Rationalskepiticism,lol.

[Strontium Dog]

I thought you might give a figurative shit. You're basically known as, for lack of a better word, a liar. I thought you might like the opportunity to prove that you weren't.

You cheeky little fucker. I am honest to a fault. Just because the likes of you and 914, and latterly others, thought that twisting my words was a wizard wheeze does not make me a liar. What I do have is several examples of you telling outright untruths about me. Claiming that I made disgusting comments about gays and disabled people. The "disgusting comment about gays" amounted to a joke about quotemining which went "let me... mine your ass"; rEvolutionist's initial response was a laughing smiley. The "disgusting comment about disabled people" was a reference I made to "nutters", a word that rEvolutionist himself had used on numerous previous occasions. This was the sort of thoroughly dishonest provocation I endured from you every day for years. Needless to say, I don't miss those days at all. The glass in your glass house is so thick the bricks would bounce back at you.

[pErvinalia]

Ok. So link to the modnote about aspire's sock.

[Strontium Dog]

What did your last slave die of?

For someone who has fuck all to do, you are remarkably lazy.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F% ... aspire1670

[pErvinalia]

I resemble that remark!

[pErvinalia]

Well something strange is going on, as aspire1670 isn't even a member there any more. Looks like he was disappeared.

edit: unless he requested to be removed from the site.

edit+: no, he still has a member profile there. But he's not in the members list.

[Mr.Samsa]

Incidentally Mr Samsa - I was going to let this go once, twice, three times or however many it was. But since your butthurt is clearly so strong that you're not going to let go of the whole thing until it's forcibly extracted from your sphincter:

Can you provide an example of me jerking someone off please? I'd like to see what that looks like.

The thread mentioned above is a good example of it! You popped into the thread to defend Beatsong's assertion that The Guardian is a feminist publication

I never made that assertion.

and that I was being dishonest by not accepting that all journalists who write for it are feminists.

Nor that one.

You're lying.

Oh don't try to back down now, Beatsong! I gave you every opportunity to back out of that ridiculous claim and you kept hammering it home, over and over and over again.

I'm glad that you now seem to accept that your original sources weren't evidence of feminist opinion but it's a little late now.

How am I being a tit? I respond respectfully to other people on the forum and I put time into making substantive posts - in response I get more personal attacks and off-topic inflammatory marks from shitheads like you who have no interest in discussing the topic but instead just want to attack me.

Attack you?

Perspective Samsa, really

Are you serious here, Paula? You're going to pretend that you were nice to me and I just suddenly started disliking you? Fucking hell.

I'm being an arse? Take a look in the mirror. Do you remember when you joined in with the others to argue that I was being "difficult" because I wouldn't accept that every journalist who writes for The Guardian was a feminist? That's what an arse looks like.

Do you want to add a 'Nanananana ' to that or are you happy with how it is?

No, I'm quite happy pointing out that you're being a hypocrite trying to calling other people tits and arses.

Have a look at that feminism/evo psych thread where you dropped in to make off-topic inflammatory remarks about me. What points did you make at all on the topic of feminism, evo psych, or the interaction of the two? Precisely zero.

You mean the same thread you're talking about above? Just in case anyone thinks I'm stalking you over the forum to "attack" you. I'm sure you wouldn't want anyone getting that impression would you?

Getting the correct impression that you stalk and attack me?

Ah yes, the problem clearly was that I was trying to speak for all women and ignoring your view. Not that that ever happened, and the closest thing would have been where I pointed out that just because you don't find something personally problematic to you it doesn't mean that other women don't like it.

I'm pretty sure that's exactly how you see it, other opinions may vary. That's your main problem, other opinions, so it's kind of pointless arguing the point with you.

The problem you're missing is that you're opinion is irrelevant to the question of whether some women find something problematic. If you don't find it problematic, super, but don't try to dismiss them because you're happy with your life. It's that kind of reasoning that leads everyone on the forum to think you're a bit of a brainless twit and why you really should stick to the social and fun sections.

What about when you and some of the other mods harassed me for months on the thread and in PMs by accusing me of being mentally ill? That was pretty shit, I thought.

That is an utter lie. I'm not a mod, never have been so 'other' seems a bit misleading. I have never PM'ed you. I have never commented on your mental state, nor would I. Why are you lying? I can see how making me look like a cunt is beneficial to you but that's low.

I've never claimed you were a mod, nor that you PM'd me, but you did join in on the harassment involving an attack on my supposed mental state.

I don't need to try to make you look like a cunt, you do it all by yourself, you bitter woman.

