Media Bias

[Brian Peacock]

Have you checked the veracity of your source? I think you should double check.

No, I'm checking the veracity of you.

Your dodging of the awkward questions reveals your shallow understanding. Your BBC is probably right about you.

Nope. Not dodging at all. You need to remember that someone repeating an unsubstantiated claim is not proof of that claim. Court records are publicly available/accessible so which court records are we talking about? Dates, times, trial, sentencing, probation conditions, etc etc? Remember, I'm not asking the Daily Caller or whatever to justify what you've said but you - I'm giving you the opportunity to fact check and back up your own claim. I'm pretty sure most people can fact check the claim that Rittenhouse walked into a BLM protest with a loaded rifle and shot, killed and injured only convicted criminals. What would it say about your sources, and your own eager trolling, if it turned out not to be the case? This alone would motivate most people to try and substantiate their claims and assertions, iff they were concerned with truth and factual accuracy that is.

[pErvinalia]

Your government and the BBC has told me about how racist certain people are. Maybe it's time to stop dismissing their accusations.

I certainly can see your predelictions here. Taking the side of the gibbering racist rioter instead of the victim.

https://thenewamerican.com/court-record ... ld-rapist/

Court records reveal that Joseph Don Rosenbaum (shown), the convicted sex offender whom Kyle Rittenhouse shot to death on August 25 in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was a pervert who molested five small kids, two of whom were brothers.

Initial reports about Rosenbaum, 36, based on his sex-offender registration in Wisconsin, said only that he had “sex with a minor.”

But yesterday, a fuller portrait of the deceased sociopath emerged. He was a child rapist who committed unspeakable crimes.

If you can't tell me why Rosenbaum was pissed off, and chasing Rittenhouse, I can dismiss you as ignorant, or willingly lying.

Your turn, handsome!

What does him being a pedophile have to do with anything? It's almost like you are suggesting he was deserving of being shot and killed.

[Cunt]

Your government and the BBC has told me about how racist certain people are. Maybe it's time to stop dismissing their accusations.

I certainly can see your predelictions here. Taking the side of the gibbering racist rioter instead of the victim.

https://thenewamerican.com/court-record ... ld-rapist/

Court records reveal that Joseph Don Rosenbaum (shown), the convicted sex offender whom Kyle Rittenhouse shot to death on August 25 in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was a pervert who molested five small kids, two of whom were brothers.

Initial reports about Rosenbaum, 36, based on his sex-offender registration in Wisconsin, said only that he had “sex with a minor.”

But yesterday, a fuller portrait of the deceased sociopath emerged. He was a child rapist who committed unspeakable crimes.

If you can't tell me why Rosenbaum was pissed off, and chasing Rittenhouse, I can dismiss you as ignorant, or willingly lying.

Your turn, handsome!

What does him being a pedophile have to do with anything? It's almost like you are suggesting he was deserving of being shot and killed.

So you ignore my question. Not surprising.

You are ignorant as to why Rosenbaum et al were chasing and attacking him. Keep ignoranting though. It helps me understand you.

Ditto for BP. I don't care what you say about the event. You have only shown you saw one side.

Almost like you are not permitted to admit why those rioters were chasing Rittenhouse. Or what weapon they attacked him with. Or at what point he should be allowed to defend himself.

Like little kids, who dug a hole and cry because they can't take it indoors when it's bedtime.

[pErvinalia]

Your government and the BBC has told me about how racist certain people are. Maybe it's time to stop dismissing their accusations.

I certainly can see your predelictions here. Taking the side of the gibbering racist rioter instead of the victim.

https://thenewamerican.com/court-record ... ld-rapist/

Court records reveal that Joseph Don Rosenbaum (shown), the convicted sex offender whom Kyle Rittenhouse shot to death on August 25 in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was a pervert who molested five small kids, two of whom were brothers.

Initial reports about Rosenbaum, 36, based on his sex-offender registration in Wisconsin, said only that he had “sex with a minor.”

But yesterday, a fuller portrait of the deceased sociopath emerged. He was a child rapist who committed unspeakable crimes.

If you can't tell me why Rosenbaum was pissed off, and chasing Rittenhouse, I can dismiss you as ignorant, or willingly lying.

