is not my profession but a very important hobby. I haven't had much opportunities for photos lately but I wouldn't mind answering questions either if help was needed.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by FBM » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:04 am

aznxscorpion517 wrote:This is great! A photography thread! I love photography. I have a lot of pictures, which I posted back at RD.net. Photography is not my profession but a very important hobby. I haven't had much opportunities for photos lately but I wouldn't mind answering questions either if help was needed.
Great! I've got one question that been burning in my mind for quite some time: Why do most of my pictures suck ass? :lay:


(I know the answer, really. It's because I don't really know wtf I'm doing. :mrgreen: )

Anyway, check out the Gallery and please contribute. :tup:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by Clinton Huxley » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:14 am

I've recently got a DSLR and am hoping to absorb wisdom from this thread....
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Photography - Technique and Equipment considerations

Post by FBM » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:22 am

Clinton Huxley wrote:I've recently got a DSLR and am hoping to absorb wisdom from this thread....
:hilarious:

Yeah, good luck with that. :tup:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest