So we'll strike that 'evil incarnate' accusation from the record I guess.
Can we now touch on the point, that Mr Kavanaugh was/is partisan and clearly aligned with the GOP?
So we'll strike that 'evil incarnate' accusation from the record I guess.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
Sarcasm is pretty daring with quote-mining democrat shills around...good thing you aren't famous.Forty Two wrote: ↑Tue Oct 09, 2018 9:59 pmNo, Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer and Ginsburg have no party affiliations or preferences, and no political leanings which might impact their judicial opinions. Obviously, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Roberts and Kavanaugh, are arch-Republicans through and through, and are known to unfairly rule against political opponents.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
Wha...?
Based on the evidence, that seems like a very uncharitable conclusion at best. Breitbart has a better video to get the context of Booker's remarks.
So how to you get to Booker calling Kavanaugh "evil incarnate" from this?There is so much at stake here. This has nothing to do with politics; this has to do with who we are as moral beings. And so, I want to call on everybody — I’m not here to tell folk just what they should know. I’m here to call on folk to understand that in a moral moment there is no neutral. In a moral moment there is no bystanders. You are either complicit in the evil, you are either contributing to wrong or you are fighting against it.
There’s a saying in the Abrahamic faiths one of the Psalms that says ‘Yea though we walk through the valley of the shadow of death.’ We are walking through the valley of the shadow of death. But that doesn’t say ‘Though I sit in the valley of the shadow of death,’ it doesn’t say, ‘I’m watching on the sidelines of the valley of the shadow of death, it says, ‘I am walking through the valley of the shadow of death.’
None of those ever let fly a nakedly partisan rant like Kavanaugh did the other day. "Revenge for the Clintons", "leftist frenzy", etc...Forty Two wrote: ↑Tue Oct 09, 2018 9:59 pmNo, Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer and Ginsburg have no party affiliations or preferences, and no political leanings which might impact their judicial opinions. Obviously, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Roberts and Kavanaugh, are arch-Republicans through and through, and are known to unfairly rule against political opponents.
At what point do you think the baby needs must be carried to term rEv?
Interesting. When do you think the foetus becomes a person with all the rights that entails?
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 20 guests