We are in for some very interesting debates about what consciousness really is when we start making robots that behave like they had it

rEvolutionist wrote:I mean the phenomenology. The feeling of self.
What does that mean? Do you not know what subjective phenomenology means?Hermit wrote:rEvolutionist wrote:I mean the phenomenology. The feeling of self.
I read some Husserl in the past. This lead me to add phenomenology to metaphysics, positivism, psychoanalysis, libertarianism, the dictatorship of the proletariat et al in the metaphorical landfill site. It would be nice if you expanded on what you are driving at, but suspect this won't happen.rEvolutionist wrote:What does that mean? Do you not know what subjective phenomenology means?Hermit wrote:rEvolutionist wrote:I mean the phenomenology. The feeling of self.
Just thinking about this, I'm not sure that being drunk is a good analogy. We are most certainly still conscious when we are drinking, it's just that we forget it afterwards. Essentially we are physiologically impaired. And I'd imagine the point of going unconscious after having a huge amount of grog probably isn't all that different from going unconscious when we fall asleep.MiM wrote:BTW, I don't necessarily think consciousness is a on/off thing. I think there are many levels at which something can be self-conscious. Actually you only have to get thoroughly drunk to experience a lesser degree of consciousness. Thought this way, there is no well defined point at which consciousness emerges, it's a sliding scale.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests