Only in America

Guns don't kill threads; Ratz kill threads!
Post Reply
User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39939
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Brian Peacock » Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:58 am

Hermit wrote:
Forty Two wrote:
Mon Jul 02, 2018 4:22 pm
The Trump administration isn’t changing the rules that pertain to separating an adult from the child. [...] The new Trump policy is to prosecute all adults.
Sophistry at its best.

Forty Two wrote:...

Somehow, the entire system has to be fixed. And, I don't think many countries have moral standing to point fingers.
I'm not a country, nor do I represent a country in condemning the immoral actions of any state, whether that be working citizens to death in North Korean labour camps or separating the children of asylum seekers from their parents or careers in the US. One state-sponsored immorality is not downgraded or offset by the immorality of another. Nor is a right to a point of view, and to express it, dependent on, qualified, or legitimised, by anyone else's judgements as to the perceived moral rectitude of the nation in which they reside.

Nobody is criticising America for addressing its immigration issues - they're criticising Trump and his administration for their policy, for its operating principles and for its creul and callous implementation.

I think it is unhelpful to assume that somehow Trump is America, that criticising Trump is criticising America, that Trump's way is always and only ever the only way, and/or that the Trump way stands by default until someone has satisfied some arbitrary conditions for moral legitimacy or personally convinced you that there's a better way.

The question is not about what Australia does, or what the UK is doing. It's about American policy, and claiming that non-Americans forfeit their rights to assess, judge, and criticise because their own governments are less than perfect is a red-herring, and a way of shifting the focus and the burden of justification onto others.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Scot Dutchy
Posts: 19000
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
About me: Dijkbeschermer
Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Scot Dutchy » Wed Jul 04, 2018 10:23 am

Remember Brian he suffers very much from that deadly disease called Trumphititus.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51242
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Tero » Wed Jul 04, 2018 11:23 am

Woman, 92, killed son who tried putting her in assisted living, cops say
gets FREE assisted living in prison
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/03/ar ... s-say.html

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39939
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Brian Peacock » Wed Jul 04, 2018 11:54 am

Scot Dutchy wrote:Remember Brian he suffers very much from that deadly disease called Trumphititus.
Technically, that would be an inflammation of the Trump. Ouch!
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Scot Dutchy
Posts: 19000
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
About me: Dijkbeschermer
Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Scot Dutchy » Wed Jul 04, 2018 12:46 pm

Brian Peacock wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 11:54 am
Scot Dutchy wrote:Remember Brian he suffers very much from that deadly disease called Trumphititus.
Technically, that would be an inflammation of the Trump. Ouch!
Correct doctor. Quite incurable I am afraid. The only thing that can save him is a brain transplant. :{D
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Svartalf » Wed Jul 04, 2018 12:49 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 12:46 pm
Brian Peacock wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 11:54 am
Scot Dutchy wrote:Remember Brian he suffers very much from that deadly disease called Trumphititus.
Technically, that would be an inflammation of the Trump. Ouch!
Correct doctor. Quite incurable I am afraid. The only thing that can save him is a brain transplant. :{D
impossible, we don't have any drugs that would prevent the brain from rejecting the frump.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jul 05, 2018 2:51 pm

Brian Peacock wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:58 am

I'm not a country, nor do I represent a country in condemning the immoral actions of any state, whether that be working citizens to death in North Korean labour camps or separating the children of asylum seekers from their parents or careers in the US.
Well, let's see where we agree - I am opposed to DPRK labor camps, and separating children from asylum seekers. The issue with asylum seekers though, in the US, is that (a) most of the people apprehended crossing the Rio Grande are not "asylum seekers" (they're economic migrants, and subject to deportation). As a practical matter, any state must determine the identity of the people involved and evaluate any claim of immigration status, asylum or otherwise. Most detentions and seprations are short - hours or days. The problem with the asylum seeker detentions is that the US courts have said it's unlawful to detain the kids with the parents. That meant that the US either has to release the kids to a relative/friend or to the care of HHS after a short period of time (or they have to release the adult asylum seeker with the kids into the community, which means most of them are never seen again). If we remove the hysteria, the solution is simple: amend the law to provide for family detention (humanely) of asylum seekers while the case is evaluated and heard - just like every other western industrialized country does - however, in the US that solution requires a legislative action to amend the law. The President has tried to use an executive order recently, but that's going to likely be challenged in court if it hasn't already.
Brian Peacock wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:58 am
One state-sponsored immorality is not downgraded or offset by the immorality of another.
I never said it was. However, if I were to refrain from discussing the situation in the US (which I have discussed, and not uncritically), and only focused on the goings-on in the UK, for example, then I might well be considered rather hypocritical.
Brian Peacock wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:58 am
Nor is a right to a point of view, and to express it, dependent on, qualified, or legitimised, by anyone else's judgements as to the perceived moral rectitude of the nation in which they reside.
Oh, well, everyone has the right to any point of view they want - or they should have that right. Some here have expressed otherwise, but I think so. And, their right to it and to express it is not dependent on anything at all. I agree with you there 100%.

