Scientific Proof Of God

[rainbow]

Now we've done the logics let's get on to the sciencey bits eh?

Wadda wadda.

An Almighty Being could not be constrained by logic, because they would not then be almighty.

[Rum]

I think compassion is the order of the day for this guy - really I do.

Dennis Markuze is the victim of an incurable neurological disorder. I actually feel sorry for him. Anything else would be akin to victim blaming.

Are you saying SU is this guy?

Perhaps we would care to confirm or deny it.

[pErvinalia]

I think Hermit did that early in the thread.

[Rum]

I think Hermit did that early in the thread.

I saw the post but I wasn't sure how he could be certain unless he knows something the rest of us don't - or I missed something.

[JimC]

Hermit knows a lot about crazy people...

[Svartalf]

but you are weaklings who have never really suffered a day in your lives...

Fuck off you moron, you don't know a thing about what other people suffer, I just wish you suffered as much as I do, and we'll see if it drives you to take your own life or not.

Then you have reached the point where you know that no human agency can help you. Only God could and would save you if He were truly sought and worked for.

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk

So all the parents with kids suffering from bone cancer, leukaemia and a thousand other deadly, painful and mortal conditions (all created by god by the way) who in their deep and ghastly despair appealed to their god to intervene and help their little ones - all of those who no doubt 'truly sought' - were refused?

That's some kind of god my deluded forum buddy.

well, part of my path on the way to atheism was realizing that the 'good god' I had had preached at me since my early chilhood days could not be good and was daily proven an evil bastard

[Hermit]

I think Hermit did that early in the thread.

I saw the post but I wasn't sure how he could be certain unless he knows something the rest of us don't - or I missed something.

Well, I am not 100% certain of anything, but I recognised the Markuze style as soon as I saw his opening post. That is why I predicted what he was going to post before he submitted his second one: "Youtube clips of Depeche Mode, quatrains from Nostradamus, page after page of pure incoherence mixed with empty (for most) threats". I was right with my predictions except for the threats. Perhaps Markuze is mindful of the fact that the probationary period of his suspended sentence for having made them in the past has not yet expired.

[Rum]

He should then perhaps be reminded by our moderators that he is currently under a legal order not to use internet forums or social media (it is easy enough to check - took me 30 seconds). We may not be able to enforce it but a note to that effect that is visible to any power that might be would be good - potentially for the forum if his behaviour gets well over the line at some point.

[Hermit]

...he is currently under a legal order not to use internet forums or social media (it is easy enough to check - took me 30 seconds).

Provide a link, please.

[Rum]

There are a few. And I agree - it is close to certain it is him. I looked at some of his writing on his own web site and it is identical in style and content.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Dennis_Ma ... te_note-28

[Rum]

Well here he seems to be at full throttle. One sick person talking to another equally deluded individual.

[Feck]

He should then perhaps be reminded by our moderators that he is currently under a legal order not to use internet forums or social media (it is easy enough to check - took me 30 seconds). We may not be able to enforce it but a note to that effect that is visible to any power that might be would be good - potentially for the forum if his behaviour gets well over the line at some point.

Can we keep him? Pweeeeeeeeeese

[Rum]

I think the mods should email the Montreal probation service and inform them of his antics here.

[Svartalf]

well, it's a proof of our obscurity that the Great Markuze only recently took an interest in us

[Brian Peacock]

Now we've done the logics let's get on to the sciencey bits eh?

Wadda wadda.

An Almighty Being could not be constrained by logic, because they would not then be almighty.

True. A truly almighty being would surpass all others in their capacities and capabilities. Their logic would be the most logical logic possible, and their illogic the most illogical; they would be the most intelligent being possible, and also the most stupid being imaginable; their capacity for perfect kindness would be matched only by their abject cruelty. However, the little sillygism above doesn't appeal to the necessity of an almighty super agent acting logically, but whether they can fulfil the declared requirements of being all-knowing, all-loving, and all-powerful. If the logic of that cannot be applied to such an entity then the rational need for scientific proof can easily be made to fail on similar grounds - and we are left with nothing but the twin edifices of Faith and Tradition to mitigate all claims for a controlling and interested supernatural uberbeing.