mistermack wrote:Many people say they've been raped, when they haven't. People don't always tell the truth.Warren Dew wrote:Many rape victims say yes.Collector1337 wrote:So, rape is worse than death now?

mistermack wrote:Many people say they've been raped, when they haven't. People don't always tell the truth.Warren Dew wrote:Many rape victims say yes.Collector1337 wrote:So, rape is worse than death now?
Was that meant to be supermassive dark humour?Warren Dew wrote:Many rape victims say yes.Collector1337 wrote:So, rape is worse than death now?
I thought it might be a bleak joke about consent. My apologies.Warren Dew wrote:No. Why would you think so?
Yeah. And they're wrong.Warren Dew wrote:Many rape victims say yes.Collector1337 wrote:So, rape is worse than death now?
I disagree.Collector1337 wrote:Yeah. And they're wrong.Warren Dew wrote:Many rape victims say yes.Collector1337 wrote:So, rape is worse than death now?
As a therapist I've had many clients who have been raped, get depressed and want to commit suicide.
What do you think I tell them?
"Oh yeah, rape is totally worse than death. Might as well just commit suicide then."
That would make me a pretty shitty therapist wouldn't it?
Being raped is not worse than being dead, ever. Period.
In a purely academic sense, yes.Collector1337 wrote:Rape is clearly not as bad as death/murder since you'd still be living after the rape. Just saying.
Yes, obviously such a small child has no means of defending themselves. So, yeah it is horrid.Coito ergo sum wrote:That doesn't mean that a person who would rape a one year old infant doesn't merit a special sort of disgust.... there is something about a person who would do things to a one year old child. Something that triggers my gag reflex. Perhaps it's the ability to "understand" straight out killing in some sense -- there can be rationales for it -- money, power, politics, etc. The rape of an infant, though, seems so downright horrid. So reprehensible. So devoid of any sense or purpose. So contrary to human nature -- I mean, most folks when they see an infant see something to protect, something cute, something without any sort of sexual component, and something that one would not wish to harm in any way. So, when a person not only harms an infant, but also so callously and disgustingly uses the infant for sick sexual gratification... well, in my view, they deserve a special circle of hell, metaphorically speaking.
Audley Strange wrote:I disagree.Collector1337 wrote:Yeah. And they're wrong.Warren Dew wrote:Many rape victims say yes.Collector1337 wrote:So, rape is worse than death now?
As a therapist I've had many clients who have been raped, get depressed and want to commit suicide.
What do you think I tell them?
"Oh yeah, rape is totally worse than death. Might as well just commit suicide then."
That would make me a pretty shitty therapist wouldn't it?
Being raped is not worse than being dead, ever. Period.
Nor was my OP a claim to virtue or superiority. The OP was an opening of a discussion about a particular news story. It is no more a claim to virtue or superiority than any other report of an outrageous occurrence. You may wish to ask yourself why you don't make this sort of comment about other threads, such as where people post news stories of gun crimes and pontificate on the immorality of lax gun laws or allegedly lax gun laws. Are those folks merely attempting to claim a superior virtue?mistermack wrote:I'm always a bit skeptical about the righteous indignation that people come out with about stuff like this.
We all know it's disgusting. It goes without saying.
And going on about it doesn't make you one bit more virtuous. I think people bang on about it because it gives them a warm feeling of superiority, because they are so less depraved than some other people.
Well don't expect a fuckin medal. You're not MEANT to want to rape kiddies. Nobody is. If you don't like kids being raped, that's just being normal, not some sort of saintly superhero.
Obviously psychology and mental health are not your strong suits.Coito ergo sum wrote:In a purely academic sense, yes.Collector1337 wrote:Rape is clearly not as bad as death/murder since you'd still be living after the rape. Just saying.
However, from the perspective of the victim, there are clearly things that happen in life that can effect them in a way that is worse than death. The evidence of that is that sometimes a rape or abuse victim will commit suicide, which means that to them they preferred to die rather than to live with the effects of issue.
And, if a person did that to my daughter, I would certainly kill them if I had the chance, and I would want to do so whether I died or got the death penalty, because some things, to me, are worse than death.
All fair points, but rape also includes using fingers and implements. The article did not specify how it was done. However, I found, as noted above, one incident where it was done by a man in the conventional sense. That guy may well be even worse than my hyperbolically noted worst human ever.Collector1337 wrote:Yes, obviously such a small child has no means of defending themselves. So, yeah it is horrid.Coito ergo sum wrote:That doesn't mean that a person who would rape a one year old infant doesn't merit a special sort of disgust.... there is something about a person who would do things to a one year old child. Something that triggers my gag reflex. Perhaps it's the ability to "understand" straight out killing in some sense -- there can be rationales for it -- money, power, politics, etc. The rape of an infant, though, seems so downright horrid. So reprehensible. So devoid of any sense or purpose. So contrary to human nature -- I mean, most folks when they see an infant see something to protect, something cute, something without any sort of sexual component, and something that one would not wish to harm in any way. So, when a person not only harms an infant, but also so callously and disgustingly uses the infant for sick sexual gratification... well, in my view, they deserve a special circle of hell, metaphorically speaking.
But, how does anyone "rape" an infant?
Especially, how does a woman "rape" an infant?
She has no dick to stick anywhere. Even if she did, it wouldn't fit anywhere. I also doubt an infant gets hard or has any size that she could somehow stick in herself.
So, I think saying "rape" is inaccurate. It's more like groping, or fondling, or whatever, not "rape." But, obviously that shouldn't be happening either.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests