Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Pappa » Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:45 pm

Rumertron wrote:OK, but he was convicted in a Scottish after due process and we don't really know until an appeal goes through if it is an unsafe conviction. The suggestion is that he will die before the appeal has time to go through its process.

Given the above should he be released?
I'd say why not. 21 years is a bloody long time to spend in prison, reformed character or not.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Aug 13, 2009 4:09 pm

Pappa wrote:
Rumertron wrote:OK, but he was convicted in a Scottish after due process and we don't really know until an appeal goes through if it is an unsafe conviction. The suggestion is that he will die before the appeal has time to go through its process.

Given the above should he be released?
I'd say why not. 21 years is a bloody long time to spend in prison, reformed character or not.
He wasn't actually arrested until 1999.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Rum » Thu Aug 13, 2009 4:14 pm

There is an added element here, which sadly I suspect is colouring the thinking. Gadaffi is widely believed to have at the very least approved the bombing. Since then he has given up his nuclear programme and come into the 'tent' of good guys (hmmmm..).

I suspect there is a political desire to offer a symbolic reward..in addition to the millions in incentives already poured in.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Pappa » Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:05 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Pappa wrote:
Rumertron wrote:OK, but he was convicted in a Scottish after due process and we don't really know until an appeal goes through if it is an unsafe conviction. The suggestion is that he will die before the appeal has time to go through its process.

Given the above should he be released?
I'd say why not. 21 years is a bloody long time to spend in prison, reformed character or not.
He wasn't actually arrested until 1999.
20 years then, assuming he was on remand during his case. Still, a bloody long time to be locked up for.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:14 am

Pappa wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Pappa wrote:
Rumertron wrote:OK, but he was convicted in a Scottish after due process and we don't really know until an appeal goes through if it is an unsafe conviction. The suggestion is that he will die before the appeal has time to go through its process.

Given the above should he be released?
I'd say why not. 21 years is a bloody long time to spend in prison, reformed character or not.
He wasn't actually arrested until 1999.
20 years then, assuming he was on remand during his case. Still, a bloody long time to be locked up for.
err... 2009 - 1999 = ? :dono:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Pappa » Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:23 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Pappa wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Pappa wrote:
Rumertron wrote:OK, but he was convicted in a Scottish after due process and we don't really know until an appeal goes through if it is an unsafe conviction. The suggestion is that he will die before the appeal has time to go through its process.

Given the above should he be released?
I'd say why not. 21 years is a bloody long time to spend in prison, reformed character or not.
He wasn't actually arrested until 1999.
20 years then, assuming he was on remand during his case. Still, a bloody long time to be locked up for.
err... 2009 - 1999 = ? :dono:
:shifty:

OK.... 10 years for murdering lots of people.

Um... leaving the possibly dodgy conviction bit aside for the moment... I would probably say that he should do the 14 years then, unless he has only 3 months to live, in which case he could get early release on compassionate grounds (as is the current system). I think even multiple murderers should get a bit of freedom before they die, unless they're deemed to still be a risk.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:24 am

lordpasternack wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:What was compassionate about killing 270 people, and affecting the lives of thousands more?
Some contest that his conviction has always been unsafe. There is some doubt over whether he is actually guilty. He's currently attempting to appeal...
Everybody in prison says they're innocent. Some of them might be. Most aren't.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Ian » Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:45 am

He should be released... only if a pack of rabid rottweillers are going to be released right after him.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:52 am

Ian wrote:He should be released... only if a pack of rabid rottweillers are going to be released right after him.
What? You a dog-hater? :lay:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by lordpasternack » Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:40 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
lordpasternack wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:What was compassionate about killing 270 people, and affecting the lives of thousands more?
Some contest that his conviction has always been unsafe. There is some doubt over whether he is actually guilty. He's currently attempting to appeal...
Everybody in prison says they're innocent. Some of them might be. Most aren't.
It isn't just that he says he's innocent - it's that some of the evidence he was convicted based on is purportedly a little shaky. There is actually adequate room for some real doubt about his guilt.
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Trolldor » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:38 am

If he has three months left to live, what's the point of keeping him?
By all means keep an eye on him, but if his conviction is shaky then just let him out while it's reviewed.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:58 am

born-again-atheist wrote:If he has three months left to live, what's the point of keeping him?
By all means keep an eye on him, but if his conviction is shaky then just let him out while it's reviewed.
It isn't going to be reviewed.

One (of many) conspiracy theories behind all of this is that his illness is a fake that has been drummed up between the British and Libyan governments as an excuse to get him back to Libya and to prevent inconvenient details about who was behind the crash and what deals were made coming to light.

The appeal has been dropped in order to expedite his release on compassionate grounds.

Nobody will ever know what really happened. All we do know is that one of the men involved has served 10 years and is about to die. Feel free to speculate about the rest.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:08 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:...All we do know is that one of the men involved has served 10 years and is about to die...
We don't know he was involved.
Image

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Rum » Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:11 am

Horwood Beer-Master wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:...All we do know is that one of the men involved has served 10 years and is about to die...
We don't know he was involved.
Well either we trust the legal system or we don't. At this point he is convicted.

The latest development is that he has dropped his appeal (yesterday). I read elsewhere that he cannot be released if there is an appeal in process - which seems odd to me.

Also the Americans have expressed their unhappiness with his release on compassionate grounds so it looks like he is fucked.

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: Should the Lockerbie bomber be released?

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:31 am

Rumertron wrote:
Horwood Beer-Master wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:...All we do know is that one of the men involved has served 10 years and is about to die...
We don't know he was involved.
Well either we trust the legal system or we don't...
No sane person entirely trusts the legal system (still less the Scottish legal system).
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 17 guests