ANTI-IMMIGRATION PROTESTER JAILED IN LONDON JUDGE ORDERS PRESS BLACKOUT ROBINSON SILENCED!

[Scot Dutchy]

A judge can hold you in contempt for anything that happens in and around the court building. There is no requirement for any written complaint. It does not have to do with any case. The judge is lord and master. I have seen a sheriff in the Sheriff's Court in Edinburgh fining a man for litter. When the man told him to FO he was gaoled for week. When I was on duty in the High Court the judge told us that any one causing any problem just to verbally report them to him and he would deal with them. They have absolute power.

[Tyrannical]

defies the authority, justice and dignity of the court."

And many a judge has been reprimanded for over stepping their authority.

#Metoo should commemorate Tony for his work in educating and preventing rape against poor innocent non-muslim women by muslim sex criminals.

[Scot Dutchy]

WTF are you talking about? He is a fucking useless cunt.

[Rum]

defies the authority, justice and dignity of the court."

And many a judge has been reprimanded for over stepping their authority.

#Metoo should commemorate Tony for his work in educating and preventing rape against poor innocent non-muslim women by muslim sex criminals.

You utter cunt.

[Tyrannical]

WTF are you talking about? He is a fucking useless cunt.

Nobody has probably done more to prevent and educate potential young victims of the Muslim child rape epidemic in the UK then him.



Fact: The more you know, the less likely you are to get raped by Muslim child sex groomers.

[Scot Dutchy]

You really are the pits. Cunts like him have no place in civilised society. Education is the responsibility of the schools. Not some right wing mental fuckshit of a human being. But of course that flew away over your head.

[Tyrannical]

defies the authority, justice and dignity of the court."

And many a judge has been reprimanded for over stepping their authority.

#Metoo should commemorate Tony for his work in educating and preventing rape against poor innocent non-muslim women by muslim sex criminals.

You utter cunt.

Go milk yourself you udder cunt

[Rum]

You really are the pits. Cunts like him have no place in civilised society. Education is the responsibility of the schools. Not some right wing mental fuckshit of a human being. But of course that flew away over your head.

Don’t fool yourself. Nothing flew over his head. It is after all a head full of bigotry, racism and filth. He knows exactly what his hate filled words are about. He belongs in prison with his racist hero.

[Scot Dutchy]

Ok. Cunts like him is what people like May and trump depend upon.

[Tyrannical]

You really are the pits. Cunts like him have no place in civilised society. Education is the responsibility of the schools. Not some right wing mental fuckshit of a human being. But of course that flew away over your head.

The real disgusting human beings are those that allow Islamic child sex slavery. Schools, politicians, and the police are silent on it. It should be mandatory as part of sex education to warn girls of Islamic pedophiles since their 'religion' sees nothing wrong with it. Robinson is a national hero, not just of the UK but to all of Europe.

#NotMeToo

[Tyrannical]

You really are the pits. Cunts like him have no place in civilised society. Education is the responsibility of the schools. Not some right wing mental fuckshit of a human being. But of course that flew away over your head.

Don’t fool yourself. Nothing flew over his head. It is after all a head full of bigotry, racism and filth. He knows exactly what his hate filled words are about. He belongs in prison with his racist hero.

Prison.......
Still ignoring the whole sexual grooming of young girls. But since I'm 'evil', when I say it, it doesn't matter.

And I need an honest opinion on udder cunt and go moo yourself. That was pretty funny.

[Scot Dutchy]

A national hero
Nobody in Europe knows that lump of shit.

Well in this country it is part of sexual and relationship education.

[Brian Peacock]

You really are the pits. Cunts like him have no place in civilised society. Education is the responsibility of the schools. Not some right wing mental fuckshit of a human being. But of course that flew away over your head.

Think of your blood pressure mate

[Tyrannical]

You really are the pits. Cunts like him have no place in civilised society. Education is the responsibility of the schools. Not some right wing mental fuckshit of a human being. But of course that flew away over your head.

Think of your blood pressure mate

Shhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!

That's Trump's reelection plan.

[Forty Two]

Oh my, it's all so jolly confusing eh?

Wiki: "Contempt of court, often referred to simply as "contempt", is the offense of being disobedient to or discourteous toward a court of law and its officers in the form of behavior that opposes or defies the authority, justice and dignity of the court."

Lehal guidance: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/c ... s-hearings

And let's not forget the context of the case rather than addressing this as if it's a one-off incident that just happened to some random dude out of the blue one day.

It's not as simple as merely defining what contempt is. To know if a person has been disobedient to a court order, one would need to read the court order and determine if the conduct complained of was, in fact, disbedient of a court order to which the party punished was afforded actual or constructive legal notice. The judge in the Muslim rape gang case had, as I understood it, issued an order restricting publication under the Contempt law.

Also, saying "let's not forget the context..." is certainly a relevant statement. But, it tells your reader nothing, since you've not specified what you think the important context is, and why it justifies a criminal sanction.

The actus reus of common law criminal contempt is an act or omission which creates a real risk of prejudice to the administration of justice. However, it is not necessary that the proceedings are actually prejudiced, and conduct which indicates a wilful defiance of or disrespect to the court, or which challenges or affronts the authority of the court as the guardian of the rule of law will suffice. The mens rea is an intention to interfere with the administration of justice. However, following Solicitor General v Cox [2016] EWHC 1241 (QB), this intention can be inferred from the circumstances. It is sufficient proof of the necessary mens rea that the act was deliberate and either in breach of the criminal law or a court order which the person knew of. It is not necessary that the contemnor should know what the criminal law prohibits before he can be found to have committed contempt.

So, the necessary mens rea (mental state) is "deliberate" plus either a breach of the criminal law, or breach of a court order. Here, it is said he breached a court order. Thus, the express terms of the court order are important. I do not think it's alleged that he breached the criminal law in filming outside the court on the street. If I'm wrong about that, I'm happy to admit it, but the articles written by journalists are imprecise in their descriptions.

Section 4(2) empowers the court, where it appears to be necessary for avoiding a substantial risk of prejudice to the administration of justice in those proceedings, or in any other proceedings pending or imminent, to order that the publication of any report of the proceedings, or any part of the proceedings, be postponed for such period as the court thinks necessary for that purpose. This provision is aimed at postponement of publication rather than a permanent ban - R (Press Association) v Cambridge Crown Court [2012] EWCA Crim 2434. It is most likely to be appropriate where there are due to be subsequent trials of the same offence, and reporting the outcome of the first trial might prejudice the jury in the later ones e.g. in the Victoria Station murder trials.

The need for precision in formulation of orders is set out in the Practice Direction Contempt of Court Act 1981 (1983) 76 Cr App R 78 and in the Reporting Restrictions Guide.

A person is not guilty of contempt of court under the strict liability rule in respect of a fair and accurate report of legal proceedings held in public, published contemporaneously and in good faith – s.4(1). A further defence applies to publications made as or as part of a discussion in good faith of public affairs or other matters of general publication interest if the risk of impediment or prejudice is merely incidental to the discussion – s.(5).

So, section 4(2) empowers to the court to enter a publication order, but those orders can vary from case to case, and whether someone has breached such an order depends on the exact wording of the order, and the conduct complained of. A person is not guilty of contempt in respect of a fair and accurate report of a legal proceeding held in public, published contemporaneiously and in good faith.