Why creationists can laugh at atheist feminists?

[DaveDodo007]

What if you just don't give a fuck about their 'man hate' or their 'patriarchy' or anything else they have to say? Are you still an 'enabler'? My default answer to any ranting lunatic, be they feminist man haters or chin bearded women haters or fanatic socialists or libertarian laizze whatevers is 'go fuck yourself, I don't give a rat's supporting rectum what you think'. I don't give a shit about patriarchy, or social injustice, or gender discrimination, or racism, or salary differentials, or rape enablers, or starving Ebola ridden child soldiers in central Africa, I don't lose a second of sleep over any of it. Now, try to take MY shit or restrict ME in the name of whatever overridingly important Facebook cause you can't seem to ignore and I'll put a bullet in your head, but otherwise it is of less concern to me than what color underwear PZ Meyers is wanking into today. I've been accused of being a selfish, 'I got mine so fuck you' asshole, and that's actually pretty accurate as far as it goes. Get a fucking life, you might actually enjoy a bit of it. You gonna be dead a LONG damn time, mate, so best enjoy it while you can.

I'm coming around to your way of thinking at a rate of knots that I don't feel comfortable with. Though how do you turn your empathy on and off like a tap/faucet (lol, I lived in yankeeland for a short time.) Pensioners built the world that I used to like living in so why not give them a pension. The physically and mentally disabled still struggle just to live by a day to day basis. The sick should be cured or at least comforted If you lose your job you and/or your dependents shouldn't have to stave to death. Free education makes for a better nation.
If I'm honest I still feel wounded by the lies of the left, if you want a fair society then vote for us. It wasn't too bad at first as they had the ghost of George Orwell watching them. Though now their true colours are coming out, they weaponised my empathy to just gain control of the current narrative. They use compassion (and still do) to control the common people. If you don't support this or that you are a bad person. They don't even pretend to care about free speech, free expression and freedom of conscience anymore. It was all just a shell game. I don't mind the journey though I will probably hate the conclusion.

[pErvinalia]

Here we go again, logic for feminists (I know that that is a swear word so please feel free to run to your 'safe places'.)

http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/20 ... doctrines/

"Motte and Bailey Doctrine".
This practise of argument supposes a hypothetical medieval settlement containing an open, resource-rich field - the "Motte" - which is practically indefensible, and the fortified "Bailey", which is extremely defensible but ultimately resource poor. In applying this argument, its user will alternate between attacking using incendiary statements that are guaranteed to generate interest and publicity, and will then fall back on highly defensible but ultimately useless statements when refuted.


Example:

(Motte) "All men are rapists! Feminism is the practise of dismantling the patriarchy and taking down the evil men that oppress women!"

(A rebuttal is offered, contradicting their vitriol)

(Bailey) "Feminism is just the humble request that women be treated equally to men. Surely you don't disagree with that, right?"

This process then goes back and forth with the arguer "working the Motte" with gross attack statements that garner followers and make their position strong (or at least visible) and then fall back on neutral or even contradictory statements that their opponent cannot reasonably refute without appearing to be the aggressor; "Why would you say you're against feminism when it's good for everyone???"

Rinse And Repeat.

Anyone would think that being on a forum with the word rational in the name would mean the many of their members would be rational, though those people would be wrong. Look how many conspiracy theorist call themselves truthers. That is why we get so many atheists creationist (or if you want to be pedantic then ideologues) calling themselves feminists.

What is irrational is lumping all feminists together. Can you really not see you are the mirror image of an irrational A+'er?? Just review your vitriolic rants here, Dave. You're not here to argue some finer points of a debate.

Not really, I'm providing evidence of their man hate and anyone who doesn't have a problem with their man hate is an enabler. If I was an A+ er I would run off to a 'safe place' and block anybody who disagrees with me whilst calling then name and trying to shame them. Funny how that is more your method than mine.

You are here to vent your spleen about how fucked your life allegedly is because of teh womenz. Go and rant on your women-hating websites. We aren't interested in your irrationality here.

I'm making plenty of points and you just run to the creationist book of arguing to deny them and here we go. I am a women hater because I'm a anti-feminist, nice equivocation you have there. You don't seem to need any more evidence to come to that conclusion even the fact that I'm here debating men should at least tell you how stupid that claim is. Yet I provide loads of evidence that feminists hate men and you claim they don't. That's some fancy cognitive dissonance you have there. No wonder you want a 'rationalist' forum where only people who agree with you can come to as you are just rubbish at debating. I'm still waiting for evidence of that patriarchy you claim exists or do I after prove it doesn't exist as I'm still trying to prove that god doesn't exist and it might take some time.

You might have to go on ignore to save myself from getting suspended again. Your stupidity pisses me right off. You are the mirror image of an A+er. It doesn't matter what we say you just rant and rave and then disappear for a while before coming back and just repeating the same tired old rants. And this patriarchy thing. Fuck, it's like you just totally ignored my last post. YOU fucking just gave us proof of the patriarchy you $###^#$$#&! You don't even fucking know what the term is. FFS, get a fucking education.

[laklak]

Here's the thing Dave - some shit you can change and some shit you can't. Hairy legged feminists, gangbanging Bloods-N-Cripps, social justice warrior numpties on A+, fundy Christian assholes - ain't fuck all you can do about them. All you can change is your reaction to their bullshit. The very best revenge is living well. When I'm finally anchored out off the Keys, Jimmy Buffet playing, spiff in hand, fat grouper on the grill, I'll raise my margarita glass to all those angry, pompous, self-absorbed fuckwits and thank fucking Dog I ain't them. Let them get all froth mouthed over what some inbred numbnuts Republican state senator from Bumfuck, Idaho said on twitter or how many ghetto kids got shot in some shithole city they don't live in and won't ever visit. They can get as red faced and furious as they want over whatever imagined slight they found on Facebook this morning, I won't give a flying rat fuck, because I checked out of Hotel GiveAShit a long time ago. Been working on this escape plan for two goddamn decades now and it's finally all coming together. In a few months I'll wake to sunrise over the Gulf, gulls wheeling overhead, full fuel tanks, nowhere I have to be and no one telling me what I have to do. I'll never have to answer to a single, solitary dumbfuck ground ape ever, ever again.

So who wins, them or me?

[pErvinalia]

THE MANGINAS WIN, LAKELAKE!!11

[laklak]

I would LOVE to have a mangina. And a dick, of course. It would be one-stop shopping.

[piscator]

"Come Mista TallyMan
Tally up de fuel tax,
Drawbridge fees,
An de WestMarine"

[laklak]

Fucking West Marine. Pack of 8 316 stainless 1 1/2 inch screws for 6 bucks. I asked 'what are these, gold?' and the moron said 'no, they're steel'.

Jesus.

[Scott1328]

I would LOVE to have a mangina. And a dick, of course. It would be one-stop shopping.

Dear Laklak,

Before mangina was appropriated by the MRA's and MGTOW's it had another meaning in gay circles. Rest assured, every man has one, and if you can make use of your mangina as you imply above, I wanna meet you.

[laklak]

Sweet talker. Bring wine.

[pErvinalia]

I'm hyperventilating my mangina this very minute...

[DaveDodo007]

Here we go again, logic for feminists (I know that that is a swear word so please feel free to run to your 'safe places'.)

http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/20 ... doctrines/

"Motte and Bailey Doctrine".
This practise of argument supposes a hypothetical medieval settlement containing an open, resource-rich field - the "Motte" - which is practically indefensible, and the fortified "Bailey", which is extremely defensible but ultimately resource poor. In applying this argument, its user will alternate between attacking using incendiary statements that are guaranteed to generate interest and publicity, and will then fall back on highly defensible but ultimately useless statements when refuted.


Example:

(Motte) "All men are rapists! Feminism is the practise of dismantling the patriarchy and taking down the evil men that oppress women!"

(A rebuttal is offered, contradicting their vitriol)

(Bailey) "Feminism is just the humble request that women be treated equally to men. Surely you don't disagree with that, right?"

This process then goes back and forth with the arguer "working the Motte" with gross attack statements that garner followers and make their position strong (or at least visible) and then fall back on neutral or even contradictory statements that their opponent cannot reasonably refute without appearing to be the aggressor; "Why would you say you're against feminism when it's good for everyone???"

Rinse And Repeat.

Anyone would think that being on a forum with the word rational in the name would mean the many of their members would be rational, though those people would be wrong. Look how many conspiracy theorist call themselves truthers. That is why we get so many atheists creationist (or if you want to be pedantic then ideologues) calling themselves feminists.

What is irrational is lumping all feminists together. Can you really not see you are the mirror image of an irrational A+'er?? Just review your vitriolic rants here, Dave. You're not here to argue some finer points of a debate.

Not really, I'm providing evidence of their man hate and anyone who doesn't have a problem with their man hate is an enabler. If I was an A+ er I would run off to a 'safe place' and block anybody who disagrees with me whilst calling then name and trying to shame them. Funny how that is more your method than mine.

You are here to vent your spleen about how fucked your life allegedly is because of teh womenz. Go and rant on your women-hating websites. We aren't interested in your irrationality here.

I'm making plenty of points and you just run to the creationist book of arguing to deny them and here we go. I am a women hater because I'm a anti-feminist, nice equivocation you have there. You don't seem to need any more evidence to come to that conclusion even the fact that I'm here debating men should at least tell you how stupid that claim is. Yet I provide loads of evidence that feminists hate men and you claim they don't. That's some fancy cognitive dissonance you have there. No wonder you want a 'rationalist' forum where only people who agree with you can come to as you are just rubbish at debating. I'm still waiting for evidence of that patriarchy you claim exists or do I after prove it doesn't exist as I'm still trying to prove that god doesn't exist and it might take some time.

You might have to go on ignore to save myself from getting suspended again. Your stupidity pisses me right off. You are the mirror image of an A+er.

Fucking lol, I have already explained the difference and you like the creationist you are choose to ignore it. You can't escape reality by putting your fingers in your ears and saying "la la la la la". I'm pro free speech and hearing other peoples opinions and A+ and you are not, You are simply projecting now. Please, please put me on ignore and expose yourself as a pathetic creationist.

It doesn't matter what we say you just rant and rave and then disappear for a while before coming back and just repeating the same tired old rants.

Trust me I wish I had more free time to expose your delusional position but sadly I don't.

And this patriarchy thing. Fuck, it's like you just totally ignored my last post. YOU fucking just gave us proof of the patriarchy you $###^#$$#&! You don't even fucking know what the term is. FFS, get a fucking education.

Hmmm a couple of posts on rationalia are proof that all men oppress all women all the time. Somebody better let Pappa know. How about it is an unevidenced social construct which has no basis in reality. Though feel free to show me the peer reviewed papers on the Patriarchy and where a global consensus was reached by the majority of scientists. Oh I'm sorry I forgot that now: feelz ur realz.


Get an education lol, maybe I should read some sophisimacal theology before I reject the god hypothesis.

[DaveDodo007]

Here's the thing Dave - some shit you can change and some shit you can't. Hairy legged feminists, gangbanging Bloods-N-Cripps, social justice warrior numpties on A+, fundy Christian assholes - ain't fuck all you can do about them. All you can change is your reaction to their bullshit. The very best revenge is living well. When I'm finally anchored out off the Keys, Jimmy Buffet playing, spiff in hand, fat grouper on the grill, I'll raise my margarita glass to all those angry, pompous, self-absorbed fuckwits and thank fucking Dog I ain't them. Let them get all froth mouthed over what some inbred numbnuts Republican state senator from Bumfuck, Idaho said on twitter or how many ghetto kids got shot in some shithole city they don't live in and won't ever visit. They can get as red faced and furious as they want over whatever imagined slight they found on Facebook this morning, I won't give a flying rat fuck, because I checked out of Hotel GiveAShit a long time ago. Been working on this escape plan for two goddamn decades now and it's finally all coming together. In a few months I'll wake to sunrise over the Gulf, gulls wheeling overhead, full fuel tanks, nowhere I have to be and no one telling me what I have to do. I'll never have to answer to a single, solitary dumbfuck ground ape ever, ever again.

So who wins, them or me?

I'm mostly there already though you are missing out on the lulz when you expose the left for being lying anti-science and pro censorship maggotty scum.

[laklak]

Ah, but that could be construed as giving a fuck.

[pErvinalia]

Here we go again, logic for feminists (I know that that is a swear word so please feel free to run to your 'safe places'.)

http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/20 ... doctrines/

"Motte and Bailey Doctrine".
This practise of argument supposes a hypothetical medieval settlement containing an open, resource-rich field - the "Motte" - which is practically indefensible, and the fortified "Bailey", which is extremely defensible but ultimately resource poor. In applying this argument, its user will alternate between attacking using incendiary statements that are guaranteed to generate interest and publicity, and will then fall back on highly defensible but ultimately useless statements when refuted.


Example:

(Motte) "All men are rapists! Feminism is the practise of dismantling the patriarchy and taking down the evil men that oppress women!"

(A rebuttal is offered, contradicting their vitriol)

(Bailey) "Feminism is just the humble request that women be treated equally to men. Surely you don't disagree with that, right?"

This process then goes back and forth with the arguer "working the Motte" with gross attack statements that garner followers and make their position strong (or at least visible) and then fall back on neutral or even contradictory statements that their opponent cannot reasonably refute without appearing to be the aggressor; "Why would you say you're against feminism when it's good for everyone???"

Rinse And Repeat.

Anyone would think that being on a forum with the word rational in the name would mean the many of their members would be rational, though those people would be wrong. Look how many conspiracy theorist call themselves truthers. That is why we get so many atheists creationist (or if you want to be pedantic then ideologues) calling themselves feminists.

What is irrational is lumping all feminists together. Can you really not see you are the mirror image of an irrational A+'er?? Just review your vitriolic rants here, Dave. You're not here to argue some finer points of a debate.

Not really, I'm providing evidence of their man hate and anyone who doesn't have a problem with their man hate is an enabler. If I was an A+ er I would run off to a 'safe place' and block anybody who disagrees with me whilst calling then name and trying to shame them. Funny how that is more your method than mine.

You are here to vent your spleen about how fucked your life allegedly is because of teh womenz. Go and rant on your women-hating websites. We aren't interested in your irrationality here.

I'm making plenty of points and you just run to the creationist book of arguing to deny them and here we go. I am a women hater because I'm a anti-feminist, nice equivocation you have there. You don't seem to need any more evidence to come to that conclusion even the fact that I'm here debating men should at least tell you how stupid that claim is. Yet I provide loads of evidence that feminists hate men and you claim they don't. That's some fancy cognitive dissonance you have there. No wonder you want a 'rationalist' forum where only people who agree with you can come to as you are just rubbish at debating. I'm still waiting for evidence of that patriarchy you claim exists or do I after prove it doesn't exist as I'm still trying to prove that god doesn't exist and it might take some time.

You might have to go on ignore to save myself from getting suspended again. Your stupidity pisses me right off. You are the mirror image of an A+er.

Fucking lol, I have already explained the difference and you like the creationist you are choose to ignore it. You can't escape reality by putting your fingers in your ears and saying "la la la la la". I'm pro free speech and hearing other peoples opinions and A+ and you are not, You are simply projecting now. Please, please put me on ignore and expose yourself as a pathetic creationist.

It doesn't matter what we say you just rant and rave and then disappear for a while before coming back and just repeating the same tired old rants.

Trust me I wish I had more free time to expose your delusional position but sadly I don't.

And this patriarchy thing. Fuck, it's like you just totally ignored my last post. YOU fucking just gave us proof of the patriarchy you $###^#$$#&! You don't even fucking know what the term is. FFS, get a fucking education.

Hmmm a couple of posts on rationalia are proof that all men oppress all women all the time. Somebody better let Pappa know. How about it is an unevidenced social construct which has no basis in reality. Though feel free to show me the peer reviewed papers on the Patriarchy and where a global consensus was reached by the majority of scientists. Oh I'm sorry I forgot that now: feelz ur realz.

You must be operating under some sort of brain injury. Seriously, how can you be so fucking thick?? YOU, you, DaveDodo, the person sitting in your chair now looking at your computer screen, in the UK, you, DaveDodo, EXPLAINED ONE HALF OF THE FUCKING PATRIARCHY YOURSELF, NOT MORE THAN A HANDFUL OF POSTS AGO. You need to see a doctor, STAT.

[DaveDodo007]

You must be operating under some sort of brain injury. Seriously, how can you be so fucking thick?? YOU, you, DaveDodo, the person sitting in your chair now looking at your computer screen, in the UK, you, DaveDodo, EXPLAINED ONE HALF OF THE FUCKING PATRIARCHY YOURSELF, NOT MORE THAN A HANDFUL OF POSTS AGO. You need to see a doctor, STAT.

Lolwut? I have looked over my posts and I'm not seeing what you are seeing. So indulge me, start a new post and include my posts were I show the patriarchy exists and I will get back to you.