Time, CBS New York, Slate, Fox 5, WCPO Cinicinnati, ABC News Nashville, polls had Trump winning the debate - CNN showed Clinton winning -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... slide.html
LESTER HOLT: THE THIRD DEBATER...
Asked Trump 6 follow-up questions, did not ask ANY of Clinton...
Interrupted Trump 41 times, Clinton 7.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/27/holt- ... in-debate/
the "fact checking" became opinion journalism -
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... -opinion-/ (eight examples where the media claimed to "fact check" when in fact they just came up with a different view on debatable points or ignored the point of a statement).
Add to that the total and complete HORSESHIT from the moderator last night about "stop and frisk" - and the media has eaten it up whole cloth, claiming Trump was wrong about the constitutionality of stop and frisk. He wasn't what he said about it was absolutely correct, and the media has it wrong.
A district judge (trial court) did indeed find that stop and frisk as NYC was doing it was unconstitutional and had to be modified. HOWEVER, that decision was "stayed" by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which means that it was held in abeyance, and was not an effective opinion. The trial judge was removed from the case by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals found that the trial judge committed ethical violations in her conduct of the case and was biased against the police/city (exactly what Trump said). The appeal was never completed, however, because the new mayor, Bill DeBlasio, just settled with the Plaintiffs and discontinued the stop and frisk practice. The stay of the district court's order was never lifted and the case was never decided. New York City's stop and frisk policy was NEVER found unconstitutional by a binding court decision -- even if the disctrict judge's decision was not "stayed", it would ONLY be binding in her court. It wouldn't even be binding on other judges in her district. It's just one district judge's ruling, and other district judges might rule the exact opposite in the same circumstances. But, that doesn't stop the media from declaring Trump to be wrong.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
