GOP Primaries/Caucuses Discussions, Jokes and Predictions

[Svartalf]

why should his winning influence European politics to that extent?

[Tyrannical]

why should his winning influence European politics to that extent?

It'll make nationalism more acceptable in public and the press. It'll certainly embolden the anti islam voice of those parties. And the anti globalism debate.

[pErvinalia]

Scot is almost by definition a cuck, given he is 80% woman-man.

Look I dont even know what a cuck is. You either have long memory or my gender mix intrigued you but I am still the same.

I remember it because of the hissy fit you chucked when people mentioned it with incredulity.

By the way, I don't know what a cuck is either. It's something "liberal" feminist haters bandy about as some sort of insult. Unfortunately we've got a couple of these "liberals" who post here almost exclusively about how the left is ruining the(ir) world.

[Svartalf]

Scot is almost by definition a cuck, given he is 80% woman-man.

Look I dont even know what a cuck is. You either have long memory or my gender mix intrigued you but I am still the same.

I remember it because of the hissy fit you chucked when people mentioned it with incredulity.

By the way, I don't know what a cuck is either. It's something "liberal" feminist haters bandy about as some sort of insult. Unfortunately we've got a couple of these "liberals" who post here almost exclusively about how the left is ruining the(ir) world.

liberal feminist haters? iss that haters who are libaral faminists or haters of libaral faminists ?

[pErvinalia]

I noticed the possible confusion after I posted, but couldn't be bothered fixing it. I let youse choose which one works..

[Svartalf]

both, of course

[Scot Dutchy]

I remember it because of the hissy fit you chucked when people mentioned it with incredulity.

You have a better memory than me and it is such a long time ago. Given up on explanations now so I could not care a fuck really.

[Forty Two]

You just don't get it, do you? The same "logic" applies to Hitler.

Only if you ignore the facts. But, go ahead and write out the logical argument involving Hitler instead of Trump. Is your argument that it was that all the wrong and untrustworthy people were opposing Hitler all along, and Hitler was advancing a popular message that was garnering him overwhelming support at the ballot box?

ffs. Debating with you is like trying to have an intelligent conversation with a tortoise. Your logic is that Trump must be alright as the mainstream dislikes him. The same can apply to Hitler, Marie Le Pen, or the loud-mouthed drunk down at your local bar. It's fucking idiotic "logic", as can be seen by substituting in other people who the political mainstream dislike.

I already explained to you that my logic is NOT that "Trump must be alright." None of them are alright, including Trump. He's just better than the alternatives in the offing.

I never said "Trump is alright because the "mainstream" dislike him." I said it's a point in his favor that the conservative, ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS hate him and are threatened by him, and that the leftist progressives are having a hissy fit about him.

God, can you ever stop mischaracterizing what people say?

[piscator]

I already explained to you that my logic is NOT that "Trump must be alright." None of them are alright, including Trump. He's just better than the alternatives in the offing.

[pErvinalia]

You just don't get it, do you? The same "logic" applies to Hitler.

Only if you ignore the facts. But, go ahead and write out the logical argument involving Hitler instead of Trump. Is your argument that it was that all the wrong and untrustworthy people were opposing Hitler all along, and Hitler was advancing a popular message that was garnering him overwhelming support at the ballot box?

ffs. Debating with you is like trying to have an intelligent conversation with a tortoise. Your logic is that Trump must be alright as the mainstream dislikes him. The same can apply to Hitler, Marie Le Pen, or the loud-mouthed drunk down at your local bar. It's fucking idiotic "logic", as can be seen by substituting in other people who the political mainstream dislike.

I already explained to you that my logic is NOT that "Trump must be alright." None of them are alright, including Trump. He's just better than the alternatives in the offing.

I never said "Trump is alright because the "mainstream" dislike him." I said it's a point in his favor that the conservative, ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS hate him and are threatened by him, and that the leftist progressives are having a hissy fit about him.

God, can you ever stop mischaracterizing what people say?

Stop lying. You said "the great thing about Trump is" and "we know he is on the right track".

Can't wait for your next post explaining how black is white..

[pErvinalia]

And to be clear, by mainstream I of course mean the establishment, as my earlier replies to you make perfectly clear.

[Forty Two]

You just don't get it, do you? The same "logic" applies to Hitler.

Only if you ignore the facts. But, go ahead and write out the logical argument involving Hitler instead of Trump. Is your argument that it was that all the wrong and untrustworthy people were opposing Hitler all along, and Hitler was advancing a popular message that was garnering him overwhelming support at the ballot box?

ffs. Debating with you is like trying to have an intelligent conversation with a tortoise. Your logic is that Trump must be alright as the mainstream dislikes him. The same can apply to Hitler, Marie Le Pen, or the loud-mouthed drunk down at your local bar. It's fucking idiotic "logic", as can be seen by substituting in other people who the political mainstream dislike.

I already explained to you that my logic is NOT that "Trump must be alright." None of them are alright, including Trump. He's just better than the alternatives in the offing.

I never said "Trump is alright because the "mainstream" dislike him." I said it's a point in his favor that the conservative, ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS hate him and are threatened by him, and that the leftist progressives are having a hissy fit about him.

God, can you ever stop mischaracterizing what people say?

Stop lying. You said "the great thing about Trump is" and "we know he is on the right track".

Can't wait for your next post explaining how black is white..

Exactly - when you piss off the right people, you're doing a good/great thing, and it's an indication of being on the right track. It's like when racists are pissed off at what you're doing.

You're a piece of work, rEvolutionist. You squirm and twist and fabricate. You love to strawman people, and simply distort what they say. But, it doesn't work anymore. Everyone smells your bullshit.

[piscator]

[JimC]

A friend of my wife just came back from the US. She was astounded by the number of people she met who thought Trump was an arsehole, but intended to vote for him in preference to Clinton, basically because they see her of more of the same...

[piscator]

"Those AM radio hosts would never hurl an accusation or level a charge that wasn't completely true. That's why we have to vote for The Donald. He's honest."