Your turn, handsome!

What does him being a pedophile have to do with anything? It's almost like you are suggesting he was deserving of being shot and killed.

So you ignore my question. Not surprising.

You didn't ask me a question. But you did ignore mine. Not surprising.

You are ignorant as to why Rosenbaum et al were chasing and attacking him. Keep ignoranting though. It helps me understand you.

Ditto for BP. I don't care what you say about the event. You have only shown you saw one side.

Almost like you are not permitted to admit why those rioters were chasing Rittenhouse. Or what weapon they attacked him with. Or at what point he should be allowed to defend himself.

Like little kids, who dug a hole and cry because they can't take it indoors when it's bedtime.

Why did you quote me when your reply has nothing to do with what you quoted?

[Cunt]

If you can't tell me why Rosenbaum was pissed off, and chasing Rittenhouse, I can dismiss you as ignorant, or willingly lying.

Your turn, handsome!

You didn't ask me a question. But you did ignore mine. Not surprising.

[L'Emmerdeur]

That fucking mainstream press--always taking the side of the left/evil and oppressing people with their horrible leftist cancel culture.

'AP Firing Shows Right-Wing Hypocrisy, Illusion of "Objectivity"'

Emily Wilder had thought she’d hit it big. After interning at the Arizona Republic, she earned a newsroom assistant job at the Phoenix bureau of the Associated Press, starting May 3. It wouldn’t last long.

Several right-wing organizations, including the Federalist (5/19/21) and Washington Free Beacon (5/18/21) outlets, attacked the news service over Wilder’s previous affiliation with Students for Justice in Palestine, when she was an undergraduate at Stanford University. AP, which recently had its office in Gaza destroyed by Israeli missile fire, bowed to the pressure ...

The company told the [News Media] Guild that Wilder had violated the Social Media Policy that was negotiated with the union and by which all employees are required to comply. AP noted that the policy was specifically brought to her attention after her hiring, but did not specify which comments caused her termination. The Guild asked if the comments that caused her termination were posted before or after her hiring, and awaits a response.

This is a thin excuse from AP. Wilder told SFGate (5/20/21) that some of her past social media posts had been highlighted in a thread from the Stanford College Republicans, such as one calling Sheldon Adelson a “far-right, pro-Trump, naked mole rat–looking billionaire.” SFGate reported that “Wilder…said she would not have used such language today,” and that “not long after the thread started to gain steam on Twitter,” an AP editor told Wilder that “she would not get in trouble for her past activism and social media activity.” Wilder described her “firing as selective enforcement against those who have expressed criticisms of Israel.”

Wilder told FAIR in a phone interview that “to anyone with eyes and ears and brain,” the fact that her firing came after right-wing trolling “is no coincidence,” and that “it feels like it was a convenient opportunity to make me a scapegoat.” Wilder said that AP brass haven’t told her which of her posts were the reason for her firing, or what line she crossed. She noted that her views on Israel/Palestine were irrelevant to her work, which was entirely local.

[pErvinalia]

If you can't tell me why Rosenbaum was pissed off, and chasing Rittenhouse, I can dismiss you as ignorant, or willingly lying.

Your turn, handsome!

You didn't ask me a question. But you did ignore mine. Not surprising.

Still ignoring the question? You must be proud of your approach to adult discussion.

[Brian Peacock]

Your government and the BBC has told me about how racist certain people are. Maybe it's time to stop dismissing their accusations.

I certainly can see your predelictions here. Taking the side of the gibbering racist rioter instead of the victim.

https://thenewamerican.com/court-record ... ld-rapist/

Court records reveal that Joseph Don Rosenbaum (shown), the convicted sex offender whom Kyle Rittenhouse shot to death on August 25 in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was a pervert who molested five small kids, two of whom were brothers.

Initial reports about Rosenbaum, 36, based on his sex-offender registration in Wisconsin, said only that he had “sex with a minor.”

But yesterday, a fuller portrait of the deceased sociopath emerged. He was a child rapist who committed unspeakable crimes.

If you can't tell me why Rosenbaum was pissed off, and chasing Rittenhouse, I can dismiss you as ignorant, or willingly lying.

