Straya!

[pErvinalia]

I'd link the post, but we both know you saw what I wrote and instead of attempting a rebuttal just went for silly rhetoric. So be it.

[Hermit]

I'd link the post, but we both know you saw what I wrote and instead of attempting a rebuttal just went for silly rhetoric. So be it.

Honestly, I could not find a post wherein you allege to have given "two cases where that is so". The only name you mentioned in the past two pages is "Jesus Christ", and there was no associated link with his dual citizenship and embarrassing information about him at all.

[pErvinalia]

Ok.

[JimC]

We don't delete posts...

[Hermit]

We don't delete posts...

That's what you want us to believe.

Go on, Jim, just say you deleted pErv's post. It'll save him the embarrassment of having to admit he never cited any evidence proving that due to holding dual citizenship there's a greater chance that "they may hold embarrassing information about you, they may be in a position to allow or deny a family member citizenship/asylum", whatever that garblish means.

[JimC]

Let's face it. We are all citizens of some country or another, but the most important citizenship we have is to Ratz!

[NineBerry]

Rationalia First!

[pErvinalia]

We don't delete posts...

That's what you want us to believe.

Go on, Jim, just say you deleted pErv's post. It'll save him the embarrassment of having to admit he never cited any evidence proving that due to holding dual citizenship there's a greater chance that "they may hold embarrassing information about you, they may be in a position to allow or deny a family member citizenship/asylum", whatever that garblish means.

So I see you've changed your stance from "I didn't see nuffink", to now "What I saw wasn't evidence", despite you not mentioning evidence before this point. You're doing well, Hermit. Keep it up.

[NineBerry]

Freedom is Slavery.

[Hermit]

So I see you've changed your stance from "I didn't see nuffink", to now "What I saw wasn't evidence", despite you not mentioning evidence before this point. You're doing well, Hermit. Keep it up.

You're "seeing things". My stance now is the same it was in the first place, when I replied to you here like this: "The question was whether politicians are more vulnerable to being blackmailed using embarrassing information about them on account of their dual citizenship, than those who only hold the Australian one. You did not address that point at all. There is nothing in the least idiotic about Brian's post." Don't believe me? Quick, click on it before Jimbo makes that post disappear too.

[pErvinalia]

You said I didn't address the point. Then in a subsequent post you explicitly mentioned my points addressing it.

[Scot Dutchy]

Freedom is Slavery.

Very 1984, duckie.

[Hermit]

You said I didn't address the point.

Correct. The point was that you didn't provide evidence for politicians being more vulnerable to being blackmailed using embarrassing information about them on account of their dual citizenship, than those who only hold the Australian one.

Then in a subsequent post you explicitly mentioned my points addressing it.

Your subsequent post did not address them. You only think it did. Go on, blame your depression. Or the meds you take to deal with it. Meds do have some unexpected side effects, so that excuse will give you an out.

[Brian Peacock]

--- deleted ---

[pErvinalia]

You said I didn't address the point.

Correct. The point was that you didn't provide evidence

There you go again moving the goalposts. I wasn't asked to provide evidence. I was asked to provide a scenario. Which I did.

Then in a subsequent post you explicitly mentioned my points addressing it.

Your subsequent post did not address them.

How about you stop digging and try and read for comprehension? I said YOUR subsequent post. I'm talking about you directly contradicting yourself.