"Alt-right" Still Parading Ignorance, Stupidity, Malice, Etc.

[Joe]

I'm not having an argument. If seabass is, good for him.

If he (or you) wanted to have one with me, you would first seek out consent. Or risk a lack of participation.

You made an assertion Cunt. Nobody needs your consent to dispute it. I can't speak for other members, but I'll "risk a lack of participation" if need be.

[Cunt]

You can all be very convincing. Not here, but I'm sure you can be.

[Joe]

Nice lack of participation Cunt.

[Sean Hayden]

Oh look, the Cunt show's on again.

[Joe]

[Cunt]

Trying to sort out whether it is Malice who is 'alt right', or Poseibackack.

The book looks like another fair report on antifa, but antifa fans almost HAVE to focus on the character of either, to make any headway against them.

Dealing with their claims or facts would be a bit too awkward.

[Cunt]

More from the 'alt-right'
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/art ... -422X-2-69

Conclusion
Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.

[Seabass]

Trying to sort out whether it is Malice who is 'alt right', or Poseibackack.

The book looks like another fair report on antifa, but antifa fans almost HAVE to focus on the character of either, to make any headway against them.

Dealing with their claims or facts would be a bit too awkward.

Cunt is promoting fascists again.

https://www.splcenter.org/splc-investig ... t-movement

[Hermit]

More from the 'alt-right'
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/art ... -422X-2-69

Conclusion
Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.

Posts circulated on social media make the claim that the results of a 2005 chloroquine/SARS study provide evidence of hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness against COVID-19. This is false.
Reuters Fact Check. REUTERS/Axel Schmidt

Some posts on social media contain screenshots of a 2005 study originally published in the Virology Journal ( here ) and found among the National Institutes of Health’s archived studies ( here ). The original article is entitled “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread”.

Other posts are accompanied by screenshots of an April 2020 opinion column by Bryan Fischer on “The Northwest Connection” ( www.nw-connection.com/?p=6147 ). Fischer referenced the same Virology article and notably wrote: “So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine.” Examples of the claim are visible here and here .

The 2005 study in Virology specifically found that chloroquine had “strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells,” and that “favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection” meaning that the drug had both preventative and therapeutic benefits for the test subjects.

This study, however, was limited to animal testing in a laboratory setting (the study refers to primates in its abstract and methodology, there is no mention of human testing, pages 1 and 9 here ). The authors do suggest that their positive results in primate cell culture are promising (see page 9) and the use of chloroquine for the clinical management of SARS is presented as a possibility. They also mention that “infectivity of coronaviruses other than SARS-CoV are also affected by chloroquine, as exemplified by the human CoV-229E” (page 9), a possible source for the online claims.

The study’s focus was the then-newly discovered SARS-CoV coronavirus that causes Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, not the SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19. While the two are both coronaviruses, they are different strains causing different diseases.

The 2005 study could not have investigated chloroquine’s effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 because the latter was not identified until January 2020 following the December 2019 outbreak in Wuhan, China, of what we now know as COVID-19 ( here ).

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are two related, but different drugs with similar “clinical indications for use” and similar toxicity ( here ).

As of this fact check’s publication, evidence for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness against COVID-19 remains inconclusive.

As of June 16, 2020 the U.S. NIH recommends against the “use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, except in a clinical trial” and against “the use of high-dose chloroquine (600 mg twice daily for 10 days) for the treatment of COVID-19.” ( here )

On July 1, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also cautioned against the use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for COVID-19 “outside of the hospital setting or a clinical trial due to risk of heart rhythm problems.” ( here )

This warning did not discourage the use of these drugs for FDA-approved uses for other diseases like malaria, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis.

Another recent study published in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents found that unsupervised use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine as a preventive measure against COVID-19 can “expose the public to serious adverse drug effects” ( here ).

In June, the World Health Organization (WHO) discontinued experimental treatments involving the use of hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir after the initial results of an international trial called Solidarity showed that the drugs produced little or no reduction in the mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients ( here , here ).

One month earlier, EU governments moved to halt the use of anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 patients, Reuters reported. Medicines agencies in France and Italy said the drug should not be used for COVID-19 outside clinical trials. Belgium’s regulator said trials aiming to evaluate the drug should also take potential risks into consideration ( here ).

VERDICT

False. A 2005 chloroquine/SARS study does not prove hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness against COVID-19. Existing evidence on the drug’s effectiveness against COVID-19 remains inconclusive.

Link

[Cunt]

Trying to sort out whether it is Malice who is 'alt right', or Poseibackack.

The book looks like another fair report on antifa, but antifa fans almost HAVE to focus on the character of either, to make any headway against them.

Dealing with their claims or facts would be a bit too awkward.

Cunt is promoting fascists again.

https://www.splcenter.org/splc-investig ... t-movement

written like an antifa provocateur.

Now do Malice!!

[Seabass]

It's good to know that when Cunt's not spamming the forum with alt-right talking points and propaganda or promoting fascist book authors, he can also find the time to spread medical disinformation.

[Cunt]

I know it is nonsense, but I would really enjoy the reaction if it comes true.

[JimC]

I'm not having an argument. If seabass is, good for him.

If he (or you) wanted to have one with me, you would first seek out consent. Or risk a lack of participation.

Not surprising, since you have no rational counter-arguments...

[Brian Peacock]

Looking forward to Cunt's condemnation of the use of violence by the state against the press...

Des Moines Register reporter acquitted in BLM protest case seen as attack on press

IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) – An Iowa jury on Wednesday acquitted a journalist who was pepper-sprayed and arrested by police while covering a protest, in a case that critics have derided as an attack on press freedoms and an abuse of prosecutorial discretion.

After deliberating for less than two hours, the jury found Des Moines Register reporter Andrea Sahouri and her ex-boyfriend Spenser Robnett not guilty on misdemeanor charges of failure to disperse and interference with official acts.

The Des Moines verdict is an embarrassing outcome for the office of Polk County Attorney John Sarcone, which pursued the charges despite widespread condemnation from advocates for a free press and human rights...

https://www.foxnews.com/us/des-moines-r ... lm-protest

Photojournalist Arrested at BLM Protest Wins Lawsuit Against Police

An independent photojournalist that sued the D.C. Police following his arrest for filming a protest in 2020 has won a settlement.

During a racial justice protest in August 2020, Kian Kelley-Chung, a local Black journalist and documentarian, was arrested among 40 other people, DCist reports. The 23-year old journalist and his film partner, Andrew Jasiura, were covering police brutality protests in D.C. at the time and had made it clear that both are part of the press.

While he recorded an altercation between an MPD officer and a protester, who was pushed to the ground, the police surrounded the nearby protestors, using a crowd-control tactic known as kettling, and arrested over 40 people, with just one later prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney for D.C.

During the altercation, Kelley-Chung explained that he was a journalist but was still arrested and charged with felony rioting, which prompted the subsequent lawsuit the journalist filed against the department, acting police chief Robert Contee III, and the District for violations of the First and Fourth Amendment, as well as his rights as a journalist under the Personal Privacy Protection Act, and for loss of income as a freelance journalist.

He spent a night in a holding cell with another maskless person present and his equipment was seized for 10 weeks as a result of the ordeal. Meanwhile, Kelley-Chung’s colleague Jasiura, who is White, wasn’t detained, which brought an argument of racial bias to the foreground of the situation...

https://petapixel.com/2021/05/06/photoj ... st-police/

[Cunt]

Riots are tough to cover. Good for them getting acquitted.

I do wish they would catch some of the rioters though. With all that footage of burning, trespassing and looting, you would think it would be as easy as catching a trespassing Qshaman.