Your turn, handsome!

What does him being a pedophile have to do with anything? It's almost like you are suggesting he was deserving of being shot and killed.

Indeed. Not only was he at a BLM - as if that wasn't bad enough already! - but he somehow deserved, or Rittenhouse should be applauded, because he was a kiddy fiddler. But was he?

[Brian Peacock]

Your government and the BBC has told me about how racist certain people are. Maybe it's time to stop dismissing their accusations.

I certainly can see your predelictions here. Taking the side of the gibbering racist rioter instead of the victim.

https://thenewamerican.com/court-record ... ld-rapist/

Court records reveal that Joseph Don Rosenbaum (shown), the convicted sex offender whom Kyle Rittenhouse shot to death on August 25 in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was a pervert who molested five small kids, two of whom were brothers.

Initial reports about Rosenbaum, 36, based on his sex-offender registration in Wisconsin, said only that he had “sex with a minor.”

But yesterday, a fuller portrait of the deceased sociopath emerged. He was a child rapist who committed unspeakable crimes.

If you can't tell me why Rosenbaum was pissed off, and chasing Rittenhouse, I can dismiss you as ignorant, or willingly lying.

Your turn, handsome!

What does him being a pedophile have to do with anything? It's almost like you are suggesting he was deserving of being shot and killed.

So you ignore my question. Not surprising.

You are ignorant as to why Rosenbaum et al were chasing and attacking him. Keep ignoranting though. It helps me understand you.

Ditto for BP. I don't care what you say about the event. You have only shown you saw one side.

Almost like you are not permitted to admit why those rioters were chasing Rittenhouse. Or what weapon they attacked him with. Or at what point he should be allowed to defend himself.

Like little kids, who dug a hole and cry because they can't take it indoors when it's bedtime.

You brought up the claim about Rittenhouse only killing a pedo. That's your business. Can you back it up now please. Also, can you explain this other thing you've brought to the discussion: why a 17yo boy travelled to a protest with a long rifle and then walked into a crowd of demonstrators he fundamentally disagreed with and objected to, and why he might not be welcomed by the crowd, why he might be jeered by a crowd, or why he might be chased off by the crowd after discharging his weapon? These are also things you've brought up and need to justify to show us that you've seen more than one side of the story.

And yet, now you're implying that Rittenhouse knew his victims, knew one of them was a pedo, and sought them out as targets for summary justice. So as I asked in the first post responding to your claim...

Do you think people should be applauded for taking the law into their own hands and doing society a favour by permanently removing undesirables and wrong doers like this - or is it that people just don't have much of a reason to complain (if any) when something like this happens?

[Cunt]

No, no implication except the one that you don't know what happened. You don't have to, to maintain your (BBC approved) position.

Rosenbaum is the hero you deserve. I posted an article about him, and what he was shouting (protest slogan, you would probably call it)

I know you can't say. I even know why. It's fucking hilarious by now.

Here is one of the people he shot. You know, the one you are saying was a 'demonstrator'.

What's that in the hand of the arm Mr. R. shot? Can you see it? It looks familiar, but probably isn't a phone or a placard...

[BarnettNewman]

That’s not Rosenbaum. That’s someone with a gun who went after Rittenhouse with a handgun after Rittenhouse shot someone in cold blood.

I thought that’s the way it works in the US. When there’s a baddie with a gun, the 2A allows you to take care of the situation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Cunt]

No, it isn't Rosenbaum. It's someone later in the attack on Rittenhouse. The attack where Rittenhouse pissed off the mostly peaceful Rosenbaum allies.

Was that a legally held firearm? I know there was some careful phrasing indicating problems with the way Rittenhouse was armed.

[BarnettNewman]

Someone shot in cold blood in front of me. Yeah, I’d be a little more than pissed.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[BarnettNewman]

Was that a legally held firearm? I know there was some careful phrasing indicating problems with the way Rittenhouse was armed.

Why do you keep JAQing off? You brought the shooter into the conversation. Do the fucking research.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Cunt]

Who was it, with that handgun? Was it legal for him to be carrying it around a protest?

Or is it only important to be critical of one party?