Brian Peacock wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:58 am
Nobody is criticising America for addressing its immigration issues - they're criticising Trump and his administration for their policy, for its operating principles and for its creul and callous implementation.
Sure, but I notice very little commentary about cruel and callous immigration policies imposed by other countries. In fact, when they're brought up, they tend to be ignored, or the discussion is diverted to suggest that it's the US issues that are under discussion, and not the other countries' issues, even on threads that relate to those other countries.
Brian Peacock wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:58 am

I think it is unhelpful to assume that somehow Trump is America, that criticising Trump is criticising America,
I agree. Trump is not America. Criticizing Trump is not the same thing as criticizing America. And Trump is imperfect. However, the criticism of Trump can be over-the-top and hyperbolic at times, to the point where it really is noticeable that whatever Trump does it's unacceptable. Recall when the "kids in cages" issue first was publicized. Pictures from 2014 were published and blamed on Trump. As soon as it was pointed out that they were from 2014, the rhetoric turned from "unacceptable abuse" to "the Obama administration was trying as hard as it could to fix the problem" (words to that effect). There is a clear double standard. And discussion hardly ever acknowledges that the Democrats want to harp on the issue, overblow it, and then refrain from doing anything about it in Congress, so that they can keep harping on President Trump.

That strategy is rather misguided though, because even among people who really don't want to see kids separated from parents, the opinion of the majority of Americans is more nuanced than a crying Rachel Maddow feigning inability to speak on the issue -- Americans understand it sucks, but they recognize that the people being detained are not showing up at ports of entry and announcing their asylum claim. They are surreptitiously crossing the Rio Grand via coyote and trying to sneak in without inspection. It's only when they get caught that they announce an asylum claim, and people get that you can't just let thousands of families into the country on their own recognizance hoping that they will return in a few months to handle their asylum claim hearing. That much should be obvious. No country just lets thousands of familys show up and walk right in, hand them a note "come back in three months" and let them into the general population. It's not reasonable to do so. And it is not fair to do that for illegal aliens with kids, but lock up the ones without kids.

To not recognize a problem - a legitimate problem to solve - is, I think, unreasonable, and I think mainly it's because the louder voices in the discussion don't care about a solution - they care about getting Trump. It's like the Bill Maher theory - give me a good solid recession! That will get rid of Trump! Sorry it will hurt, but it's more important than letting Trump be reelected.
Brian Peacock wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:58 am


The question is not about what Australia does, or what the UK is doing. It's about American policy, and claiming that non-Americans forfeit their rights to assess, judge, and criticise because their own governments are less than perfect is a red-herring, and a way of shifting the focus and the burden of justification onto others.

Both are legitimate questions. I could just as easily say that we should be talking about what Australia and the UK do, and that it's not relevant what the US does. Why not? Why is what the US does the default discussion? Can't we discuss both?

And, why aren't the same people who exoriate Trump as a Nazi considering the leaders of the UK and Oz Nazis, too? Are the immigration policies of the UK and Oz not akin to Auschwitz and Birkenau, and just like Nazi Germany? If not, then I guess it would be much better for the US just to do what Oz does - put all the immigrants on an island in what amounts to a jail, including children, and sort it out from there. No?

But even if we don't mention any other countries in discussing immigration policies of country X, we can still discuss multiple countries' immigration policies separately, can't we? How long, though, do you think conversations about Ozzie immigration practices go on without mentioning what policies are used in other countries?

And comparing countries is useful in discussions, and it's not just about moral high ground. It's about perspective. Like, if someone from North Korea started saying that the application process to get into Australia is inhumane and overly restrictive. Wouldn't the first thing an Australian would do would be to point out that hardly anyone can get into North Korea and when they do they are minded 24-7 and it's illegal to travel outside hotels unaccompanied? I mean, North Korea's policies don't render Australia's policies perfect just because North Korea's policies are awful, but wouldn't that be at least tangentially relevant to the overal discussion?
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jul 05, 2018 2:52 pm

Tero wrote:
Wed Jul 04, 2018 11:23 am
Woman, 92, killed son who tried putting her in assisted living, cops say
gets FREE assisted living in prison
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/03/ar ... s-say.html
Only in America?
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Scot Dutchy
Posts: 19000
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
About me: Dijkbeschermer
Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Scot Dutchy » Thu Jul 05, 2018 3:09 pm

Yep. Only in America.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51242
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Tero » Thu Jul 05, 2018 4:45 pm

