Cunt wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 6:27 pm
Joe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 5:47 pm
Cunt wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 3:30 pm
Joe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 1:59 pm
Cunt wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 4:05 am
Michelle Obama identifies as she/her. Calling her 'him' is probably a hatecrime.
Or a hatecrime hoax...I have trouble keeping track.
Look, whether you think she's a smart, politically viable lawyer-type, or she's really 'Big Mike', Barry's tranny hubby, she's a better candidate than Biden.
The worst they can fling at her is riding coattails and being a bit bulky. Biden has FAR too many skeletens to be the real candidate.
I'd stick with what I know if I were you.
Oh, come on. I was right about Obama being a viable option for VP. I was right about Biden not being much of an offering (despite being their 'best')
It doesn't take much, when things are this bad.
Cunt wrote:I don't know. I don't know the players, nor the history, well enough
I know that before JFKjr died, he thought poorly enough of Biden to accuse him of being a traitor. I know he is so bad at speaking, that he won't have debates. I know that Obama makes a better dent as candidate, and as to the history, well, it looks like your instincts (to say that Obama was unqualified) weren't all that good either.
Joe, look into the q stuff. Get a feel for it. You'll find (without a doubt) that I'm right about the important question (is q a white house insider?) because either answer should make their posts worthy of investigation.
No you don't "know that before JFKjr died, he thought poorly enough of Biden to accuse him of being a traitor." Not based on what you've provided.
In fact, the file dump you linked to provides physical evidence that John John wasn't the author. It's mentioned in the podcast I linked to as well.
Did you see it? Can you tell me what it is?
Nope. Sounds like bullshit.
This is how I got tricked...the pages referenced in the original source were from page 55 and later in the doc, and I initially found a copy of the doc online. Now those pages aren't accessible, and the source is gone.
It's a pretty classic 'fool the idiots' trick.
I've watched me fall for scholars mate, and thinking to myself 'yup, that there is the scholars mate')
Not bullshit, it's really there in the FBI docs, in the podcast, and the review of the podcast. The reason I linked the last two is because the site you linked to is a pay site ($8.95 USD/Month), and I figured I'd save you having to do the 30 day trial to read it. Here's the summary from the review.
However, former FBI agent and certified fraud examiner Jim Ellis believes the letter wasn’t written by JFK Jr. at all, despite his name being signed at the bottom. “The FBI investigates these [types] of things all the time and 99 percent are from cranks,” he explains. “If somebodyreally means to do harm to a senator or congressman, they typically don’t telegraph their intentions.”
Another form of evidence Ellis reveals that seemed to clear JFK Jr. of authoring the letter was “indented writing” found on the paper. This refers to a message written on a page on top of the piece of paper that the note was written on, leaving invisible indented letters on the page. They seemed to read, “I am writing you. I had a heart attack. Missed one $55 insurance premium and they canceled me after 18 years. I got a cancellation notice and I’m 62 years old.” If this is accurate, it would eliminate JFK Jr. as a suspect.
Here's the actual “indented writing” from the FBI file.
This isn't the only time this file has been referenced WRT to Biden. Did you know
Joe Biden was involved in a plot to kidnap JFK Jr. according to the just declassified FBI files, and also made several threats.
I'd say you can't make this shit up, but clearly some people can. There must be good money in fake news.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
"Wisdom requires a flexible mind." - Dan Carlin
"If you vote for idiots, idiots will run the country." - Dr. Kori Schake