I want Emerald green for my name.AshtonBlack wrote:"There's Basic Black then there's Ashton Black. Oh yeah baby!" - To be said by Samuel L. Jackson in the film I dream of making.JimC wrote:Some of us are proud of our basic black...Calilasseia wrote:Ah, this'll be the "rainbow colours" referred to in one of the other threads (I think Charlou posted something about this). These are assigned randomly, or is there a chromatic pecking order, as it were, such that one colour signifies a minor attention seeker, whilst another colour signifies someone to whom Warren Beatty's quip about Madonna applies?
(For those who didn't see this, after the filming of Dick Tracy, Warren Beatty uttered the following words about Madonna: "What's the point of talking off-camera? She doesn't live off-camera, much less talk".)
Let's take a look at this shall we?
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Any shades of red or green may cause confusion with staff, so we're avoiding those colors. Sowwy.Animavore wrote:I want Emerald green for my name.AshtonBlack wrote:"There's Basic Black then there's Ashton Black. Oh yeah baby!" - To be said by Samuel L. Jackson in the film I dream of making.JimC wrote:Some of us are proud of our basic black...Calilasseia wrote:Ah, this'll be the "rainbow colours" referred to in one of the other threads (I think Charlou posted something about this). These are assigned randomly, or is there a chromatic pecking order, as it were, such that one colour signifies a minor attention seeker, whilst another colour signifies someone to whom Warren Beatty's quip about Madonna applies?
(For those who didn't see this, after the filming of Dick Tracy, Warren Beatty uttered the following words about Madonna: "What's the point of talking off-camera? She doesn't live off-camera, much less talk".)
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Well then I want white.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Whatever.Animavore wrote:Well then I want white.

Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Yay. I was black but, now I'm white. Like MJ.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Animavore wrote:Yay. I was black but, now I'm white. Like MJ.

- lordpasternack
- Divine Knob Twiddler
- Posts: 6459
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
- About me: I have remarkable elbows.
- Contact:
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
What?! Does this mean we can no longer egosearch, or search active topics, or stalk watch specific posters? Oh - I am going to have a hissy fit!Calilasseia wrote:Bugger. Finding this thread is taking longer than I thought. Because as part of the measures to save hits on the database, the forum search facility at RDF has been replaced with a Google search. Which is nowhere near as specific (I can't limit searches to particular forum subsections or particular authors anymore), and sometimes leads me on a wild goose chase.

Edit: http://www.richarddawkins.net/forum/vie ... 7#p2161627
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Could I get this color, please?
#2A52BE
Or this!
#007BA7
If that is too close to admin, how about this?
#1DACD6
I honestly have no idea if this is how you do colors at all for names...
Edit: In order of preference, and much obliged.
#2A52BE
Or this!
#007BA7
If that is too close to admin, how about this?
#1DACD6
I honestly have no idea if this is how you do colors at all for names...
Edit: In order of preference, and much obliged.
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
I should also mention, and consequently get back to the point of the thread, that I did indeed begin reading the Moon Landing Woo that you were mentioning Cal. Can something be so terrible that it actually elicits a pain response, simply by reading it? I'm feeling so many emotions...denial, then rage, then more denial, then more rage, then depression, then pity, then sadness...this thread...I want to un-read it.
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Okay...my opinion on the Moon Landing Woo has completely changed. At first I wanted to claw my eyes out. Now, I think this is the best thread I've ever seen. I'm only 5 pages in, and it seemed that the story was starting to dry up...but then boom! JFK was murdered to prevent him spilling the beans on the Moon Landing Hoax...and the Illuminati...and the End of Days. Great Troll or Greatest Troll?
This is so good...it must be fattening.
This is so good...it must be fattening.

- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
I'll get on this one in a few minutes.RPizzle wrote: If that is too close to admin, how about this?
#1DACD6
- Calilasseia
- Butterfly
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
- About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
- Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
- Contact:
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Actually, the consensus of opinion with respect to that tosser is that he's a deranged tool. He's basically unloaded his soiled intellectual nappies all over that thread, and given us a trifecta into the bargain. He's actually competing with Robert Byers with respect to the business of making up whatever shit tickles his erogenous zones, again applying the principle of "make up whatever shit is momentarily apologetically convenient, regardless of whether it's consistent with the previous made up shit", though he's slightly better on the literacy front (not that this is difficult - my tropical fish are probably more literate than Byers for fuck's sake).RPizzle wrote:Okay...my opinion on the Moon Landing Woo has completely changed. At first I wanted to claw my eyes out. Now, I think this is the best thread I've ever seen. I'm only 5 pages in, and it seemed that the story was starting to dry up...but then boom! JFK was murdered to prevent him spilling the beans on the Moon Landing Hoax...and the Illuminati...and the End of Days. Great Troll or Greatest Troll?
This is so good...it must be fattening.
However, apart from the fact that I've thrown peer reviewed scientific papers at him, only to have them bounce off his fucking tinfoil hat, the clincher for me was when he tried to claim that the Russians were somehow "duped" by NASA. What a total fucktard. He wants us all to believe that a rival nuclear superpower with its own manned spaceflight technology was somehow "duped" by a Capricorn One style hoax? A rival nuclear superpower that moreover, was at the time an implacable ideological enemy of the USA, and which would have capitalised ruthlessly upon exposing such a hoax? A rival nuclear superpower that, in addition, funded lavishly one of the world's largest military intelligence arms, equipped with its own spy satellites and thousands of spies on the ground, which at the time was headed by none other than arch-manipulator and arch-hardman Yuri Andropov, the man who organised the ruthless suppression of dissent in Hungary and Czechoslovakia? If he thinks this shit is anything other than beneath deserving of a point of view, then he has lime jelly inside his cranium where the rest of us have brain cells.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Cali, my first ship, USS MacDonough, DLG-8, babysat a Soviet trawler that was hovering off the coast of Florida whenever the Apollos took off. (I missed that fun, but got to see the pictures later on.) I guess they fooled damn near everybody is the Sovs wasted a spyboat on that huge hoad.Calilasseia wrote:However, apart from the fact that I've thrown peer reviewed scientific papers at him, only to have them bounce off his fucking tinfoil hat, the clincher for me was when he tried to claim that the Russians were somehow "duped" by NASA.

Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
I'm totally caught up on that thread now. It just didn't stop. I don't understand how all that evidence seemed to simply brush past him. He basically ignored everything, or responded in some cookie cutter fashion. Honestly, if I hear about the undeniablility of the hoax one more time, I will rage. I feel for you, subjecting yourself to that nonsense. Also, who seriously considers sites who have that damn 'space' background from the early 90's? I've made better looking websites as a 13 year old using only HTML. Oh well, crappy websites must be good cover for the Illuminati...Calilasseia wrote:Actually, the consensus of opinion with respect to that tosser is that he's a deranged tool. He's basically unloaded his soiled intellectual nappies all over that thread, and given us a trifecta into the bargain. He's actually competing with Robert Byers with respect to the business of making up whatever shit tickles his erogenous zones, again applying the principle of "make up whatever shit is momentarily apologetically convenient, regardless of whether it's consistent with the previous made up shit", though he's slightly better on the literacy front (not that this is difficult - my tropical fish are probably more literate than Byers for fuck's sake).RPizzle wrote:Okay...my opinion on the Moon Landing Woo has completely changed. At first I wanted to claw my eyes out. Now, I think this is the best thread I've ever seen. I'm only 5 pages in, and it seemed that the story was starting to dry up...but then boom! JFK was murdered to prevent him spilling the beans on the Moon Landing Hoax...and the Illuminati...and the End of Days. Great Troll or Greatest Troll?
This is so good...it must be fattening.
However, apart from the fact that I've thrown peer reviewed scientific papers at him, only to have them bounce off his fucking tinfoil hat, the clincher for me was when he tried to claim that the Russians were somehow "duped" by NASA. What a total fucktard. He wants us all to believe that a rival nuclear superpower with its own manned spaceflight technology was somehow "duped" by a Capricorn One style hoax? A rival nuclear superpower that moreover, was at the time an implacable ideological enemy of the USA, and which would have capitalised ruthlessly upon exposing such a hoax? A rival nuclear superpower that, in addition, funded lavishly one of the world's largest military intelligence arms, equipped with its own spy satellites and thousands of spies on the ground, which at the time was headed by none other than arch-manipulator and arch-hardman Yuri Andropov, the man who organised the ruthless suppression of dissent in Hungary and Czechoslovakia? If he thinks this shit is anything other than beneath deserving of a point of view, then he has lime jelly inside his cranium where the rest of us have brain cells.
I do wish that I had something to contribute, as I envy your ability to throw down huge amounts of knowledge at a moments notice. If you don't mind my asking, how long have you been in the scientific field? I fancy myself a fairly adept university student, but you wield science with such deftness and grace that it is both intimidating and inspiring. Even within my concentration area (4th year biology/pre-medicine) you seem to be at a level that I can't even resolve. Sorry if I sound like a fan boy, but I do have that Carl Sagan esque love of science. Who needs art?
- Calilasseia
- Butterfly
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
- About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
- Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
- Contact:
Re: Let's take a look at this shall we?
Is this the ship in question 'Zilla?
Only I had trouble finding it using the reference DLG-8 - I found it eventually as DDG-39.
Only I had trouble finding it using the reference DLG-8 - I found it eventually as DDG-39.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests