Spygate is unravelling

[Tero]

So Obama's crime is still the same? Operating as president while black.

[Cunt]

So Obama's crime is still the same? Operating as president while black.

As far as you can see, he did nothing at all wrong.

Would you treat him differently if he was white, or brown?

[Joe]

1. What exactly is the crime (the actual charge)?
2. What the evidence that proves the crime?

And you can't answer them.

Fair enough. I expect the formal charges will be made at the right time. I explained what I thought was done wrong, but you want to insist I can't define it, so...something something.

As for the rest of your whining, you're the Cunt who started this thread so quit your bitching. If you didn't want to be called on your BS, you shouldn't have posted it.

Do you think it is a conpsiracy theory?

Why so intent on attacking MY understanding (or lack of it)? Is the sketchy attack on the sitting president of no interest to you?

So if you think this Shapiro guy has the answers, why didn't you provide a link?

He has links all over. You can find him on youtube, or you can find others (Bongino?) who have a different view than the standard media/democratic party view.

But insist I should feed it to you in small, mild-tasting spoonfuls. It makes perfect sense.

So you can't provide a link to this great argument Shapiro supposedly made? After all you said

Why not check what Shapiro has to say? Is it because he has clear and tight arguments, which you couldn't refute?

But you can't point to it. All I've seen from Shapiro is well polished misdirection that never comes to a substantive point. It's great stuff for people who already agree, but not so much for real answers to reasonable questions.

If you've got something better, let's see it.

As I've said before, it's your credibility pal.

[Cunt]

But you can't point to it. All I've seen from Shapiro is well polished misdirection that never comes to a substantive point. It's great stuff for people who already agree, but not so much for real answers to reasonable questions.

If you've got something better, let's see it.

As I've said before, it's your credibility pal.

Be bored, that's ok. It looks like WAY worse than the stuff Trump was accused of (and cleared of, in my opinion)

It seems OK with everyone that he (his FBI) clearly set up Flynn, and some of them are still SURE that Trump colluded with Russia.

[Joe]

But you can't point to it. All I've seen from Shapiro is well polished misdirection that never comes to a substantive point. It's great stuff for people who already agree, but not so much for real answers to reasonable questions.

If you've got something better, let's see it.

As I've said before, it's your credibility pal.

Be bored, that's ok. It looks like WAY worse than the stuff Trump was accused of (and cleared of, in my opinion)

It seems OK with everyone that he (his FBI) clearly set up Flynn, and some of them are still SURE that Trump colluded with Russia.

I'm bored because you're boring me. You promised me a T-Bone steak of an argument and can't even muster a veggie burger.

Bad Cunt!

[Tero]

Trump DOJ finds no case

AC9B53BC-5703-4785-9247-E447E7444BA3.jpeg (47.91 KiB) Viewed 1240 times

[Cunt]

NPR? That unbiased media outlet?

I guess it's over then. Keep cheering for Biden, Tero. Hitch your whole wagon to that star!

[Joe]

It's in my local paper too. It's paywalled, but I think you get a few free articles.

https://gazette.com/ap/politics/barr-sa ... erail-next

As for its bias, the Gazette is a conservative paper in a Trump stronghold. Not that I care. I like that they take pains to be accurate in their reporting, and it shows.

Of course their Editorial page is Libertarian La-la Land, enough that they published Seth regularly before he got an honest job.

[Cunt]

from the article...

Barr repeated his belief that “what happened to the president" as a result of the FBI's investigation into whether his 2016 campaign conspired with Russia was “abhorrent” and a “grave injustice.” He has appointed John Durham, the U.S. Attorney for Connecticut, to investigate whether crimes were committed as intelligence and law enforcement officials examined Russian election interference.

So what happened will be serious crime ('grave injustice') and either the bosses knew, or they didn't.

I think the bosses knew. Biden requested the unmasking, and has lied about it since.

If they build a solid case against the rest of the Dems, it won't be needed to investigate Obama or Biden. Their level of involvement will be obvious.

[Cunt]

I suppose that if your goal is losing weight, that's probably okay, right? It's been some time since I was into the numbers of fitness, but I recall lower intensity effort was preferred for weight loss.

Is that still the prevailing belief?

'Preferred for weight loss' varies depending on experience. It keeps the calculations simpler, and fits much better with beginners in general.

I'll possibly refocus on it after this training block (May) when my old bones have homeostasisted just right.

I have a good mix of priorities, but basically, my goal is to lose an amount at a specific rate.

Hit that goal, to within a pound, from November at the start, til May (last week)

Now I have to choose whether more weight loss, or something else. Frankly, I'm still probably going to aim to reduce bodyfat. It may cost me a bit of muscle mass, but I would rather be lighter/weaker if it means carrying less fat. Especially at my age.

I could do the same (with trickier calculations) with a more cardio-challenging run program, but there are a few things 'damping everything down'.

Mainly, I'm old. I'm trying to do everything daily, and gently. If I can't recover in a day, to do it all again, I've done too much.

I've shifted my weightlifting to include rest days, and longer rest between sets. I'm able to do much more, which will mean more strength/muscle over the next training block.

Aaaahhhh.

Flynn seems significant somehow. If he withdraws his guiltly plea, I think it will hint that there was something inappropriate going on.

See, I knew back then. So did all of you. Now he's like a CUNT-HAIR from being freed, and you still insist there is nothing to this because I don't have evidence organized well enough.

It makes it all sound like the Seth Rich murder/DNC data leak connection might be more than a conspiracy theory.

Um...guys...

Was Seth the source of the wikileaks thing?

His lawyer (Sidney somethingorother) just announced that there was stuff on the Weiner laptop which should be investigated. Tens of thousands of State Dept. emails, along with whatever the perv had saved on the same machine.

Again, might not be relevant.

So between this and the wikileaks emails, does anyone still think the conspiracy theory about elite pedophile rings bribing politicians is too stupid to take seriously?
Nxvmm, Epstein, Prince Andrew, Gates, Hefner, Weinstein and I'm sure I'm missing a few...

[rainbow]

So Obama's crime is still the same? Operating as president while black.

As far as you can see, he did nothing at all wrong.

Would you treat him differently if he was white, or brown?

He is white. That is how most Africans see Obama.

[BarnettNewman]

NPR? That unbiased media outlet?

I guess it's over then. Keep cheering for Biden, Tero. Hitch your whole wagon to that star!

Post your own? Oh that’s right, you can’t because they don’t exist.

[Cunt]

NPR? That unbiased media outlet?

I guess it's over then. Keep cheering for Biden, Tero. Hitch your whole wagon to that star!

Post your own? Oh that’s right, you can’t because they don’t exist.

Stars exist! A wagon can only be metaphorically hitched to one of them, but the point was to encourage Tero to keep cheering for Biden.

You can, too. He sounds like a real thought-leader for you (at least based on the few posts of yours I've seen here)

[Tero]

Obama: still OK to spy on crooked Trump. A president can do that!

[Cunt]

Obama: still OK to spy on crooked Trump. A president can do that!

The issue is that someone spied on Flynn, who was a US citizen, and thus had 'rights'.

Whoever leaked his info to the media, committed an offense. Biden was one of the unmaskers, then claimed (quite recently) that he didn't know about it.

Sure though, it's ok with you that Obama spied. He was just doing it because letting a Republican have a fair shot at beating him was beyond the pale...