AmeriKKKa

[Seabass]

That's because you're a blithering idiot.

Answer the question, you massive cunt.

Why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

[Cunt]

That's because you're a blithering idiot.

Answer the question, you massive cunt.

Why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

lol
You are cute when you are writing stupid shit.

[Seabass]

That's because you're a blithering idiot.

Answer the question, you massive cunt.

Why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

lol
You are cute when you are writing stupid shit.

Why don't you just answer the question?

[Cunt]

That's because you're a blithering idiot.

Answer the question, you massive cunt.

Why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

lol
You are cute when you are writing stupid shit.

Why don't you just answer the question?

Aw, kitten, it's because I don't respect you at all.

Look at how you are writing. How much should I respect you?

Ooohh - I know - DEMAND respect, and insist on it with insults and shitty innuendo.

Then you'll get your answer.

Unless you are not as smart as you think...

[Seabass]

Why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

lol
You are cute when you are writing stupid shit.

Why don't you just answer the question?

Aw, kitten, it's because I don't respect you at all.

Look at how you are writing. How much should I respect you?

Ooohh - I know - DEMAND respect, and insist on it with insults and shitty innuendo.

Then you'll get your answer.

Unless you are not as smart as you think...

You can't answer the question because you would have to acknowledge that the attacks you use against BLM are identical to the attacks that racists used against the black civil rights movement. ALL civil rights movements, ALL civil unrest is accompanied by property damage. This is a fact. Property damage is not unique to BLM.

Conservatives like yourself ALWAYS side with the bullies and oppressors over the downtrodden and marginalized. There is always a fucking excuse with you right-wing cunts for why black people should just sit the fuck down and shut up and accept the racism. Just take it, darkies, after all, short people and tall people are treated differently, so what are you gonna do?

[Cunt]

I knew you were going here already, no matter what I said.

Keep describing people as weaker or stronger based on race. It sounds like it is rewarding to you. Like you have moral indignation, and are spraying it around from atop your mount.

You wear it well. I bet the chicks really dig it. You probably get SO laid.

[Seabass]

Keep describing people as weaker or stronger based on race.

I have never done that in my life, dummkopf. It is obvious to anyone with a properly functioning human brain, however, that minorities are at a numerical disadvantage, so if the majority are a bunch of bigots they can make life difficult for minorities.

Do you drink a lot of lead, Cunt?

[Cunt]

Keep describing people as weaker or stronger based on race.

I have never done that in my life, dummkopf. It is obvious to anyone with a properly functioning human brain, however, that minorities are at a numerical disadvantage, so if the majority are a bunch of bigots they can make life difficult for minorities.

Do you drink a lot of lead, Cunt?

Are the majority a bunch of bigots?

It does seem that way when 'the establishment' gets caught being Epstein, Weinstein, Dolezar, and fucking Ellen.

[Seabass]

Keep describing people as weaker or stronger based on race.

I have never done that in my life, dummkopf. It is obvious to anyone with a properly functioning human brain, however, that minorities are at a numerical disadvantage, so if the majority are a bunch of bigots they can make life difficult for minorities.

Do you drink a lot of lead, Cunt?

Are the majority a bunch of bigots?

The US is incredibly racist, Twat.

It does seem that way when 'the establishment' gets caught being Epstein, Weinstein, Dolezar, and fucking Ellen.

But back to my question which you still haven't answered:

Why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

[Brian Peacock]

That's because you're a blithering idiot.

Answer the question, you massive cunt.

Why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

I think it's time to reel it in a bit.

[Brian Peacock]

That's because you're a blithering idiot.

Answer the question, you massive cunt.

Why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

lol
You are cute when you are writing stupid shit.

Malicious trolling. Time to pull back I think.

[L'Emmerdeur]

A comprehensive report laying out a the beginnings of a framework for effective opposition to the racist thugs and their fellow travellers:

'A National Policy Blueprint To End White Supremacist Violence'

White supremacist violence is not new, but in recent years, it has become a primary national security threat in the United States. Notions of racial superiority, hostility toward immigrants and minorities, and the myth of an embattled white majority defending its power have increasingly infiltrated mainstream American political and cultural discourse. In October 2020, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published its annual threat assessment, identifying racially and ethnically motivated violent extremists, particularly white supremacist extremists, as “the most persistent and lethal threat in the Homeland.”

...

Today’s white supremacist movement is rooted in the “white genocide” conspiracy theory, which warns that the “white race” is endangered by a changing demographic landscape caused by immigration and interracial relationships. The movement includes white nationalists, neo-Nazis, Christian Identity adherents, the alt-right, and those who espouse anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, and anti-Semitic beliefs. White supremacist ideologies and misogyny are closely connected, as white supremacy is primarily concerned with maintaining the elevated status of white men. Not all misogynists are racists, nor vice versa, and women are part of the white supremacist movement; but efforts toward both gender and racial equality can produce similarly perceived threats to that status. White supremacist narratives have incorporated the anti-Semitic “Zionist Occupation Government” conspiracy about Jewish control of the U.S. government, as well as “accelerationism,” which encourages disorder to spark a coming race war. There is also overlap with the QAnon conspiracy, which is built on long-standing anti-Semitic tropes, and with self-organized militias, some of which hold anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim views. The election in 2020 of two congressional representatives who have supported QAnon demonstrates the degree to which once-fringe ideas have permeated the mainstream.

Although racist tropes and metaphors have long been employed by politicians, white supremacist narratives and champions more prominently returned to mainstream discourse during the presidential campaign and administration of Donald Trump. On the campaign trail, Trump disparaged Mexican immigrants as “drug dealers, criminals, [and] rapists,” encouraged violence against those who opposed him, and employed Steve Bannon, a publisher of the alt-right. Researchers found the 2016 election was associated with a surge in reported hate crimes across the country, with counties that voted for Trump seeing the most significant increases by the largest margins. While in office, the Trump administration pursued racist policies, such as the Muslim ban, and his administration gave a platform to people who espoused white nationalist beliefs, such as former White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller. Moreover, Trump failed to unequivocally condemn white supremacists, and as white supremacist attacks grew in number and lethality, his administration reportedly advocated against allocating more resources to the threat.

[Brian Peacock]

...
Today’s white supremacist movement is rooted in the “white genocide” conspiracy theory, which warns that the “white race” is endangered by a changing demographic landscape caused by immigration and interracial relationships.15 The movement includes white nationalists, neo-Nazis, Christian Identity adherents, the alt-right, and those who espouse anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, and anti-Semitic beliefs. White supremacist ideologies and misogyny are closely connected, as white supremacy is primarily concerned with maintaining the elevated status of white men. Not all misogynists are racists, nor vice versa, and women are part of the white supremacist movement; but efforts toward both gender and racial equality can produce similarly perceived threats to that status. White supremacist narratives have incorporated the anti-Semitic “Zionist Occupation Government” conspiracy about Jewish control of the U.S. government, as well as “accelerationism,” which encourages disorder to spark a coming race war. There is also overlap with the QAnon conspiracy, which is built on long-standing anti-Semitic tropes, and with self-organized militias, some of which hold anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim views. The election in 2020 of two congressional representatives who have supported QAnon demonstrates the degree to which once-fringe ideas have permeated the mainstream.

Although racist tropes and metaphors have long been employed by politicians, white supremacist narratives and champions more prominently returned to mainstream discourse during the presidential campaign and administration of Donald Trump. On the campaign trail, Trump disparaged Mexican immigrants as “drug dealers, criminals, [and] rapists,” encouraged violence against those who opposed him, and employed Steve Bannon, a publisher of the alt-right. Researchers found the 2016 election was associated with a surge in reported hate crimes across the country, with counties that voted for Trump seeing the most significant increases by the largest margins. While in office, the Trump administration pursued racist policies, such as the Muslim ban, and his administration gave a platform to people who espoused white nationalist beliefs, such as former White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller. Moreover, Trump failed to unequivocally condemn white supremacists, and as white supremacist attacks grew in number and lethality, his administration reportedly advocated against allocating more resources to the threat.

In October 2020, DHS identified domestic violent extremism as a priority threat, noting that white supremacist extremists have become “exceptionally lethal” in their attacks. Today, white supremacists are the source of a majority of lethal attacks committed by extremists. ...

[pErvinalia]

Hey Cunt, why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

[Cunt]

That's because you're a blithering idiot.

Answer the question, you massive cunt.

Why was the property damage associated with the black civil rights movement of the '60s acceptable if the property damage happening along side BLM is unacceptable?

lol
You are cute when you are writing stupid shit.

Malicious trolling. Time to pull back I think.

Yeah, it gets tempting when he insults me again and again.

I'll try to treat him like a drunken kid when he gets like that. Sorry BP