Spygate is unravelling

[Seabass]

Yes, attack the source, rather than address the information.

That should increase your social credit score.

Yeah, and if you cite Infowars, Der Stürmer, or The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, I'll reject those too.

[Cunt]

If you don't know about the kerning/corney thing, you can't even understand the excuse I offered the FBI (which could mean they were 'set up')

It could indeed be total bullshit, but it makes a lot more sense that there was a coverup, as opposed to the official story of his death.

[Cunt]

Yes, attack the source, rather than address the information.

That should increase your social credit score.

Yeah, and if you cite Infowars, Der Stürmer, or The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, I'll reject those too.

Alex Jones is an entertaining fucker. I enjoy his loud, boistrous style. Doesn't mean I believe him.

He recently did an interview, where he got fact-checked in real time. The most outrageous things he claims checked out. It points to the way he misdirects.

One of the most artful ways to lie is to tell the truth, and tell the whole truth, but tell it in a way that is completely unbelievable.

He uses that, in my opinion.

[Joe]

If you don't know about the kerning/corney thing, you can't even understand the excuse I offered the FBI (which could mean they were 'set up')

It could indeed be total bullshit, but it makes a lot more sense that there was a coverup, as opposed to the official story of his death.

It also makes more sense that the Washington Metro police asked the FBI to help with an unsolved murder so that the situation had changed since 2018. It makes even better sense that before publishing allegations of a cover-up, a competent news organization would have contacted the Washington Metro police and asked them about it.

Instead they theorized in advance of the facts, which as you know from reading Sherlock Holmes stories as a kid, is a capital mistake.

[Cunt]

It could be what you say, but what did Assange say about it?

The recently released audio tapes of him talking to the US government were enlightening, but the source will be attacked. (snowden commented on that exact fact, by the way)

[Joe]

It could be what you say, but what did Assange say about it?

The recently released audio tapes of him talking to the US government were enlightening, but the source will be attacked. (snowden commented on that exact fact, by the way)

Either way, Gateway Pundit's hasn't done the due diligence a competent reporter takes for granted. That's not surprising since it grew from a blog.

[Cunt]

It could be what you say, but what did Assange say about it?

The recently released audio tapes of him talking to the US government were enlightening, but the source will be attacked. (snowden commented on that exact fact, by the way)

Either way, Gateway Pundit's hasn't done the due diligence a competent reporter takes for granted. That's not surprising since it grew from a blog.

Did you understand the kerning thing? Or is the information tainted for you because it originated in a q post?

[Joe]

It could be what you say, but what did Assange say about it?

The recently released audio tapes of him talking to the US government were enlightening, but the source will be attacked. (snowden commented on that exact fact, by the way)

Either way, Gateway Pundit's hasn't done the due diligence a competent reporter takes for granted. That's not surprising since it grew from a blog.

Did you understand the kerning thing? Or is the information tainted for you because it originated in a q post?

Have you demonstrated its relevance to anything?

[Cunt]

Did you understand the kerning thing? Or is the information tainted for you because it originated in a q post?

Have you demonstrated its relevance to anything?

No, but q did.

If you don't understand, it's ok. Many can't take information in if it is from a 'wrong' source.

[Joe]

Did you understand the kerning thing? Or is the information tainted for you because it originated in a q post?

Have you demonstrated its relevance to anything?

No, but q did.

If you don't understand, it's ok. Many can't take information in if it is from a 'wrong' source.

You mean like that op-ed you wouldn't read because it was in the Guardian?

[Cunt]

Getting back to the kerning thing, it is a clearly laid out example of foia avoidance. It wouldn't ever be important unless you sought to seek information from a government.

[Joe]

We never got to the kerning thing. Maybe you should post a link instead of oblique references and poisoning the well.

[Cunt]

We never got to the kerning thing. Maybe you should post a link instead of oblique references and poisoning the well.

I can't.

I know what happened, and the facts around it (even if it didn't happen) are real enough. I don't know where to get the relevant q post, and don't like surfing those sites where he is posted. (I'm more of a lurker)

What kerning is?

It's the space between letters in displayed text.

In a gov't document, in which Comey as mentioned several times, a search yielded no results (like a ctrl-f). Closer inspection showed that what looked like 'Comey' was showing in results as 'Corney', with the space between the r and n reduced to cause it to look different.

I may not be explaining it well...here is a ...(caution, I found an article about it, seems reasonable enough, but I am unfamiliar with this source)

Far more significant is an unheralded change. The Corney/Comey strangeness has largely been fixed. With the new, revised version, my computer now only recognizes two “Corney”s as “Comey”s, and nearly 20 “Comey”s are properly identified by the key-word search function. And yet, though clearly some sort of change has been made affecting word searches, the Corney/Comey conundrum goes entirely without mention in the listing of changes and revisions to the document. RealClearInvestigations contacted Horowitz’s office to ask about the revisions, but were told that anyone who could speak to the issue was out of the office for the holiday week.

The revision has replaced the original report at the OIG website, and with it has gone easy access to the document at the center of the strangeness. But just because there isn’t easy access doesn’t mean there isn’t access. It turns out the Comey/Corney effect resisted eradication. Each inspector general has his or her own website. It was at the Department of Justice OIG site that the Horowitz report was posted with much fanfare on Dec. 9. It was at that same website that -- with rather less fanfare; indeed with no hoopla at all – that the original report was quietly replaced with the revised version.

[Joe]

We never got to the kerning thing. Maybe you should post a link instead of oblique references and poisoning the well.

I can't.

I know what happened, and the facts around it (even if it didn't happen) are real enough. I don't know where to get the relevant q post, and don't like surfing those sites where he is posted. (I'm more of a lurker)

What kerning is?

It's the space between letters in displayed text.

In a gov't document, in which Comey as mentioned several times, a search yielded no results (like a ctrl-f). Closer inspection showed that what looked like 'Comey' was showing in results as 'Corney', with the space between the r and n reduced to cause it to look different.

I may not be explaining it well...here is a ...(caution, I found an article about it, seems reasonable enough, but I am unfamiliar with this source)

Far more significant is an unheralded change. The Corney/Comey strangeness has largely been fixed. With the new, revised version, my computer now only recognizes two “Corney”s as “Comey”s, and nearly 20 “Comey”s are properly identified by the key-word search function. And yet, though clearly some sort of change has been made affecting word searches, the Corney/Comey conundrum goes entirely without mention in the listing of changes and revisions to the document. RealClearInvestigations contacted Horowitz’s office to ask about the revisions, but were told that anyone who could speak to the issue was out of the office for the holiday week.

The revision has replaced the original report at the OIG website, and with it has gone easy access to the document at the center of the strangeness. But just because there isn’t easy access doesn’t mean there isn’t access. It turns out the Comey/Corney effect resisted eradication. Each inspector general has his or her own website. It was at the Department of Justice OIG site that the Horowitz report was posted with much fanfare on Dec. 9. It was at that same website that -- with rather less fanfare; indeed with no hoopla at all – that the original report was quietly replaced with the revised version.

Well, the source doesn't really matter because the article shows it's work. I can see u/Lumyai's reasoning and decide if I think it's plausible. One thing he or she didn't seem to account for is that unlike most of the words with an "m" in them, Comey is a proper name and might have been handled differently. I don't know this, but if I really wanted to find out I could.

I won't because it's not that important. Worst case, the IG's office rebuilt the index after applying their updates, whether in response to a conspiracy theory or because it was automatic I don't know.

I do like Corney though. That's pretty funny.

[Cunt]

I won't because it's not that important. Worst case, the IG's office rebuilt the index after applying their updates, whether in response to a conspiracy theory or because it was automatic I don't know.

I do like Corney though. That's pretty funny.

That is maybe a plausable innocent reason for it. My point though, was that just because the FBI didn't find anything, then did (wrt Seth Rich) doesn't indicate they were 'the fuckers'.

Fuckers could be confounding them.

With the recent big hacks (solarwind) I think damn near anything could be compromised. They found lots of targeted systems in the US. I'm not sure my government would know if they were hacked. Fuckers can be smart.

I probably wouldn't.

Oh, and the solarwinds hack is legit, but Dominion deleted the logo from their website. I heard reports that they said they don't use solarwinds, but that was sketchy. And a bit off-topic anyway.