Trumps Greatest Achievements

[Cunt]

So russia again...

It's a fun chorus, but relatively unconvincing.

[Tero]

[Cunt]

Trump HAS acquited himself well
(spoilered to protect them)

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

[Cunt]

Trumps Greatest Achievements?
(spoilered because maybe?)

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

[Tero]

A-quit while you are ahead. Or just barely followed.

Close the thread, mods.

[Hermit]

Daggles, I hope you'll understand why I did not bother checking the background of the rest of the CEO resignations in your list. You obviously got it from either some batshit crazy site specialising in spreading nutbaggish conspiracy theories, or a site from right wing sources which found this "information" useful for its agenda. And you accepted this crap without checking any of it. If you possessed as much as a shred of scepticism it was well and truly out of action.

I get that you hate Trump, and will find evidence to support your views.

I found evidence that two of the people on your list who have stepped down as CEOs have stepped up to become chairmen of the same company, and one will step down in April for being a disaster to the company he is chairman of. Do you have any evidence that this is not so?

The pedophile ring running the world is a nutbag conpsiracy too.

Prince Andrew, Epstein, Weinstein, Wexner...

I have no doubt Weinstein is guilty of the sex crimes he was convicted of and that Epstein would have been found guilty of sex crimes, including rape of underage women, had he not committed suicide or been murdered. The behaviour of Andrew Windsor, a photograph and his association with Epstein leads me to believe that he also is a predatory sex criminal. Then there are Bill Clinton's 26 alleged flights on the Lolita Express and his visits to Epstein's privately owned island I never heard any denials about... I never heard of Wexner, so I have formed no opinion about him.

There is sufficient evidence for the existence of a paedophile (more accurately, hebephile) with very rich, powerful and influential members, of which Epstein was one, but adding the CEOs of the list of companies you have posted, I leave to people for whom supporting evidence does not matter and who reject evidence that they left for reasons other than being implicated in sex crime rings (like the two promotions and one spectacular performance failure I mentioned) out of hand.

[Cunt]

Daggles, I hope you'll understand why I did not bother checking the background of the rest of the CEO resignations in your list. You obviously got it from either some batshit crazy site specialising in spreading nutbaggish conspiracy theories, or a site from right wing sources which found this "information" useful for its agenda. And you accepted this crap without checking any of it. If you possessed as much as a shred of scepticism it was well and truly out of action.

I get that you hate Trump, and will find evidence to support your views.

I found evidence that two of the people on your list who have stepped down as CEOs have stepped up to become chairmen of the same company, and one will step down in April for being a disaster to the company he is chairman of. Do you have any evidence that this is not so?

Why would I need it?

I didn't claim anything other than that Trump would take credit for such things - not whether they were true or not.

There is sufficient evidence for the existence of a paedophile (more accurately, hebephile) with very rich, powerful and influential members, of which Epstein was one, but adding the CEOs of the list of companies you have posted, I leave to people for whom supporting evidence does not matter and who reject evidence that they left for reasons other than being implicated in sex crime rings (like the two promotions and one spectacular performance failure I mentioned) out of hand.

Yes, you here, in a friendly environment, can make the distinction between hebephile and pedophile. Do you think the politicians will allow the same subtlety?

Or do you think they will all be called pedos by their detractors? (that's what I think will happen)

Why do you think ABC suppressed the Amy Robichar story?

Why do you think they reacted the way they did?

I ask because it looks an awful lot like being supportive of the privacy of the criminals, to preserve access to those valuable information channels into the Royal family etc. (exactly as Amy R. claimed on camera)

Is continuing to defend the Royal Hebephile et. al. earning more respect for the media Trump seems determined to destroy?

[Cunt]

Among his lesser achievements is another that isn't really all that 'ethical'. Distressingly effective though.

Even his close allies don't seem to be safe.

"This is clearly an impeachable offense," said an unbiased constitutional scholar working at the Destroy Donald Trump Foundation, testifying before the House Judiciary Committee. "Trump has offered Pence a clear quid pro quo, granting him the VP role in exchange for access

Deep corruption. It might not be technically benefitting Trump, but I think we all can see how it is.

[Hermit]

Daggles, I hope you'll understand why I did not bother checking the background of the rest of the CEO resignations in your list. You obviously got it from either some batshit crazy site specialising in spreading nutbaggish conspiracy theories, or a site from right wing sources which found this "information" useful for its agenda. And you accepted this crap without checking any of it. If you possessed as much as a shred of scepticism it was well and truly out of action.

I get that you hate Trump, and will find evidence to support your views.

I found evidence that two of the people on your list who have stepped down as CEOs have stepped up to become chairmen of the same company, and one will step down in April for being a disaster to the company he is chairman of. Do you have any evidence that this is not so?

Why would I need it?

I didn't claim anything other than that Trump would take credit for such things - not whether they were true or not.

You've done rather more than that by repeatedly claiming a connection between Disney, Epstein and hebepaedophilia.

