Petraeus Condemns Church's Plan to Burn Quarans

[mistermack]

The fucking internet is already so jammed up it takes half an hour to load a fucking page

That's just the porn sites. ( so they tell me ). You should try widening your reading.

And yet you have the sheer hypocrisy to call Americans "brain-dead".

Some americans, I said. We have them too, but they find it harder to get guns here.

with your ineffective badgering and/or indoctrination attempts, as the case may be

Read my words, read my words, YOU WILL READ MY WORDS! You must believe my bloviations, YOU MUST BELIEVE MY BLOVIATIONS, you are in my power!
.

[Tigger]

Oh, I do like a brisk conversation.
And I had to look up bloviations in case it was an ad hom.

[Cunt]

Can you teach me how to bloviate, Tiger?

[Tigger]

Can you teach me how to bloviate, Tiger?

It's maybe something one is born with.

[Cunt]

Do you think a cleft palette would affect my ability?

[Tigger]

Do you think a cleft palette would affect my ability?

Have you got a cleft palette?

[Cunt]

Not that I know of, why do you ask?

[Tigger]

Not that I know of, why do you ask?

It's the information age, don'tcha know?

[Cunt]

"My imaginary friend's written works are 100% true, but your imaginary friend's written works actually come from my imaginary friend's enemy, and should be burned..."

"Death to the Infidel - the entire western world is to blame for this insult to our imaginary friend!"



What a bunch of twats religious people are...

Free speech is free speech is free speech. You can't be denied the right to exercise it just because your words or actions would incite someone else to violence in opposition to what you said or did.

It's one thing to ask people to voluntarily restrict their exercising of freedom of expression in the name of prudence, etc., but ultimately it just ignores the real problem and encourages people to be intolerant of the right to free expression.

So burn away I say. And throw a few Bibles onto the flames. There must be plenty of those in that neck of the woods.

So, the little church caved to pressure.

I find the caving in, the fact that they accepted that there would be a worldwide violent backlash to be dehumanizing to Muslims. It's a fucking church with 50 people in bumfuck USA. If someone cannot help but cause harm to someone else half a world away over it, then that someone has no personhood in my eyes. They are a mindless machine if they cannot do any better than that.

This forum used to have lively condemnation of religious shit-baggery. Now it is more likely that someone will fact-check a meme about Trump, before commenting harshly on the rioting over burning holy books.

[pErvinalia]

Start a thread and present a coherent argument and you will get discussion.

I find it ironic that the guy who can't compose paragraphs of more than one or two sentences, and endlessly posts inane memes, would complain about a lack of meaningful discussion.

[Brian Peacock]

...


This forum used to have lively condemnation of religious shit-baggery. Now it is more likely that someone will fact-check a meme about Trump, before commenting harshly on the rioting over burning holy books.

What religious shit-baggery do you think we should be talking about?

[Svartalf]

Doesn't matter, we'll still be talking shit

[Hermit]

This forum used to have lively condemnation of religious shit-baggery. Now it is more likely that someone will fact-check a meme about Trump, before commenting harshly on the rioting over burning holy books.

Ya gotta work with what ya got, Daggles. As long as you keep supplying the Trump memes I work with them. It is difficult to engage in discussions with someone who explicitly refuses to discuss stuff. As pErv mentioned, it is ironic that you should complain about the lack of them.

It's not as though we had no decent discussions in your absence, but since you resumed posting almost four weeks ago at a rate of 20 posts per day, your flood of memes, disjointed comments, sarcastic snark and outright refusal to engage in discussion resulted in a seachange that made actual discussion difficult. It is an unfortunate fact that trolling and nonsensical posts change the focus of attention in all forums. You're supplying them like a flood of biblical proportions.

[Joe]

This forum used to have lively condemnation of religious shit-baggery. Now it is more likely that someone will fact-check a meme about Trump, before commenting harshly on the rioting over burning holy books.

Ya gotta work with what ya got, Daggles. As long as you keep supplying the Trump memes I work with them. It is difficult to engage in discussions with someone who explicitly refuses to discuss stuff. As pErv mentioned, it is ironic that you should complain about the lack of them.

It's not as though we had no decent discussions in your absence, but since you resumed posting almost four weeks ago at a rate of 20 posts per day, your flood of memes, disjointed comments, sarcastic snark and outright refusal to engage in discussion resulted in a seachange that made actual discussion difficult. It is an unfortunate fact that trolling and nonsensical posts change the focus of attention in all forums. You're supplying them like a flood of biblical proportions.

Discussion is more varied and thoughtful here when you're gone Cunt. Nothing personal, but you don't really converse much, even though you post a lot.

[Cunt]

OK, so Tommy Robinson reported on religious riots in Sweden. If you want to, you can weigh in, and possibly show a different perspective on it, than he did.
https://t.me/TommyRobinsonNews/34781

Why aren’t we talking about the Islamist uprising in Sweden?

Freedom of speech must include the freedom to ridicule Islam.

Or you can just keep focused on me. It's flattering, in a weird way.