Media Bias

[L'Emmerdeur]

“forcing our kids to be confused about their gender first thing in the morning.”

--excellent. With a few tweaks it would read like Lewis's demons.

It's a very similar mindset, now that you mention it. The insidious mainstream media is constantly manipulating the citizenry to be OK with horrible things like accepting gay people and rejecting racist bigotry.

[Cunt]

“forcing our kids to be confused about their gender first thing in the morning.”

--excellent. With a few tweaks it would read like Lewis's demons.

It's a very similar mindset, now that you mention it. The insidious mainstream media is constantly manipulating the citizenry to be OK with horrible things like accepting gay people and rejecting racist bigotry.

The Ayatolla is still on twitter, isn't he?

Yeah, those big-tech companies are rejecting just enough racism to block Trump, but not quite enough to block the Ayatolla.

Classy as fuck, and obviously the thought-leaders some people need.

[Cunt]

Media loves antifa, but some outlets do try to report more honestly on them.
https://www.lotuseaters.com/the-entire- ... a-violence

The Incomplete List of Violence Tied to Antifa

This is a list of combined instances of either Antifa groups, or individuals who identify as Antifa carrying out acts of violence against their perceived political opponents.

The list includes direct acts of terrorism, support for terrorism, preparing to commit acts of terrorism, assault, battery and attacks on election hustings.

[Cunt]

Did your favourite 'unbiased media sources' cover the gunshots during a live report from the Floyd memorial?

Crowder covered it, but I didn't see it elsewhere...

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/st/podcast (title: SUBVERSION: Biden Admin Bows to China AGAIN!)

It's about 8-10 minutes in.

31 shots, which were probably mostly peaceful.

[Brian Peacock]

Did Crowder cover the Kyle Rittenhouse story? I'd be interested to see how he made that into a hilarious 5 mins.

[Cunt]

Rittenhouse? Is that the young chap who was set upon by a convicted pedophile named Rosenbaum?

How did that go for the pedophile?

He did cover it, don't remember exactly what jokes he made, though I think something about firing a gun into a crowd of antifa, and hitting all convicted criminals.

[pErvinalia]

“forcing our kids to be confused about their gender first thing in the morning.”

--excellent. With a few tweaks it would read like Lewis's demons.

It's a very similar mindset, now that you mention it. The insidious mainstream media is constantly manipulating the citizenry to be OK with horrible things like accepting gay people and rejecting racist bigotry.

The Ayatolla is still on twitter, isn't he?

Yeah, those big-tech companies are rejecting just enough racism to block Trump, but not quite enough to block the Ayatolla.

Classy as fuck, and obviously the thought-leaders some people need.

What's the Ayatolla said on twitter that deserves banning?

[Cunt]

Something like 'peacefully and patriotically'. I'm sure he would never say anything as bothersome to you as Trump's tweets.

I hear some of the other microbloggers are upset with him though.

“Why Is Twitter Letting Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei Incite Rocket Attacks on Israeli Civilians?” @RFederle asked.

[Hermit]

The Ayatolla is still on twitter, isn't he?

Fair suck of the sav, cobber. Give Twitter some leeway. They did take years before eventually giving Trump the pink slip.

Once Ayatollah Khamenei becomes an obstacle for Twitter's profitability, his account will undoubtedly get the chop too.

[pErvinalia]

Something like 'peacefully and patriotically'. I'm sure he would never say anything as bothersome to you as Trump's tweets.

So you don't know? As I suspected.

[Brian Peacock]

Rittenhouse? Is that the young chap who was set upon by a convicted pedophile named Rosenbaum?

How did that go for the pedophile?

...

That's quite a claim Chuckles. Quite a claim indeed. Can you back it up though? I doubt that you can. I doubt that you're even interested in backing it up or whether it's actually true or not. Am I right? What's probably more important is that it's a story which the far-Right find comforting, because it casts Rittenhouse as a brave hero who took the law into his own hand to do society a favour - even if his actions amounted to an extrajudicial killing, or as that is sometimes referred to, a lynching.

Do you think people should be applauded for taking the law into their own hands and doing society a favour by permanently removing undesirables and wrong doers like this - or is it that people just don't have much of a reason to complain (if any) when something like this happens?

Asking for a friend.

[Hermit]

What's the Ayatolla said on twitter that deserves banning?

Palestinians are awake and determined. They must continue this path. One can only talk with the language of power with these criminals. They must increase their strength, stand strong, confront the enemy, and force them to stop their crimes. #FreePalestine

https://twitter.com/khamenei_ir/status/ ... wsrc%5Etfw

Considering the successes the Palestinians had with non-violence in the past, Khamenei's tweet is indeed an unacceptable provocation.

[Cunt]

Rittenhouse? Is that the young chap who was set upon by a convicted pedophile named Rosenbaum?

How did that go for the pedophile?

...

That's quite a claim Chuckles. Quite a claim indeed. Can you back it up though?

I didn't make much of a claim there. Reports are that Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile, set upon him.

Well, videos, rather than reports. He is the little bald chap here saying 'shoot me' with a racial epithet.
https://nypost.com/2020/08/28/kenosha-s ... armed-men/

I doubt that you can. I doubt that you're even interested in backing it up or whether it's actually true or not. Am I right?

Looking up whether he confronted the kid earlier? I can just look at the video.

What is it you think happened?

What's probably more important is that it's a story which the far-Right find comforting, because it casts Rittenhouse as a brave hero who took the law into his own hand to do society a favour - even if his actions amounted to an extrajudicial killing, or as that is sometimes referred to, a lynching.

Was Rosenbaum and his gang trying to lynch Mr. R?

See, if you don't think people should be allowed to defend themselves, it's easy to treat this as 'extrajudicial killing' or some such bullshit.

If you accept that he was being attacked, and defended himself, it gets a lot tougher to take the side of the racist pedophile you saw shouting in the video there.

Do you think people should be applauded for taking the law into their own hands and doing society a favour by permanently removing undesirables and wrong doers like this - or is it that people just don't have much of a reason to complain (if any) when something like this happens?

Asking for a friend.

If someone attacks you, or youer loved ones, should you be allowed to defend yourself? Or should you just take a knee.

Asking for a friend.

I understand that you take the side that CNN tells you to take, but don't have any reason to think you know anything other than their narrative.

[Joe]

Chuckles?

[Cunt]

Chuckles?

He must think it sounds cute.

What IS cute is that he is not aware of the story, or simply can't tell certain parts of it.

THAT is a pretty big chuckle.