All Things Trump: Is it over yet?

[Tero]

Coronavirus is no biggie, says Trump. The month of April will kill it.
https://twitter.com/owillis/status/1226918856632999937
Ah, yes and that is when they kick off their dog beating and eating festival in Wuhan

[Cunt]

Are you familiar with the Epstein case?

If I gave you the brief rundown, would you think I was pitching a conspiracy theory about elite pedophiles with islands and sweetheart sentencing agreements?

I wouldn't blame you, but the truth about that is too weird to pitch as a conspiracy theory. Maybe when Randy Andy finally answers the FBI we'll understand more about it.

There isn't very much to understand.
Gone are the days when he would lock himsef in the study with a bottle of whisky and a revolver.

Is that so? Then why are they continuing the investigation after his death?

Not much to understand there. Except for understanding which government tentacle was last investigating him. Understanding THAT might make it sound more interesting.

Not to someone as well-informed as YOU, of course, but to those of us who don't have the full view.

[L'Emmerdeur]

Its primary (perhaps only) relevance is the behaviour it elicits from the mugs who subscribe to it.

If you keep being insulting, that might change my mind.

More likely would be demonstrating that you know how q verified it's identity after the 8kun reboot.

Are you familiar with the Epstein case?

If I gave you the brief rundown, would you think I was pitching a conspiracy theory about elite pedophiles with islands and sweetheart sentencing agreements?

I wouldn't blame you, but the truth about that is too weird to pitch as a conspiracy theory. Maybe when Randy Andy finally answers the FBI we'll understand more about it.

If I've given you the mistaken impression that I'm trying to change your mind, let me dispel that here. I thought it would be readily apparent that I'm merely taking part in the 'Cool Guy Does His Best to Enlighten Leftists With the True Doctrine of QAnon Leftism Despite Them Being Misled by Mainstream Media' game.

[Cunt]

Its primary (perhaps only) relevance is the behaviour it elicits from the mugs who subscribe to it.

If you keep being insulting, that might change my mind.

More likely would be demonstrating that you know how q verified it's identity after the 8kun reboot.

Are you familiar with the Epstein case?

If I gave you the brief rundown, would you think I was pitching a conspiracy theory about elite pedophiles with islands and sweetheart sentencing agreements?

I wouldn't blame you, but the truth about that is too weird to pitch as a conspiracy theory. Maybe when Randy Andy finally answers the FBI we'll understand more about it.

If I've given you the mistaken impression that I'm trying to change your mind, let me dispel that here. I thought it would be readily apparent that I'm merely taking part in the 'Cool Guy Does His Best to Enlighten Leftists With the True Doctrine of QAnon Leftism Despite Them Being Misled by Mainstream Media' game.

You couldn't change my mind, honestly. I think you are unable to view Trump honestly (for example) and it makes me quite distrustful of anything you post. It's like listening to CNN. (or Rebel, or BBC)

I like the things hinted at via q posts. (I think the Epstein story being buried is almost a bigger story than Epstein banging trafficked teens and flying around with world leaders)

It is significant to me if it is or is not coming from insiders, but not all that much. Same as any news outlet, they give hints and I can suspiciously investigate wherever appropriate.

If you think q is sketchy, great! If you don't apply that same label to large corporate-owned media companies, well, I guess that's normal.

[Cunt]

Judicial Watch is looking into the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich. It is suggested that he was the person to leak the emails to wikileaks.

Sounds like the 'spygate' inestigations are still going on.

And General Flynn is looking less and less like a guilty party, and more like some part of a cover up.

They can't even jail that old stoner (Roger) successfully.

[Tero]

EB988209-6041-4A67-B105-640F3196F599.jpeg (43.8 KiB) Viewed 1406 times

We've gotten to a turning point. It is now possible to dump Trump. If the senator is not running, they will keep quiet till Nov. Then they will come out with excuses.

If they are running, they will defend Trump, but just barely. Issue by issue.

[rainbow]

Is that so? Then why are they continuing the investigation after his death?

Of course they are investigating. They are turning over every little bit of evidence, and classifying it so that it won't get out. Too many important people could get hurt.

Not much to understand there. Except for understanding which government tentacle was last investigating him. Understanding THAT might make it sound more interesting.

Not to someone as well-informed as YOU, of course, but to those of us who don't have the full view.

It really doesn't make any difference which puppet is having its strings pulled. I would've thought that was obvious.

[Brian Peacock]

Judicial Watch is looking into the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich. It is suggested that he was the person to leak the emails to wikileaks.

Sounds like the 'spygate' inestigations are still going on.

And General Flynn is looking less and less like a guilty party, and more like some part of a cover up.

They can't even jail that old stoner (Roger) successfully.

These are interesting pre-election talking points. How do you think their premises relate to the known facts?

[Tero]

Tweeted a few tweets to Trump, decorated with memes I have ready. Then gave up on tweeting for the day.

[Tero]

This one is always good

[Cunt]

Judicial Watch is looking into the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich. It is suggested that he was the person to leak the emails to wikileaks.

Sounds like the 'spygate' inestigations are still going on.

And General Flynn is looking less and less like a guilty party, and more like some part of a cover up.

They can't even jail that old stoner (Roger) successfully.

These are interesting pre-election talking points. How do you think their premises relate to the known facts?

I don't know that they do.

My worry is that most 'lefties' (I'll lump you in this time) don't follow this because it is a 'conspiracy theory'. (does it look like such on purpose?)

So now that you don't follow it, you don't know what sort of painting they are creating with those facts. You know full well what the dems / CNN are panting with those facts, but not the republicans.

I think Jussie Smollett (recently re-indicted), Gen. Flynn, Jeffreys Sessions and Epstein, and some others have played out EXACTLY like I expected, based on what the qanon community was discussing.

You could get a different picture from those principal players / facts, based on the story told.

This is going to be terrible for the Democratic party not because all the corruption is there (though it might be) but because of the managed narrative available via these facts.

Was Clinton a pedophile in the pocket of a billionaire pedophile ringleader? Or a sloppy hebephile idiot who partied with the wrong guys? Could the same facts draw either of those pictures?

Which brings me back to the main fact I am trying to focus on, and evaluate - is q a Trump official? Seems like the difference could be important.

[Cunt]

Is that so? Then why are they continuing the investigation after his death?

Of course they are investigating. They are turning over every little bit of evidence, and classifying it so that it won't get out. Too many important people could get hurt.

Not much to understand there. Except for understanding which government tentacle was last investigating him. Understanding THAT might make it sound more interesting.

Not to someone as well-informed as YOU, of course, but to those of us who don't have the full view.

It really doesn't make any difference which puppet is having its strings pulled. I would've thought that was obvious.

I thought it was interesting that it wasn't 'sex crimes unit' or 'human trafficking unit'.

But it doesn't make any difference to you, so I won't bother looking it up.

[Tero]

More deep state rants

[Tero]

rant continued

NYT

[Cunt]

Isn't the times the ones who just lied about qanon being identified by the FBI as a terrorist threat?

A tweeter called @prayingmedic did a FOIA request, and showed the document they refered to was not from the FBI.

Of course, you can believe them on this though.

What did they publish about the Smollett case? I mean when everyone still thought it was a 'hate crime investigation' instead of a 'Hollywood asshole pulls favours from politicians investigation'?