Whether they have anything to complain about, or whether they are complaining at all, are different issues.pErvinalia wrote:Of course. But if they are paying less gross tax than previously, they have little to complain about.
Tero wrote:Fake president who makes up shit every day accuses paper of the same
https://www.salon.com/2018/04/08/trump- ... urnalists/
I have taken a position. You are just equivocating as usual. Revenue has to be measured in a standardised way year to year or it is meaningless. You'd wind up holding the nonsensical position that a 90% top tax rate from the 1950's is favourable to todays 40% (or whatever) because the rich paid less gross tax back then.Forty Two wrote:You can present any argument you want.pErvinalia wrote:Any chance you could stop being a giant baby?
Revenue obviously has to be measured in a standardised way or it's irrelevant. Even you should know this.
You can either say "revenues are falling." Or, you can say something else. You chose to say "revenues are falling," and they are not.
Now, maybe you have a good argument that if you factor in inflation of the stuff government spends money on, that the buying power of the total revenues has been reduced. That would be something for you to demonstrate, which you haven't even attempted to do. Go for it. But you haven't done it, so don't pretend later that you did. Mentioning an argument or assertion is neither an explanation nor a demonstration.
So, make whatever argument you want to make. Be a man. Take a position, and argue it, FFS, without the expectation that someone is going to do it for you or assume something you must have intended to say.
Read what I wrote. Of course not. I'm primarily concerned with the fall in total tax revenue in real terms. Your country is in staggering debt. Cutting revenue isn't a smart approach to reducing that debt load. And the biggest share of that fall in revenue is due to the rich getting a tax cut.Forty Two wrote:Whether they have anything to complain about, or whether they are complaining at all, are different issues.pErvinalia wrote:Of course. But if they are paying less gross tax than previously, they have little to complain about.
They are paying a higher "share" than before. Ergo, their share of the total is fairer than before. Are you arguing against that?
He is really a manchild. "Look at crooked Hillary Look at crooked Hillary Look at crooked Hillary She was a naughty girl".THE PRESIDENT: So I just heard that they broke into the office of one of my personal attorneys — a good man. And it’s a disgraceful situation. It’s a total witch hunt. I’ve been saying it for a long time. I’ve wanted to keep it down. We’ve given, I believe, over a million pages’ worth of documents to the Special Counsel.
They continue to just go forward. And here we are talking about Syria and we’re talking about a lot of serious things. We’re the greatest fighting force ever. And I have this witch hunt constantly going on for over 12 months now — and actually, much more than that. You could say it was right after I won the nomination, it started.
And it’s a disgrace. It’s, frankly, a real disgrace. It’s an attack on our country, in a true sense. It’s an attack on what we all stand for.
So when I saw this and when I heard it — I heard it like you did — I said, that is really now on a whole new level of unfairness.
So this has been going on — I saw one of the reporters, who is not necessarily a fan of mine, not necessarily very good to me. He said, in effect, that this is ridiculous; this is now getting ridiculous. They found no collusion whatsoever with Russia. The reason they found it is there was no collusion at all. No collusion. This is the most biased group of people. These people have the biggest conflicts of interest I’ve ever seen.
Democrats all — or just about all — either Democrats or a couple of Republicans that worked for President Obama, they’re not looking at the other side; they’re not looking at the Hillary Clinton — the horrible things that she did and all of the crimes that were committed. They’re not looking at all of the things that happened that everybody is very angry about, I can tell you, from the Republican side, and I think even the independent side. They only keep looking at us.
Maybe he did. Trump's ghostwriter?pErvinalia wrote:42 could have written that.
Stormy Daniels is the key to the entire Russia investigation. I have no doubt that the attorney-client privileged communications between Trump and Cohen will have all the proof they need to demonstrate that Trump illegally colluded with the Russians in the 2016 election campaign.Tero wrote:Trump’s penis will be the end or he may limp to end of term. Details
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hGs0Yk7Xwzs
Cohen is not going to get out of this.
Mueller firing near?
He has small hands, orange skin, and a bad comb-over, and he's fat, and he's loud, and he uses his money and power to get hot models and porn stars to suck his dick, and he's been divorced twice. He's a narcissistic, megalomaniacal, loudmouth and he exhibits aggressive toxic masculinity. He yells at his staff, and he fires a lot of people. He may even have authorized his lawyer to pay Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about their dalliances.Tero wrote:Witch hunt working splendidly! Eventually if you ever dealt with Trump (not the victims of his scams) with porn stars, TV show or Russia, you go to jail. Trump alone survives to 2019
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests