The Coronavirus Thread

[Sean Hayden]

Oh Goody, the South African-made one.

... comes with extra corruption!

All your cell are belong to us!

[Joe]

N95 masks can be bought again, mainly hardware stores, Walmart and Amazon

https://www.walmart.com/browse/industri ... 48_2204211

I ordered 20 of the one with two yellow rubberbands behind the head

Good to know. I've been wearing my KN95's when I go outside, because of the smoke.

[Cunt]

Glad to have only a few smoky days here.

More from that not-yet-peer-reviewed study fallout...

[Sean Hayden]

"corporate medical injection" -- -- nailed the intelligent thinker

[Cunt]

I think it's hilarious that people can't imagine why anyone would be 'vaccine hesitant', when this one isn't a vaccine, isn't yet approved (coming soon though I think) and has discussion around it censored...

By the companies who raised the most money in the last couple years.

It used to be bad to do 'war profiteering'. Is there an equivalent immoral act around pandemics...? No matter the reason for a lockdown, Amazon wins and small businesses lose. Maybe they should do a 'climate lockdown' next, to see if they can push their worth to quadrillions.

[Sean Hayden]

It's less funny than it is annoying. I mean, you don't have to be smart to imagine why someone would hesitate to take any vaccine.

This is a manufactured issue. Somebody is improving their situation at our expense, congratulations on helping them get there faster cunt!

[Cunt]

It's less funny than it is annoying. I mean, you don't have to be smart to imagine why someone would hesitate to take any vaccine.

This is a manufactured issue. Somebody is improving their situation at our expense, congratulations on helping them get there faster cunt!

This doesn't make sense to me...

There ARE plenty of good reasons (and bad) but some treat all of them the same. On both sides, I think.

As to improving their situation...do you mean Amazon? Or the folks 'profiting' off hesitancy?

[Sean Hayden]

I mean people profiting off the lie that others don't understand hesitancy. Aren't you tired of helping loud mouths improve their lot by misrepresenting the world to any who will listen?

[L'Emmerdeur]

Glad to have only a few smoky days here.

More from that not-yet-peer-reviewed study fallout...

Hmm, why would anybody doubt that a meme posted on Gab is a reliable source?

'Education Is Now a Bigger Factor Than Race in Desire for COVID-19 Vaccine'

[E]ducational level is a significant factor in people’s views about vaccine safety and efficacy. On average, U.S. adults with at least a bachelor’s degree view the vaccine as much safer and more effective than those with less education. For example, people with a bachelor’s degree believe there is a 23% chance that a vaccinated person will still get COVID-19, while those with less education believe there is a 34% chance. Similarly, people with a college degree believe there is about a 15% chance for a serious side effect from the vaccine, while those with less education believe the risk is more than double at 31%.

Those fucking fact-checkers again. They're horrible people, just horrible. Look away!!!

'No, a Study Didn’t Find That "the Most Highly-Educated Americans Are Also the Most Vaccine-Hesitant"'

[Cunt]

I mean people profiting off the lie that others don't understand hesitancy. Aren't you tired of helping loud mouths improve their lot by misrepresenting the world to any who will listen?

There IS a tendency to treat the vaccine issues politically, more than scientifically. I'm not here to help loud mouths, any more than the 'fact-checkers' who fact-check memes.

Well, at least the memes that trigger them.

I think one of the funniest 'fact-checks' was seeing how some folks here viewed the kerfuffle between Crowder and that lefty-loon (Sam Cedar?) Still no indication that anyone here knew what the planned subject of discussion was, but plenty of enthusiasm for their 'side'.

Fact-checks, amirite?

[Tero]

Why would I go to Crowder for vaccine info?

[L'Emmerdeur]

'I'm not here to help loud mouths ...'

<< proceeds to cheer-lead for a loudmouth >>

[Cunt]

Why would I go to Crowder for vaccine info?

You wouldn't. No-one would.

But some of the members here commented on the Sam Cedar BS, without knowing the subject that Crowder had agreed to discuss with the bait in Cedar's 'bait & switch' celebration.

[Hermit]

I think one of the funniest 'fact-checks' was seeing how some folks here viewed the kerfuffle between Crowder and that lefty-loon (Sam Cedar?) Still no indication that anyone here knew what the planned subject of discussion was, but plenty of enthusiasm for their 'side'.

Fact-checks, amirite?

You're wrong. My only comment regarding the Seder-Crowder train wreck basically amounted to this:

Love those Youtube pundit fights. I watched 40 minutes of this one, hoping for something interesting to emerge*. Nothing did. FFS, we already know everything there is to know about Crowder. Why give that waster of oxygen more air?

What next? An Alex Jones - TYT confrontation? Wait. We've had that five years ago.


*and for Emma Vigeland to stop playing second fiddle.

Nobody else at rationalia has found reason to do any fact checking. Maybe someone at dissentry did?

[Cunt]

Several commented. No-one expressed knowledge about their subject of discussion.

Just flying flags.