Seabass wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 5:18 pm
Hermit wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:46 am
Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:54 am
Was that not true of all armies? Even voluntary ones.
No. Even if true, it's irrelevant. Seabass mentioned "all Germans who supported the Nazi party". He claimed that all of them were fascists. I am not sure what he meant with "who supported the Nazi party", but both my parents were in the Hitler Youth. They had no choice. Three of my great-uncles and two of my great-aunts were members of the Nazi party. All five were teachers. They had no choice either. Had they refused membership of the NSDAP (that's the Nazi party), they would have lost their livelihood. No NSDAP membership meant no teaching job. Joining the NSDAP wasn't such a difficult decision to make after the Enabling Act in 1933. War lay six years in the future and systematic genocide of Jews lay another two or three years beyond that.
I'm not talking about Germans who had no choice. I thought I'd clarified that here:
Seabass wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 12:48 am
Of course I'm not talking about the Germans who were forced into Nazism.
I'm talking about actual supporters of the party and the movement and the ideology. When I make these comparisons I'm talking about early stages of Nazism/fascism, obviously. Forced Nazification came later. Forced Trumpification is not here... yet...
Seabass wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:35 am
Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 12:54 am
What does it really mean to support a regime you have no control or power over?
Eh? I support the regime when I pay taxes. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the people who want him in power, the people who vote for him, who donate to his campaign, who buy his merch, the people who work for him and his campaign, his cheerleaders on TV, his rally goers, and so on.
My reply was to your earlier post, which I took the trouble to quote. This one:
Seabass wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:29 pm
Would it be unfair to call all Germans who supported the Nazi party fascists? Many of them didn't check all the boxes, but they were supporters of a fascist movement, no?
Seabass wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 5:18 pm
Trump's hordes of red-hatted idiots wear those hats because they want to.
Yes, they are no less despicable than the psycho they follow and try to emulate, but they constitute nowhere near the majority of people who voted him into office in 2016. You dismissed JimC's allusion to that effect with a rhetorical question I replied to, and you ignored
Brian Peacock's post to that effect altogether.
In my opinion Trump is first and foremost an extreme example of a narcissist who exploits and encourages the base aspects of the uneducated and downtrodden masses. If he saw a way of exploiting left wing ideologies, he'd go that way. We are lucky that he is such a lazy fuckwit, spending more time blurting out inchoate tweets and looking forward to his next hamberder than working systematically and unceasingly at becoming an omnipotent dictator the way Hitler and Stalin did. His enablers, particularly Mitch McConnell, are much more dangerous.