There is no need for 92 year olds to be armed in the rest of Western workd.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Hermit » Thu Jul 05, 2018 4:48 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Thu Jul 05, 2018 2:51 pm
I notice very little commentary about cruel and callous immigration policies imposed by other countries. In fact, when they're brought up, they tend to be ignored, or the discussion is diverted to suggest that it's the US issues that are under discussion, and not the other countries' issues, even on threads that relate to those other countries.
Oh really? You have said much the same thing just a couple of weeks ago, and I have dug up nine posts I found within a minute where I posted about Australia's heinous immigration policies. Had I bothered to dig a bit deeper I would have found more, and I would have found similar posts by other Australians, had I bothered. Who exactly is ignoring what?

As it happens, we don't have any Polish or Hungarian members here whose attacks on US immigration policy would definitely be hypocritical if they did not also condemn their own government's policies somewhere along the line. Then we have Svarty and MM. They have not defended their own country's immigration policies, but can you cite them attacking those of yours? What about NineBerry? Would he even be a hypocrite if he criticised yours?

You got a fucking nerve coming up with that chain of assertions, the following of which you have failed to substantiate: "very little commentary about cruel and callous immigration policies imposed by other countries", "when they're brought up, they tend to be ignored", "or the discussion is diverted to suggest that it's the US issues that are under discussion, and not the other countries' issues, even on threads that relate to those other countries". In short, every single word of that passage is ex recto in toto.

Please stop posting such infuriating, obnoxious crap already. Or at least stop repeating such infuriating, obnoxious crap after it's been shown to be utter crap.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by laklak » Thu Jul 05, 2018 4:55 pm

Tero wrote:
Thu Jul 05, 2018 4:45 pm
There is no need for 92 year olds to be armed in the rest of Western workd.
Then how's she supposed to kill her ungrateful shithead of a son, whack him with her cane? Put ME in a fucking home? DIE, ASSHOLE!

I've told the kids that whoever puts me in a home is out of the will. They'll have to kill me and not get caught just like everybody else.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:01 pm

Look at the difference in rhetoric. Was Australia fascist? Was it operating Nazi concentration camps? Was the prime minister a Nazi or white supremacist? Were people crying and ranting about it over, and over and over and over again - a few posts discussing it. Acknowledging it. Nothing at all like this issue with the illegal immigrant detention issue in the US.

And look when I brought it up - I brought it up without reference to Trump. Part of the reason I did that was to show that people would immediately bring in the US and Trump - even though if I mention other nations' practices in a discussion of the US, the conversation is diverted into an argument over whether it matters what other countries do.

But, fair enough - there were a few mentions of the Oz situation a long time ago. Why isn't there an ongoing discussion here, about the inhumanity and human rights abuse still going on? And since it's still going on, anyone who supports the current Oz government must be a Nazi too, right? They support this illegal detention and custodial deaths going on. Horrible people. Just like how I'm responsible personally for the detentions of immigrants here, because I support Trump.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:03 pm

Tero wrote:
Thu Jul 05, 2018 4:45 pm
There is no need for 92 year olds to be armed in the rest of Western workd.
That's age discrimination, you hateful bigot!

:leave:
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Only in America

Post by Hermit » Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:16 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:01 pm
Look at the difference in rhetoric. Was Australia fascist? Was it operating Nazi concentration camps? Was the prime minister a Nazi or white supremacist? Were people crying and ranting about it over, and over and over and over again - a few posts discussing it. Acknowledging it. Nothing at all like this issue with the illegal immigrant detention issue in the US.

And look when I brought it up - I brought it up without reference to Trump. Part of the reason I did that was to show that people would immediately bring in the US and Trump - even though if I mention other nations' practices in a discussion of the US, the conversation is diverted into an argument over whether it matters what other countries do.

But, fair enough - there were a few mentions of the Oz situation a long time ago. Why isn't there an ongoing discussion here, about the inhumanity and human rights abuse still going on? And since it's still going on, anyone who supports the current Oz government must be a Nazi too, right? They support this illegal detention and custodial deaths going on. Horrible people. Just like how I'm responsible personally for the detentions of immigrants here, because I support Trump.
I can tell you that a number of our sitting members in parliament are practically indistinguishable from Nazis. There always have been such.

You probably don't remember, but a few years ago I mentioned that the brother of a girlfriend of mine was a vice-president of the NSW state branch of the Young Liberals. Playing canasta one night he went on at length describing to us what the right wing of his own party was like. Apparently only two features were missing to complete the picture: goose stepping and swastikas.

Some of those blokes are members of parliament today.

Feel free to start a thread about our Nazis and their supporters. Let's see how much pushback you get from us. Go on. Do it.
Last edited by Hermit on Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest