Scientific Proof Of God
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
He is fucking himself so it must be the royal we.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Him and Ray "Banana Man" Comfort. He, among other fundies, features in superuniverse's new web page he linked to above. Impressive pigeons, all. It's "Checkmate, Athiests!!11!!!!1!" all the way down.
Impressive pigeons.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Hermit,
Even though your days are numbered, there is the possibility of change. I'm not going to make annihilation inevitable for people who are wrong due to ignorance. Rather this type of Fate is reserved for the worst of the worst: Randi, Dawkins, Shermer, Dillahunty, PZ, etc. Hermit, you have no effect and consequence on others.
Even though your days are numbered, there is the possibility of change. I'm not going to make annihilation inevitable for people who are wrong due to ignorance. Rather this type of Fate is reserved for the worst of the worst: Randi, Dawkins, Shermer, Dillahunty, PZ, etc. Hermit, you have no effect and consequence on others.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Thank you, your Holiness.superuniverse wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 12:04 amHermit,
Even though your days are numbered, there is the possibility of change. I'm not going to make annihilation inevitable for people who are wrong due to ignorance.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73223
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Delusions of grandeur, together with the vicious, vindictive streak so common in religious zealots...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC NATURE OF THE "NEW ATHEISM"
DANCE, MOTHERFUCKER$, DANCE
Bourgeois "scientists" who are well rewarded for their subservience to the capitalist system are the least to know how the REAL WORLD operates.
These little insignificant fools try to use science to destroy every mystery in the universe...
but not this one!
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38206
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
That's very funny. Some of those old guys can really shake it!superuniverse wrote:
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Nothing compared to their women
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38206
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Reminds me of this classic...
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
THE ARGUMENT FROM SCIENCE - EINSTEIN'S THEORY OF RELATIVITY AND TIME TRAVEL:
Einstein puts the final nail in the coffin of atheism…
Atheists deny their own life element…
LIGHT OR DEATH, ATHEISTS?
********************************
***************************LIGHT*********
************************************
E=MC²
Einstein puts the final nail in the coffin of atheism…
Atheists deny their own life element…
LIGHT OR DEATH, ATHEISTS?
********************************
***************************LIGHT*********
************************************
E=MC²
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 17990
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I just can't imagine God being all that angry at someone who doesn't bother believing. Some of us may well lack the intellect, and how is that our fault? Others may simply require more to believe, and who's going to be mad about that?
When you think about it, the God who is angry about these things is not likely to be the same God willing to lay down its life for others. At least, that sort of anger doesn't typically remind us of selflessness, does it?
When you think about it, the God who is angry about these things is not likely to be the same God willing to lay down its life for others. At least, that sort of anger doesn't typically remind us of selflessness, does it?
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73223
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Angry gods are imagined by angry people. Gentle gods are imagined by gentle people...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests