The Coronavirus Thread

[Seabass]

Not exactly, but you would know if you had listened to them, rather than trying to prove something about me...

Or you could listen to them, for such.

Good to know you also didn't listen to them, nor do you know even the most basic things about them.

I admit it must be very confusing to someone who hasn't listened to their presentations on the matter.


If you listen to it, let me know if you have thoughts on it. I already knew your thoughts on me.

I understand you don't want to listen to it, or review their discussion. It's funny how interested you are in everything BUT their news.

Shut the fuck up, you enormous Cunt. You won't even read a well-known short essay on fascism or a short article on black farmers in the US, but you whine incessantly when people won't watch your stupid right-wing vlog.

And when Hermit, glutton for punishment that he is, eventually watches it and either debunks it or explains how you misunderstood it, you'll just ignore him and pretend it never happened.

Shut the fuck up, fuck off, you fucking troll.

Since this is allowed here, I'll switch to dissenter to respond to you, as I think responding in kind could result in one of us being fairly banned.

[pErvinalia]

Not exactly, but you would know if you had listened to them, rather than trying to prove something about me...

Or you could listen to them, for such.

Good to know you also didn't listen to them, nor do you know even the most basic things about them.

I admit it must be very confusing to someone who hasn't listened to their presentations on the matter.


If you listen to it, let me know if you have thoughts on it. I already knew your thoughts on me.

I understand you don't want to listen to it, or review their discussion. It's funny how interested you are in everything BUT their news.

Shut the fuck up, you enormous Cunt. You won't even read a well-known short essay on fascism or a short article on black farmers in the US, but you whine incessantly when people won't watch your stupid right-wing vlog.

He won't even watch videos we post, so why would we listen to his biased podcast?

[Joe]

Not exactly, but you would know if you had listened to them, rather than trying to prove something about me...

Or you could listen to them, for such.

Good to know you also didn't listen to them, nor do you know even the most basic things about them.

I admit it must be very confusing to someone who hasn't listened to their presentations on the matter.


If you listen to it, let me know if you have thoughts on it. I already knew your thoughts on me.

I understand you don't want to listen to it, or review their discussion. It's funny how interested you are in everything BUT their news.

Shut the fuck up, you enormous Cunt. You won't even read a well-known short essay on fascism or a short article on black farmers in the US, but you whine incessantly when people won't watch your stupid right-wing vlog.

He won't even watch videos we post, so why would we listen to his biased podcast?

Well, since he can't be arsed to post a link to it, there's no reason at all.

[Cunt]

You guys are so cute.

If you can't find it, I understand. I also feel confident that I don't want to help folks who are quick to judge, while simultaneously not knowing what they are judging.

I'm satisfied that my opinions on their presentation is better-informed than those here, and it suggests to me that some very well-funded corporate interests like to prevent news about ivermectin, and treatments in general, from being published.

One can only speculate about whether it means pharmaceutical giants deserve a bit of skepticism...

[pErvinalia]

Sorry, can't do podcasts at the moment.

[Cunt]

Sorry, can't do podcasts at the moment.

And shouldn't! Why on earth take advantage of found time, to follow current events, science (like Lex Fridman) or entertainment?

[Sean Hayden]

--shit, perv's cricket devotees take up all his time.

[pErvinalia]

Sorry, can't do podcasts at the moment.

And shouldn't! Why on earth take advantage of found time, to follow current events, science (like Lex Fridman) or entertainment?

Sorry, can't answer questions at the moment.

[pErvinalia]

--shit, perv's cricket devotees take up all his time.

Less than two months till cricket starts again.

[Joe]

You guys are so cute.

If you can't find it, I understand. I also feel confident that I don't want to help folks who are quick to judge, while simultaneously not knowing what they are judging.

I'm satisfied that my opinions on their presentation is better-informed than those here, and it suggests to me that some very well-funded corporate interests like to prevent news about ivermectin, and treatments in general, from being published.

One can only speculate about whether it means pharmaceutical giants deserve a bit of skepticism...

Now Darren, don't be a Karen. It's not our fault you don't know what you're talking about.

[Sean Hayden]

The school district here can't require students who've tested positive to stay home to isolate.

That's bizarre to me. What do you make of it?

--//--

It's gotta be so unlikely to come up that this amounts to nothing really...

[pErvinalia]

The school district here can't require students who've tested positive to stay home to isolate.

That's bizarre to me. What do you make of it?

Freedum!

[Sean Hayden]

Yeah, but freedom lovers don't get tested, and if they did they ain't telling, so...

[JimC]

The school district here can't require students who've tested positive to stay home to isolate.

That's bizarre to me. What do you make of it?

--//--

It's gotta be so unlikely to come up that this amounts to nothing really...

None of that nonsense here in the People's Republic of Victoria. The government instructs, and we obey!

[L'Emmerdeur]

Simply put, there are reasonable reasons offered for having vaccine hesitancy. They discuss some of those reasons in the discussions you haven't listened to.

I understand [snipped]

It appears that you don't understand the argument being made by the people whose spiel you're promoting here. If you did you would be able to lay it out in your own words. You find it very convincing but you don't understand it.

So you're telling people to listen to the spiel that you don't understand, not because it is a sound argument backed up with solid evidence (you can't know whether it is or not unless you understand it), but because you find it convincing.

I'll note that if the research were solid it would have been written up, published after having passed peer review, and then confirmed by further research. This isn't a new story, as the previous papers on it demonstrate.

When people look to the actual science and find that the spiel looks on its face remarkably like a snake oil promotion (remember how you kept harping on about hydroxychloroquine? no?) you really have nothing to offer other than butthurt masked by sneering.