Your use of a smilie says more than facts and evidence could ever convey, here's my rebuttal.pErvin wrote:
The Hillary-thread
- DaveDodo007
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
- About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51910
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
The tax just goes to consumers. The dollar store goes to $1.35 store.DaveDodo007 wrote:Yes they are unless the owners want to pay 35% tariff rates.Tero wrote:They beed to move on. The factories are never coming back.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41221
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
I just love that imagery.Scot Dutchy wrote:Where do they think the jobs are coming from? They were turkeys voting for xmas.Tero wrote:They beed to move on. The factories are never coming back.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41221
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
Actually, the owner can afford not to do business in the US at all, and in all likelihood, doing the work in China or India likely is worth more to them than the 35% tariff to sell their goods in the usa... odds are they save more that way than by building new factories there all over again.DaveDodo007 wrote:Yes they are unless the owners want to pay 35% tariff rates.Tero wrote:They beed to move on. The factories are never coming back.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Forty Two
- Posts: 14978
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
- About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
- Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
Too many, which is why work needs to be done now. China also owns too many of American industrial parts suppliers, and other formerly American industrial entities. This is a real problem.Scot Dutchy wrote:Do you know how many American Government bonds China owns? Dont shout too loud.DaveDodo007 wrote:You might want to look in the mirror, what does the USA have to lose by high tariffs and looking after it's own citizens first. I mean fucking over China will be such a negative for them.Scot Dutchy wrote:Talk about being removed from reality.
At this point, there is still time, perhaps, to take measures to alleviate the fall, or to change direction at least to some extent. If the situation suggests that now there should be care taken as to how loud one shouts, it is only headed in a worse direction (for the US). As China's military development continues, it will gain on the US. Right now, the US matches or exceeds the combined might of China and Russia, depending on how you look at it. Our navy alone, without reference to American allies, is larger than Russia and China's combined. But, it takes years and decades to change course when you're talking about economies as large as the US, China and Russia. It would be folly to wait until 10 or 20 years from now and then say "hey, wait a minute..." Action must be taken when action can be assuredly taken. On the course we're heading, it doesn't get any more assured down the line...
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
- Forty Two
- Posts: 14978
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
- About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
- Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
Wait....who's against globalism now? The left or the right? It's the right now? The right is against globalism. The right has always been against globalism.Brian Peacock wrote:I live in a nation. Nationalism is a fact. Nations exist within a wider global environment. Globalism is necessary if you want to eat at pizza in front of the telly while texting your mates about how fucking shit globalism is and how it should be overthrown. People like that don't think these things through - it's all "Me! Me! Me!" with them. Were do they think there resources come from? Magic? Extruded out of the arse of a nationalist? Trump said that the US should have just taken Iraq's oil. Iraq lost - the US pwnd them, therefore "All your stuff belong to us now." Is that a good solution to anything? Think that through ffs.
But... up until a few weeks ago, the left was against globalism.
Another example, Winston.
A serious delusion.
The left likes globalization. The left has always supported globalization. The anti-globalization protesters have always been right wingers.
Last edited by Forty Two on Mon Nov 14, 2016 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51910
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
Who's.
Who's is short for who is.
You didn't know lawyers and now you don't master grammar either.
Who's is short for who is.
You didn't know lawyers and now you don't master grammar either.
- Forty Two
- Posts: 14978
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
- About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
- Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
Huffpo is wrong, she did not "win the popular vote." She won the votes which had by that time been counted, and only by a slight margin.Tero wrote:Huff postHillary Clinton not only won the popular vote in Tuesday’s election. It is now clear that she won it by a margin larger than two candidates who went on to win the presidency.
David Leonhardt, a columnist for The New York Times, noted on Friday that with a 1.7-percentage-point popular vote lead over Donald Trump,Clinton will have a larger margin of victory than Richard Nixon had over Hubert Humphrey in 1968 or John F. Kennedy had over Nixon in 1960. (Her edge is also larger than Al Gore’s popular vote victory over George W. Bush in 2000, though he too was stymied by an electoral college loss.)
In raw numbers, that amounts to an edge of roughly 1.8 million votes as of Saturday.
One major source of votes cast, but uncounted, are write in votes. States count write-in votes (mailed in ballots) from military people and such only when the difference between the regularly cast ballots are close enough that it can make a difference. So, in most states in which Trump was the winner, they didn't count the mail in ballots because there were not enough mail in ballots to change the outcome. However, mail in ballots are generally expected to tilt Trump about 3 to 1. so, if you really wanted to know who won the "popular vote" you'd have to require all the votes to be counted. It's likely that if you counted all the write in votes, you'd have Trump well in the lead. Even in California, which tilts 3-1 Democrat, the write in votes are 3 to 1 Trump. And, there are many hundreds of thousands of write in votes in CA which were left uncounted. He wouldn't have made up the difference in California per se, but he would have made up the 150,000 or so difference between him and Clinton nationally.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
- Forty Two
- Posts: 14978
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
- About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
- Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
The single word "Canada" is not a proper sentence.Tero wrote:Nice place to visit. Canada. We drove the Transcanada in bits, Newfoundland to Alberta, then bits of BC. The prairie made me sleepy at the wheel.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
- Forty Two
- Posts: 14978
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
- About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
- Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
"Beed" is not a word.Tero wrote:They beed to move on. The factories are never coming back.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51910
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
Typo. We don't count typos on smart phones, adshole.
- Forty Two
- Posts: 14978
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
- About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
- Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
Oh, sure, your mistakes are totally understandable and reasonable.Tero wrote:Typo. We don't count typos on smart phones, adshole.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51910
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
Absolutely. I had to learn grammar in 2 foreign languages. The better one I've been using for 50 years. I got a B in English my first semester in America (where I have paid taxes for 40 years). The second semester and then all through high school I got As.
For your education, more on plurals:
http://english.stackexchange.com/questi ... ter-grades
For your education, more on plurals:
http://english.stackexchange.com/questi ... ter-grades
- Forty Two
- Posts: 14978
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
- About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
- Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
I speak 2 languages fluently, and enough Spanish and Norwegian to get by.Tero wrote:Absolutely. I had to learn grammar in 2 foreign languages. The better one I've been using for 50 years. I got a B in English my first semester in America (where I have paid taxes for 40 years). The second semester and then all through high school I got As.
For your education, more on plurals:
http://english.stackexchange.com/questi ... ter-grades
Here, this will help you with your spelling deficiencies: https://www.amazon.com/Teaching-Kids-Sp ... 0764576240
This book will help you with your grammar issues: https://play.google.com/store/books/det ... &gclsrc=ds
It's just a coincidence that the titles appear to be directed specifically to you.

“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51910
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 8-34-20
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: The Hillary-thread
Gp fuvk yoyrselvrs.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests