Hermit wrote:As for Septimius Severus, I did not describe him as a negroid. You, however, wrote about "Northern Africans [who] were a vassal subject peoples to Rome", and Septimius Severus's heritage was of both. He certainly was not of Roman stock. Generally you would have discovered, had you studied ancient Roman history even just in passing, that is, that people from the conquered provinces were increasingly integrated over time into even the upper strata of Roman society and administration.
As for "naval gazing" I doubt that Mike Stuchbery spent a great deal of time looking at military equipment of the floating kind, and calling him a nincompoop is not exactly the most convincing riposte I have read against his, or anyone else's argument either. Similarly, it would have served you better to find something substantial, If you can, that refutes the evidence dug up in York and elsewhere than to label Hella Eckardt as a disinfo agent. I provided a link to the evidence in my previous post, and I am fairly sure I know why you ignored its substance.
Infact, Septimius Severus was from a wealthy family, very much of European stock. His mother was Roman, his father was Punic, which is basically Phoenician or 'Lebanese'.
As I stated before, North Africa was more Caucasian then than it is now. It became more Semitic with the Arab invasions from 642AD onwards. Previous to that it had a large percentage of Greek, 'Italian', Hispanic, and 'Lebanese' extraction. The Eastern Mediterraneans at that time were also more European than they are now.
As I have already said, the enforced cultural diversity that we have now was not in play at that time. Peoples mixed gradually over time due to trade and slow cultural exchange. Rapid change only occurred with conquest, such as the previous invasions of N. Africa by Europeans (that displaced the Moors) and the later Arab invasions (that displaced the Europeans).
There was no love lost between the original N. Africans, mainly Moors, and the invading Greeks & Romans who stole the Moors' lands. So this rosy idea that you seem to have of a lovey-dubby, non-racist culture around the periphery of the Mediterranean is irrational.
However, having studied 'philosophy' you would know better. Stay on track baba, stay on track...
rainbow wrote:Families who have lived in the English-Scottish Borders for generations could be descended from African soldiers who patrolled Hadrian's Wall nearly 2,000 years ago.
Archaeologists say there is compelling evidence that a 500-strong unit of Moors manned a fort near Carlisle in the third century AD.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... icans.html
There is some Spanish influence on coastal North & West of Scotland & Ireland due to the Armada survivors, and in Holland since it was a Spanish colony. But no Moorish influence in Scotland worth mentioning.
Archaeologists hold their jobs according to their contributions. If there is no valid contribution to make, then make a bogus one. Any old rubbish will do, since pulp purveyors, such as The Telegraph, also need gee-wiz! type propaganda to sell more copies.
People are always too ready to accept the wishful thinking scenario rather than the cold hard truth.
In all my travels & living in Scotland I never saw any Moorish looking people. If there was a significant Moorish military unit near Hadrian's Wall (which is unlikely) they would have been called back as the Romans withdrew from Britain.