Not quite, Paula, it's more because you and others were engaging in quite abusive behavior towards me and then when I made the mildest of possible comments towards you (that you were "intentionally being ignorant" of a particular topic, where you were claiming a woman shouldn't have felt intimidated by a guy following her because you wouldn't have) you flew off the handle at me, despite there being no personal attack or breaking of the rules with that comment.

What form did this "flying off the handle" take?

Perspective again Samsa, such a delicate flower should be more aware of his own actions.

Do you not remember your response in that thread? You threw a hissy fit and demanded that the mods sanction me for my egregious comment.

It was funny to see Paula try to accuse me of reporting her posts in that thread as every time she did, I'd check my inbox and I'd have another comment saying: "What the fuck is wrong with Paula in that thread?!".

Really, that quite innocuous couple of posts really made lots of people PM you? How many?

"Innocuous"? You really have no clue how horrible you are, do you? Four people PM'd me and all claimed to be your friend or at least viewed you on friendly terms by expressing regret having to report you, and I'm sure others reported it as well.

I tended to like Samsa [still do], and as a mod he was respected. So what changed? Not Samsa.

Thanks Gallstones, I've always respected and liked you too. You make a good point though - my posting style hasn't changed, my positions haven't changed, and my comments are just as within the rules as they have always been. Yet now it seems like it's open season.

How am I being a tit? I respond respectfully to other people on the forum and I put time into making substantive posts...

Yeah, your animated gifs render you a model of decorum.

Uhm Skinny Puppy and Witticism cough.

Exactly - I modelled my responses on their comments, and even stole a few of their gifs, and I was waiting to see how long it'd take for people to get pissed off at me whilst similarly designed comments from them getting thumbs ups.

It was funny to see Paula try to accuse me of reporting her posts in that thread as every time she did, I'd check my inbox and I'd have another comment saying: "What the fuck is wrong with Paula in that thread?!".

How would Paula/Scarlet the not at all exotic know that her posts were reported?

It is possible to check by trying to report it yourself and getting the error message that it's already been reported.

This thread looks like loads of fun. So much butthurt in such a small space. But I guess that's in the very fundamental nature of butthurt.

Hi Surendra, nice to meet you

I'm Paula the pond-life moderately intelligent attention whore

"Moderately intelligent"? Why so generous?

How am I being a tit? I respond respectfully to other people on the forum and I put time into making substantive posts...

Yeah, your animated gifs render you a model of decorum.

Cool, another lurker! Who are you over there? I've seen that avatar before, but I can't quite place it.

He's your favourite postmodernist essay generator - Cito.

[pErvinalia]

Is he really? I had a feeling non-ergodic was him, but his comments here seemed to be in English. Cito normally doesn't write comments structured in English grammar. Sure, they are English words, but they usually make no sense when they are strung together.

I hope he hangs around. I'd like to troll the fuck out of him with the slightly looser mod standards here...

[JimC]

Is he really? I had a feeling non-ergodic was him, but his comments here seemed to be in English. Cito normally doesn't write comments structured in English grammar. Sure, they are English words, but they usually make no sense when they are strung together.

I hope he hangs around. I'd like to troll the fuck out of him with the slightly looser mod standards here...

Loose?

I'll have you know I'm feeling tighter than a virgin's snatch at the moment!

[pErvinalia]

[Mr.Samsa]

Is he really? I had a feeling non-ergodic was him, but his comments here seemed to be in English. Cito normally doesn't write comments structured in English grammar. Sure, they are English words, but they usually make no sense when they are strung together.

I hope he hangs around. I'd like to troll the fuck out of him with the slightly looser mod standards here...

Like I said earlier, I'm pretty sure he is capable of writing coherent sentences but he is just an epic troll over there. I actually think that he enjoys watching everyone agree with his randomly generated comments because at the end he's gonna reveal that it was a big experiment to show how much of a circlejerk RatSkep can be, where people will agree with a incoherent claim just because it appears to support their beliefs.

[pErvinalia]

I must admit, I've had that thought before too. It's either that, or he's rollicking drunk when he posts.

[Mr.Samsa]

I must admit, I've had that thought before too. It's either that, or he's rollicking drunk when he posts.

To be completely serious for a moment (and absolutely not using this as an insult), I think he does have some issues which causes his nonsensical utterances. I don't know if it's a psychological issue, or just drinking as you say, but multiple of times I've considered going easier because I don't know what's going on with him. But then I remember that he's an asshole and I stop caring.

[pErvinalia]

If he does have problems, drinking or otherwise... a lot of us do (myself included). I more or less just respond to the words that present themselves on the screen in front of me. It's all a big game. If there weren't any rules, I'd be a total cunt probably...

[Paula1]

Oh my, new low reached.

Do ya feel the love? Do ya? Do ya?

[pErvinalia]

This is only a 'new middle', here on ratz. "Lows" usually involve heinous rape jokes...