Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post Reply
User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by Forty Two » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:17 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:[

Nah, I'm over you. You either can't debate honestly, or there's some real malfunction going on upstairs. Hermit has explained well to you link between SA and international terrorism, despite you apparently not even knowing there was a link. :roll: SA is one of the most repressive theocracies in the world. Saddam was equivalent to a lot of the other dictatorships the US has allied itself with in the region and world. This is simple stuff. To everyone but you, unfortunately.

Soooooo Ratskep.... lol.

That gave me a great laugh.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60777
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by pErvinalia » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:19 pm

About that lie you made earlier? :ask:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by Forty Two » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:57 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:About that lie you made earlier? :ask:
Again... soooo Ratskep. Joke. :hilarious:
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by mistermack » Tue Jan 05, 2016 6:10 pm

laklak wrote:Did science ever decide anything about room temperature superconductors?
If you can make room temperature superconductors, you're in for a Nobel Prize, and billions and billions of dollarpounds.
I hope it goes well for them.
As far as I can remember, the warmest that the current ones will work at, is 77 degrees over absolute zero. Or minus 196 Celsius. Room temperature would be a big jump.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by Seth » Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:47 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:
Forty Two wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:The US should have invaded Saudi Arabia
On what basis?

Saudi Arabia never attacked the US.
There was no UN resolution or permission to attack Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia has no WMD.
Iraq never attacked the US.
Iraq invaded Kuwait, an ally of ours with whom we had a defense treaty.
There was no UN resolution or permission to attack Iraq.
A UN resolution is not required for the US to come to the defense of its allies. Never has been. Never will be.
Iraq had no WMD.
Iraq most certainly DID have WMDs, thousands upon thousands of artillery shells and bombs loaded with Sarin, among other things (which are now, or were until recently in Syria, transported there just prior to the 2nd Gulf War. Just ask the Kurds who were gassed using those WMDS in the 1980s, or the Iranians.

And, Saddam went to great pains to convince the rest of the world that he DID have both nuke and biological WMD programs in operation. It turned out to be a bluff, but it was a good one and got his neck stretched eventually. You don't go to war with perfect intelligence, you go to war with the intelligence you have, which all of the Coalition leaders agreed was compelling enough to restart hostilities because Saddam was refusing to honor the conditions of the cease-fire agreement he signed after we kicked his ass out of Kuwait.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by Seth » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:00 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:
Nah, I'm over you. You either can't debate honestly, or there's some real malfunction going on upstairs. Hermit has explained well to you link between SA and international terrorism, despite you apparently not even knowing there was a link. :roll: SA is one of the most repressive theocracies in the world. Saddam was equivalent to a lot of the other dictatorships the US has allied itself with in the region and world. This is simple stuff. To everyone but you, unfortunately.
The US does not have a mandate to take down "repressive theocracies" sua sponte. However "repressive" SA may be, it's not our business to go nation-building over there. If the people of SA want to rise up against the repressive regime and ask for our assistance, we may be persuaded to assist them if doing so is in our national interests. Or not.

The US did, however, have a defense treaty with Kuwait that obligated it to come to Kuwait's aid when Saddam invaded, and it had a mandate to reopen hostilities after 12 years and 14 distinct violations of the cease fire agreement and UN declarations under which we allowed Saddam to stay in power.

You see, we left him in power the first time precisely in order to try to avoid the inevitable chaos and Islamic takeover of Iraq that eventually occurred. But, at the time Saddam didn't give us, or the rest of the Coalition, which included the UK and, as I recall, Australia, much of a choice when he defied the cease-fire agreement so we had to take him out. Unfortunately that allowed the Muslims to do what they have done and now we have to deal with them, but that's just how international geopolitics goes some times.

Germany was an ally, then an enemy, then an ally, then an enemy and once again an ally.

Things change. Shit happens. You go with the flow and roll with the punches and deal today with what must be dealt with today and leave tomorrow to tomorrow sometimes. It ain't ideal, but it's how the world actually works.

If the House of Saud becomes an open and notorious supporter of Islamic terrorism or threatens to nuke us we'll have to deal with that when it comes up. Until then, we, like everybody else, need the oil so we hold our noses and let the Saudis run Saudi Arabia as they please because it's their country. If the Saudi people want change it's up to them to change things.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by Seth » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:01 pm

laklak wrote:Did science ever decide anything about room temperature superconductors?
Yes, they are not nearly as pervasive in the universe as room-temperature IQs.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39983
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by Brian Peacock » Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:32 pm

Seth wrote:The US does not have a mandate to take down "repressive theocracies" sua sponte. However "repressive" SA may be, it's not our business to go nation-building over there. If the people of SA want to rise up against the repressive regime and ask for our assistance, we may be persuaded to assist them if doing so is in our national interests. Or not.
But in the meantime the US, along with the UK and other 'Western Powers' are quite happy sell the Saudi's the means to suppress popular uprisings. If it comes to choosing between arms deals and supporting an oppressed population which side do you think the US is going to come down on?

U.S. approves $1.29 billion sale of smart bombs to Saudi Arabia (Reuturs, 15 Nov 2015).
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by laklak » Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:13 am

Well, if we were all dead that would certainly solve the income inequality issue.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
piscator
Posts: 4725
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:11 am
Location: The Big BSOD
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by piscator » Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:33 am

Brian Peacock wrote:
Seth wrote:The US does not have a mandate to take down "repressive theocracies" sua sponte. However "repressive" SA may be, it's not our business to go nation-building over there. If the people of SA want to rise up against the repressive regime and ask for our assistance, we may be persuaded to assist them if doing so is in our national interests. Or not.
But in the meantime the US, along with the UK and other 'Western Powers' are quite happy sell the Saudi's the means to suppress popular uprisings. If it comes to choosing between arms deals and supporting an oppressed population which side do you think the US is going to come down on?

U.S. approves $1.29 billion sale of smart bombs to Saudi Arabia (Reuturs, 15 Nov 2015).


Who do you have in mind to morally run SA after your boycotts and shaming letters force the House of Saud to remorsefully abdicate and turn themselves over to the World Court?

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by Seth » Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:51 am

piscator wrote:
Brian Peacock wrote:
Seth wrote:The US does not have a mandate to take down "repressive theocracies" sua sponte. However "repressive" SA may be, it's not our business to go nation-building over there. If the people of SA want to rise up against the repressive regime and ask for our assistance, we may be persuaded to assist them if doing so is in our national interests. Or not.
But in the meantime the US, along with the UK and other 'Western Powers' are quite happy sell the Saudi's the means to suppress popular uprisings. If it comes to choosing between arms deals and supporting an oppressed population which side do you think the US is going to come down on?

U.S. approves $1.29 billion sale of smart bombs to Saudi Arabia (Reuturs, 15 Nov 2015).


Who do you have in mind to morally run SA after your boycotts and shaming letters force the House of Saud to remorsefully abdicate and turn themselves over to the World Court?
The Whabbi fundamentalists like the ones in Iran of course. rEv bitches about our taking down Saddam, who he says was "illegally invaded" but who, evidently, made the trains run on time, demands that we take down the House of Saud because it's a "repressive" regime and doesn't give a single thought to who will walk into that power vacuum, which is a group of Islamic fundamentalists far worse than the Sauds and probably on a par with the Taliban and the mullahs of Iran. Better the devil we know.

Some people are too bone stupid to be allowed to opine on international geopolitics.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60777
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by pErvinalia » Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:09 am

Forty Two wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:About that lie you made earlier? :ask:
Again... soooo Ratskep. Joke. :hilarious:
:think:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60777
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by pErvinalia » Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:10 am

Seth wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:
Forty Two wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:The US should have invaded Saudi Arabia
On what basis?

Saudi Arabia never attacked the US.
There was no UN resolution or permission to attack Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia has no WMD.
Iraq never attacked the US.
Iraq invaded Kuwait, an ally of ours with whom we had a defense treaty.
There was no UN resolution or permission to attack Iraq.
A UN resolution is not required for the US to come to the defense of its allies. Never has been. Never will be.
Iraq had no WMD.
Iraq most certainly DID have WMDs, thousands upon thousands of artillery shells and bombs loaded with Sarin, among other things (which are now, or were until recently in Syria, transported there just prior to the 2nd Gulf War. Just ask the Kurds who were gassed using those WMDS in the 1980s, or the Iranians.

And, Saddam went to great pains to convince the rest of the world that he DID have both nuke and biological WMD programs in operation. It turned out to be a bluff, but it was a good one and got his neck stretched eventually. You don't go to war with perfect intelligence, you go to war with the intelligence you have, which all of the Coalition leaders agreed was compelling enough to restart hostilities because Saddam was refusing to honor the conditions of the cease-fire agreement he signed after we kicked his ass out of Kuwait.
We were talking about 2003, genius.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60777
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by pErvinalia » Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:12 am

Seth wrote:
piscator wrote:
Brian Peacock wrote:
Seth wrote:The US does not have a mandate to take down "repressive theocracies" sua sponte. However "repressive" SA may be, it's not our business to go nation-building over there. If the people of SA want to rise up against the repressive regime and ask for our assistance, we may be persuaded to assist them if doing so is in our national interests. Or not.
But in the meantime the US, along with the UK and other 'Western Powers' are quite happy sell the Saudi's the means to suppress popular uprisings. If it comes to choosing between arms deals and supporting an oppressed population which side do you think the US is going to come down on?

U.S. approves $1.29 billion sale of smart bombs to Saudi Arabia (Reuturs, 15 Nov 2015).


Who do you have in mind to morally run SA after your boycotts and shaming letters force the House of Saud to remorsefully abdicate and turn themselves over to the World Court?
The Whabbi fundamentalists like the ones in Iran of course. rEv bitches about our taking down Saddam, who he says was "illegally invaded" but who, evidently, made the trains run on time, demands that we take down the House of Saud because it's a "repressive" regime and doesn't give a single thought to who will walk into that power vacuum, which is a group of Islamic fundamentalists far worse than the Sauds and probably on a par with the Taliban and the mullahs of Iran. Better the devil we know.

Some people are too bone stupid to be allowed to opine on international geopolitics.
Some people are too bone stupid to understand what Iraq invasion we were talking about and that the "invasion of SA" was a rhetorical device to make a point. :fp:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
piscator
Posts: 4725
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:11 am
Location: The Big BSOD
Contact:

Re: Science Undecided on Room Temperature Superconductors

Post by piscator » Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:58 am

Seth wrote:
piscator wrote:


[To Peacock] Who do you have in mind to morally run SA after your boycotts and shaming letters force the House of Saud to remorsefully abdicate and turn themselves over to the World Court?
The Whabbi fundamentalists like the ones in Iran of course.

Tough sell there.
Not very many Salafis in Shiite Iran in the first place. A Persian would have a job conquering Arabia in the second. (Would probably have to lead his army from a winged horse.)

Regardless of how we feel about either, we need to keep things in balance in the Gulf of Oman, lest either Shia or Sunni feel strong enough to kick things off with the world's Superhighway of Oil right in the middle.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests