Scot Dutchy wrote:Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2020 11:32 pm
Scot Dutchy wrote:NineBerry wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2020 11:24 am
Scot Dutchy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2020 11:03 am
Not according to my data.
This is sorted by known cases. I was speaking of deaths per million citizens. Click on that column to sort accordingly.
Deaths are a very bad metric as none are investigated. Known cases is not 100% either but we have been saying that about all the figures.
Yes we have. If you search this thread for 'epidemiological' you find posts saying the data is less than complete, but to expect to have that kind of over-arching post-pandemic perspective today is unrealistic - and to cite it's absence as a reason for governments to ignore their public duty is to found an opinion on wishful thinking and ignorance.
Dont insult. We have no data on the deaths. It is totally incomplete. We dont know if these people would have died or did they die of the virus. The numbers are so low and the models have been proven totally inaccurate. So please stop waffling.
Lol. Poppycock! We have lots of data on the deaths. We can see the figures for ourselves, watch how they change over time and understand the trends at a glance. The figures may be incomplete, they may not take account of all the information available at the moment or of all of the factors in play, but an absence of complete and infallible data is neither here nor there. Covid-19 is a novel coronavirus - the medical, epidemiological, and public health specialists are having to understand it as they go, and governments are applying or ignoring that understanding as they see fit or as they are able to.
Of course we don't know if these people would have died anyway - that kind of prediction is best left to soothsayer and oracles - but what we can do is map the deaths against data we already have and against trends in that data. That shows a massive and unprecedented spike in deaths whether you break that down nationally, demographically, or even globally. This spike can be fully accounted for by the pandemic - we don't have to cast about for unknown factors or causes. If you were interested you could compare the data yourself to refute or support your own intuition - but you have a ready-made excuse at hand to avoid that don't you? You don't trust the numbers.
This is why I said you were opinionating from ignorance and have nothing more than wishful thinking to offer. Just like saying "All statements are false" is a logical paradox so is saying that the numbers are lower because you can't trust the numbers. You might not accept that the death rate in the Netherlands or the UK this week is about 2x the average weekly death rate and at an even higher rate still when compared to what would normally be expected for this time of year. But to maintain your opinion you'll have to discredit the mortality data from previous years as well as discount the current figures on Covid-19 related mortalities - and doing that would be an exercise in denialism, plain and simple.
That's where your opinion stands with me at the moment - which is to say it doesn't stand up at all.