Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Hermit » Sat Oct 17, 2015 3:02 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
surreptitious57 wrote:Jerome has been banned from Rat Skep and before that he was banned from International Skeptics that used to
be the old JREF forum. I am not aware of any where else that he has been banned from but there may be others
He might have been a troll but if so he was a benign rather than a malicious one. I did complain about it but that
did not go down well and I have decided to stay quite about such things from now on as that is not why I am there
Thanks.
Like me, Surreptitious57 is confusing "Jerome Da Gnome" with "Jerome". The former has been banned at the Rational Skepticism forum a couple of months ago, and a multitude of others before that. The latter is the mild mannered one, and although he has not posted at Ratskep since early May this year, he is neither banned nor suspended there or, as far as I know, at any other forum.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74158
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by JimC » Sat Oct 17, 2015 5:50 am

Whenever I hear the term "mild mannered", I cannot help but think of Clark Kent...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat Oct 17, 2015 7:32 pm

JimC wrote:Whenever I hear the term "mild mannered", I cannot help but think of Clark Kent...
So this then.

We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat Oct 17, 2015 8:02 pm

Hermit wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
surreptitious57 wrote:Jerome has been banned from Rat Skep and before that he was banned from International Skeptics that used to
be the old JREF forum. I am not aware of any where else that he has been banned from but there may be others
He might have been a troll but if so he was a benign rather than a malicious one. I did complain about it but that
did not go down well and I have decided to stay quite about such things from now on as that is not why I am there
Thanks.
Like me, Surreptitious57 is confusing "Jerome Da Gnome" with "Jerome". The former has been banned at the Rational Skepticism forum a couple of months ago, and a multitude of others before that. The latter is the mild mannered one, and although he has not posted at Ratskep since early May this year, he is neither banned nor suspended there or, as far as I know, at any other forum.
By the description it sounds little surr57 is right on the money as the religious jerome hasn't been banned yet. Though he will have to continue to bend his knee and suck left wing cock if he doesn't want to be banned. Jerome Da Gnome had the audacity to have different opinions than the general groupthink that is ratskep. First they claim you are a troll without evidence and then they ban you for being a troll as you can't have wrongthink at ratskep. Yes he was a climate change denier and was wrong on that. Though if you are going to ban people for being delusional then how is anybody left at ratskep. Seriously how do you think you have all the right answers on everything without being mentally ill? To believe you are so right that you can ban anyone who has a different opinion than you. That is some fucked up shit which leads to education camps, death camps and a mountain of dead bodies. Still that is the raison d'être of the left and always has been.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
NineBerry
Tame Wolf
Posts: 9101
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:35 pm
Location: nSk
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by NineBerry » Sun Oct 18, 2015 11:19 am

Drama Queen. I am sorry. Drama King.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39950
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Brian Peacock » Sun Oct 18, 2015 6:11 pm

No, I think you were right first time.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Strontium Dog
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:28 am
About me: Navy Seals are not seals
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Strontium Dog » Sun Oct 18, 2015 7:31 pm

JimC wrote:Whenever I hear the term "mild mannered", I cannot help but think of Clark Kent...
Whenever I hear the term "RatSkep" I cannot help but think of Kents.
100% verifiable facts or your money back. Anti-fascist. Enemy of woo - theistic or otherwise. Cloth is not an antiviral. Imagination and fantasy is no substitute for tangible reality. Wishing doesn't make it real.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater

User avatar
Scot Dutchy
Posts: 19000
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
About me: Dijkbeschermer
Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Scot Dutchy » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:58 pm

Light up.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:09 am

NineBerry wrote:Drama Queen. I am sorry. Drama King.
Lol, what would you lefties do without insults and shaming tactics. If you want to refute anything I posted then feel free to do so as your paucity of anything substantial is becoming bleeding obvious by now. :lol:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:12 am

Strontium Dog wrote:
JimC wrote:Whenever I hear the term "mild mannered", I cannot help but think of Clark Kent...
Whenever I hear the term "RatSkep" I cannot help but think of Kents.
You are a kinder soul than me. :smoke:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Fri Oct 30, 2015 4:59 am

Is anyone up for making odds on when 'forty two' is considered a 'troll' for wrongthink at ratskep and is banned. It can't be long now. I have noticed the apologized for ratskep hardly post here anymore because they know ratskep is nothing more but an echo chamber. Not that this place is any better as it is full of delusional fuckwits but the whole free speech thing stops it becoming some ideological shitfest.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13761
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by rainbow » Fri Oct 30, 2015 6:22 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
NineBerry wrote:Drama Queen. I am sorry. Drama King.
Lol, what would you lefties do without insults and shaming tactics. If you want to refute anything I posted then feel free to do so as your paucity of anything substantial is becoming bleeding obvious by now. :lol:
...exactly what we would expect from a Neo-Nazi Fascist Reactionary.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

User avatar
Scot Dutchy
Posts: 19000
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
About me: Dijkbeschermer
Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Scot Dutchy » Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:43 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:Is anyone up for making odds on when 'forty two' is considered a 'troll' for wrongthink at ratskep and is banned. It can't be long now. I have noticed the apologized for ratskep hardly post here anymore because they know ratskep is nothing more but an echo chamber. Not that this place is any better as it is full of delusional fuckwits but the whole free speech thing stops it becoming some ideological shitfest.
The brownarm gang is making a take over of the forum. Unless you support Corbyn unflinchingly you are now classed as second class and open to personal insults.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by Scott1328 » Fri Oct 30, 2015 10:25 pm

Scot Dutchy wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:Is anyone up for making odds on when 'forty two' is considered a 'troll' for wrongthink at ratskep and is banned. It can't be long now. I have noticed the apologized for ratskep hardly post here anymore because they know ratskep is nothing more but an echo chamber. Not that this place is any better as it is full of delusional fuckwits but the whole free speech thing stops it becoming some ideological shitfest.
The brownarm gang is making a take over of the forum. Unless you support Corbyn unflinchingly you are now classed as second class and open to personal insults.
You were suspended for quote mining.

You never had any class

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat Oct 31, 2015 12:20 am

rainbow wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
NineBerry wrote:Drama Queen. I am sorry. Drama King.
Lol, what would you lefties do without insults and shaming tactics. If you want to refute anything I posted then feel free to do so as your paucity of anything substantial is becoming bleeding obvious by now. :lol:
...exactly what we would expect from a Neo-Nazi Fascist Reactionary.
:shifty:

We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests