Spygate is unravelling

[Cunt]

I'm not surprised you guys don't see the crime. Some news agencies are implicated in some of this. The leaks may have started with corrupt government officials (the same day as Flynn's unmasking, for example) but the recievers of the leaks who republished them, knew they were working for one party.

Knowingly fucking over a gullible public. That gullible public probably thinks Obama had a 'scandal-free' presidency lol

[BarnettNewman]

I'm not surprised you guys don't see the crime. Some news agencies are implicated in some of this. The leaks may have started with corrupt government officials (the same day as Flynn's unmasking, for example) but the recievers of the leaks who republished them, knew they were working for one party.

Knowingly fucking over a gullible public. That gullible public probably thinks Obama had a 'scandal-free' presidency lol

1. What exactly is the crime (the actual charge)?
2. What the evidence that proves the crime?

[Cunt]

I'm not surprised you guys don't see the crime. Some news agencies are implicated in some of this. The leaks may have started with corrupt government officials (the same day as Flynn's unmasking, for example) but the recievers of the leaks who republished them, knew they were working for one party.

Knowingly fucking over a gullible public. That gullible public probably thinks Obama had a 'scandal-free' presidency lol

1. What exactly is the crime (the actual charge)?
2. What the evidence that proves the crime?

There are lots of them if you look, so I don't know which are most important, but I can tell by your questions you haven't found any.

Unmasking Flynn, (and lying about it later) led to the authorities threatening his kid, and him with charges in order get at the information they wanted (that Trump was working with Russia)

So the spying that started it all, is probably the biggie, partly because using workarounds to spy on US citizens was happening, but also because of the cover up.

The cover up of the crime, and the risk the criminals took to do it, should be in Durhams hands for now, but if you can't see a lot of the crimes, it might be because your sources are...well...knowingly fucking over a gullible public.

[Tero]

Continues with Biden

[Tero]

[Tyrannical]

1. What exactly is the crime (the actual charge)?
2. What the evidence that proves the crime?

Someone leaked a FISA court approved phone tap transcript to the press. I assume that is somehow illegal

The evidence of course is the news paper report on the call.

The list of possible suspects who could have leaked it is rather short...

[Cunt]

9602D327-AA3E-4C1C-90AA-C43BD60276A1.png

not a hint of scandal in the Obama administration

Continues with Biden

Who is it that wrote 'not a hint of scandal'?

I could find some hints. Heck, probably even some innuendos, accusations and public requests for answers, without looking too hard...

[Joe]

1. What exactly is the crime (the actual charge)?
2. What the evidence that proves the crime?

Someone leaked a FISA court approved phone tap transcript to the press. I assume that is somehow illegal

The evidence of course is the news paper report on the call.

The list of possible suspects who could have leaked it is rather short...

Someone somehow committed a crime according to some newspaper....

Hang the cunt!

[Cunt]

Start with the newspapers. Then maybe a coincidence, anti-trust lawsuit against google.

Who have been weird.

[BarnettNewman]

1. What exactly is the crime (the actual charge)?
2. What the evidence that proves the crime?

Someone leaked a FISA court approved phone tap transcript to the press. I assume that is somehow illegal

The evidence of course is the news paper report on the call.

The list of possible suspects who could have leaked it is rather short...

Someone somehow committed a crime according to some newspaper....

Hang the cunt!

Exactly.

[L'Emmerdeur]

Perceived opposition to Trump is the crime, let's not mince words.

[Cunt]

Perceived opposition to Trump is the crime, let's not mince words.

Whoever leaked the unmasked US citizens name to the media, is guilty of a crime no matter who is in office.

Since it is Trump's opposition who did it though, no-one will care.

I mean, unless they care about rule of law more than the Dems...

[L'Emmerdeur]

OK then. Obamagate = leaking a name. Let's get a full US Senate committee on that. Leave no stone unturned and get Attorney General Barr to prosecute to the full extent of the law.

[Cunt]

OK then. Obamagate = leaking a name.

Your understanding of it is shockingly bad.

What are your sources? Have you tried the most trusted name in news? The lawmakers critical of the actions? Some cunt on a forum who doesn't use his right name?

Let's get a full US Senate committee on that. Leave no stone unturned and get Attorney General Barr to prosecute to the full extent of the law.

OK. He might need help. Sessions will (or maybe did?) find someone to help with the sorting.

[Tero]

Impeach Obama! with hold his pension! withdraw Nobel!

The Daily Edge
@TheDailyEdge
May 11
Lawyer
@BradMossEsq
shuts down #ObamaGate, destroys every numbskull #IMPOTUS argument and leaves Fox News host speechless in one brilliant 60-second summation. Case closed! (via
@Acyn

https://thedailyedge.substack.com/p/oba ... 60-seconds

enjoy the Sarah Cooper video on Twitter
https://twitter.com/sarahcpr/status/1260028573693272068