I don't know the whole terrain, but enjoy seeing the connection between ABC/Disney/the Epstein scandal.

ABC...isn't that the network that spiked the Epstein story?

So they covered for an elite, world-hopping convicted pedophile, and you want me to be convinced?

Holy shit, the only thing more hilarious would be if Disney owned ABC lol

...oh wait...

So when you posted a list of companies, including Disney, whose CEOs have "stepped down" and pretend you were not alluding to a connection between them and a Epstein / hebepaedophilia coverup, which you explicitly argued to be true, I can only laugh.

[Cunt]

So when you posted a list of companies, including Disney, whose CEOs have "stepped down" and pretend you were not alluding to a connection between them and a Epstein / hebepaedophilia coverup, which you explicitly argued to be true, I can only laugh.

You should stop laughing, it's making a fool of you.

The connection between Epstein and ABC is simple - they covered up for him (according to their reporter)

Between ABC and Disney? Is that the one you doubt?

When I listed the CEO's, it was to highlight what Trump will 'claim credit for' (a speculation, but only speculating that he'll grab credit)

Do you want to know what I think? Or what I understand the Republicans to be thinking?

They are often two different questions, but since you seem desperate to find a republican to disagree with, why not invite some to your forum discussions?

There must be many in your circles, who are republicans that you respect, right?

[Cunt]

So when you posted a list of companies, including Disney, whose CEOs have "stepped down" and pretend you were not alluding to a connection between them and a Epstein / hebepaedophilia coverup, which you explicitly argued to be true, I can only laugh.

wanted to seperate this...

Yes, I was alluding to that connection, which was wrong as hell.

You might be right about it not being connected. I would say probably you are.

Doesn't change how it will be used though, which IS my point. Ignore their pitch at your peril.

For example, it could ruin any appearance of your objectivity, by going into a 'Trumps greatest achievements' thread, and showing that you can't say anything positive about the guy. He simply can't be as bad as you pretend he is. Most of us can see that, and identify TDS pretty easily by now.

Well, not here, because something happened to all the 'non-Democrat' folk from this forum. But all over the real world, there are all kinds of people.

[Hermit]

When I listed the CEO's, it was to highlight what Trump will 'claim credit for' (a speculation, but only speculating that he'll grab credit)

Frankly, I don't believe you. Just noticed your latest post, so this bit has become irrelevant.

There must be many in your circles, who are republicans that you respect, right?

I don't see the connection with republicans and your belief that the "stepping down" of CEOs in the list of companies you posted has anything to do with an Epstein / hebepaedophilia coverup, but I'll reply to your question anyway. It comes in three parts.

1) Depending on which of the four surveys taken in the past two years is the most accurate anywhere between 40 and 52% of Australians are republicans. Even 52% is a disappointingly low figure. On the upside, the same four surveys indicate that percentage of people opposed to us republicans is even lower. It ranges from 20 to 48%. In my view monarchism is hopelessly anachronistic. Australia should have ditched its status as a constitutional monarchy and become a republic many years ago.

2) It stands to reason that somewhere between 40 and 52% of the people in my circles are republicans, but I don't know who they are because my care factor does not rise to the degree of asking the people in my circles about their views on the issue. While I would like Australia to become a republic I doubt it'll make a great deal of practical difference to the bulk of us whether our symbolic head of state is a monarch or a president.

3) The degree to which I respect a person is influenced in only a very minor way by him/her/it being a republican or a monarchist. Good and bad among both, to paraphrase Trump. I probably tend to respect republicans just a tiny bit more on average due to the fact that monarchists tend to be more class conscious, less egalitarian and perhaps just a little less empathetic (again, just on average, and not to a major degree) than republicans.

[Cunt]

3) The degree to which I respect a person is influenced

This part I can agree with.

Of course, you couldn't have imagined that, in this 'Trumps Greatest Achievements' thread, I was referring to Trump-republicans.

Interesting enough about Aus politics, but not the subject I was here about. See, I don't mind saying what I think his greatest achievements are.

Among them, showing how hilariously biased even the smartest people can be.

[pErvinalia]

Daggles, I hope you'll understand why I did not bother checking the background of the rest of the CEO resignations in your list. You obviously got it from either some batshit crazy site specialising in spreading nutbaggish conspiracy theories, or a site from right wing sources which found this "information" useful for its agenda. And you accepted this crap without checking any of it. If you possessed as much as a shred of scepticism it was well and truly out of action.

I get that you hate Trump, and will find evidence to support your views.

I found evidence that two of the people on your list who have stepped down as CEOs have stepped up to become chairmen of the same company, and one will step down in April for being a disaster to the company he is chairman of. Do you have any evidence that this is not so?

Why would I need it?

I didn't claim anything other than that Trump would take credit for such things - not whether they were true or not.

This is a thread about achievements, not things Trump takes credit for.

[Cunt]

This is a thread about achievements, not things Trump takes credit for.

are you sure you are talking about the same Trump as everyone else?